Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
7. No, I'm opposing a narrative that says "2014 isn't important"
Tue May 13, 2014, 07:06 PM
May 2014

If we want to speak of absolutes, I go 1860, then 1932, then 1980 and 1960. Everything else pales in comparison. But the article wants us to believe that this is the "least" important in years, simply because Nate has no real problem with the Repubs taking control of the Senate. He thinks it doesn't matter. How about this- If the Democrats take the House and get a 60 vote majority in the Senate, it becomes the most important election in years. Unlikely? I don't go for self- fulfilling prophecy bullshit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What a load of crap:"...»Reply #7