Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mntleo2

(2,602 posts)
50. Unpaid Work = $450 BILLION a year to replace
Sun May 25, 2014, 06:22 AM
May 2014

We first need to begin to respect and define unpaid work.

According to the AARP it would cost tax payers over $450 BILLION dollars per year if we were to replace the unpaid labor of care giving so women can go out there and make rich men richer saying, "Do you want fries with that?" You can find links and read their wonky report here: http://www.aarp.org/home-family/caregiving/info-10-2012/home-alone-family-caregivers-providing-complex-chronic-care.html

What does this replacement of this unpaid mean, you might ask? Well this is the labor (mostly) women have to do to take care of their children, their elders, and their spouses unpaid and without any consideration for the contributions they make to their communities.

How does this unpaid work contribute to my community or to me, you might ask? Well YOU would be expected to pay that $1/2 Trillion yearly more to build, maintain, and staff facilities in order for someone abandoning their loved ones in order to work for a wage.

(Mostly)women LOSE almost $400,000 over a work lifetime due to this labor according to the AARP and other labor studies.

Social Security calls those years of unpaid care giving "zero years" for the 3 to 5 times in their lifetime (mostly) women make the agonizing decision whether to care for a loved one or work for a wage. This means women who choose to care for this loved one will not be eligible for any pension or Social Security benefits.

If women choose this unpaid labor in order to care for their loved ones, they are most often forced to live off the income of the loved one for the 24/7 unpaid labor that gives them zero benefits such as sick leave, vacation, unemployment benefits, medical benefits or retirement. If they were compensated with a wage according to labor and this AARP study, she would be paid upwards of $137,000 per year for the various tasks she performs such as chauffeuring, cooking, house work, nursing,childcare, elder care, physical therapy, household shopping, and various other tasks that would cost far more of they were sourced out.

Welfare insists that women go back to work when their infant is 3 months old. For a women with a newborn to work for a wage at their McJob, she will make at most $1000 per month while the cost to taxpayers is over $2000 per month for infant daycare alone. Other Over 70% of the McJobs they are forced to work are off hours, evenings, weekends and the like when childcare is nonexistent and if it does exist (my city has ONE off hour daycare at this time) it costs much more. Additional daycare for older potty trained kids can cost from $500-1000 per child per month, also tax paid. For the paid worker, this does not include all the other extra costs they may need such as transportation to work, career clothing, etc. At this time taxpayers subsidize much of this while the McJob yields less than $1000 per month, in essence subsidizing corporations over $4000 more per month so they can pay this McWage.

In contrast if these women were given financial support in order to care for their loved ones, it would cost about $1200 per month, and this includes housing assistance, medical for herself and her kids, and food assistance. If her loved one is an elder or spouse who needs assistance so she can work for a wage, facilities costs could soar to upwards of $8000 per month.

The point is that we seem to "forget" all this unpaid labor that is saving us $Trillions and yet is often not even considered "work". If we were smart, which most of us are not if we do not see this work as worthy, we would realize we would not be burdened with these corporate subsidies, it cost less that 1/5th of what we are paying now to support unpaid labor and give far more stability to families.

My 2 cents (and I have more stats and information)

Cat in Seattle
Board member of P.O.W.E.R http://www.mamapower.org

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And OUR CHILDREN are suffering!!! chervilant May 2014 #1
We haven't seen anything yet yeoman6987 May 2014 #30
No, it's ALWAYS the republican's fault n2doc May 2014 #2
! xchrom May 2014 #3
When I Hear That liberalmike27 May 2014 #19
But it makes me wonder PatrickforO May 2014 #21
I suspect most of them (us) do Armstead May 2014 #35
You clearly haven't met the yahoo who represents my House district... DeadLetterOffice May 2014 #47
i dont have to. i have the greatest rep. mopinko May 2014 #48
Why is that when the GOP is in control they get what they want? And when they're out of power too. Armstead May 2014 #34
Two party system. See Gore Vidal on the topic. McCamy Taylor May 2014 #42
Control is not enough. Until we have 100% of both House and Senate, plus the WH... Demo_Chris May 2014 #4
what we really need... tomp May 2014 #7
That won't work either. If we have 100% we must be magnanimous and form a GoneFishin May 2014 #14
Yep. bvar22 May 2014 #22
And all D appointed SCOTUS judges ctsnowman May 2014 #15
You should study how LBJ got his legislation through Congress. McCamy Taylor May 2014 #43
That little whine and twenty bucks will get you a cup of coffee at the Ritz psiman May 2014 #49
Agree with you 100% ... for years, I've been saying that education and jobs were the key. n/t secondwind May 2014 #5
Cut the Crap™ MannyGoldstein May 2014 #6
If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick or care for our elderly ... Scuba May 2014 #8
The 1% ctsnowman May 2014 #16
... xchrom May 2014 #29
Pretty much the same, apparently. Scuba May 2014 #45
Don't Worry be Happy ... GeorgeGist May 2014 #9
Its been downhill for the Working CLass & Poor... bvar22 May 2014 #23
You are 100% correct. I would MUCH rather have a J-O-B than SNAP benefits! ColesCountyDem May 2014 #10
This happened to a family member - TBF May 2014 #13
But ... Obama went for a walk - TBF May 2014 #11
Who was that guy Thespian2 May 2014 #12
Look South. bvar22 May 2014 #24
To the greedy rich, a third world nation is actually a good thing. You can stretch your ill GoneFishin May 2014 #27
Over on the other board someone posted a graphic that states that O's net worth CrispyQ May 2014 #31
K & R...for exposure... Wounded Bear May 2014 #17
I have been involved with welfare assistance programs since 1966 when I was a divorced single jwirr May 2014 #18
Hear, hear! smallcat88 May 2014 #32
We are never going to get those majorities unless the Democrats truly turn populist and newthinking May 2014 #37
I agree that the Democrats need to stop moving to the center. Back when I was talking about they jwirr May 2014 #40
Excellent post Arthur_Frain May 2014 #39
K & R historylovr May 2014 #20
A few months ago ProSense May 2014 #25
And Clinton signed "welfare reform" as a sop to the right... villager May 2014 #26
6 million seems low. I bet it's a lot higher than that. nt Rhymes With Orange May 2014 #28
Could you tell me which political parties are working to change this? Tikki May 2014 #33
Oh Crap. More of this shit. Armstead May 2014 #36
Yes, same old poop, different day... bayareaboy May 2014 #41
K&R Louisiana1976 May 2014 #38
K&R for excellent political strategy. Anytime a policy hurts kids, it is bad policy McCamy Taylor May 2014 #44
Trickle Down, bay-bee! Even Obama "believes" it!!! blkmusclmachine May 2014 #46
Unpaid Work = $450 BILLION a year to replace mntleo2 May 2014 #50
I smell Karl Rove! nt Cryptoad May 2014 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We (and This Includes You...»Reply #50