Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert Parry: The State Department's Ukraine Fiasco [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)64. For starters, you attribute to Parry what RT wrote.
Which is what was known at the time. If you go from what Frontline reported last night, there's a propaganda war going on. From the footage that aired, I could see with my own eyes that there are murderers aplenty on both sides.
But, what really gets to me:
* Yanukovych fled after "neo-Nazi" militia seized government buildings on February 22nd. Not true. Yanukovych fled on the night of February 21-22, before police pulled back and the impeachment vote was had. He had actually been packing for two days before that, meaning that even as it relates to the initial negotiated deal that would have kept him in power but would have called for early elections--he apparently had no desire to stay in Ukraine and honor that.
If Parry wrote the guy left on Feb. 22 and you make it out like he was the night of Feb. 21/22, that is some catch you made.
Then there's:
* Russia never invaded Crimea because it already had troops there. False and disgustingly unprofessional journalism on Parry's part. Pre-annexation and pursuant to treaty, Russia had been allowed to keep its Soviet era naval base in Sevastapol, and naturally, Russia was allowed to have troops *ON THAT BASE*. That does not account for the well-armed and equipped uniformed men who appeared throughout Crimea and *OFF THE BASE* following the events in Maidan--troops Putin initially denied were Russian, but after annexation was achieved, he unequivocally admitted were in fact Russian military. Incredible chutzpah for Parry to lie about that.
Spin all you want, Russia owned Crimea. Most of the people in Crimea have Russian roots. Russia had troops defending its Naval base.
The United States has not done much to be proud of in the region. Boxing in Russia by converting its former fellow Soviet Republic states into allies, including Ukraine and its newly installed fascist regime, is not advancing the cause of world peace. It's moving the world toward war.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I'm in total disbelief that Parry was once considered a respectable investigative journalist.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#5
Yanukovych was not kidnapped, killed, arrested, or forcibly removed. He left on his own accord.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#21
The "Svoboda stormtroopers", whoever they were, did not force Yankovych to leave.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#84
Yanukovich still had complete control of his military and security forces, including the Berkut and
pampango
May 2014
#86
My position that he's a "hack" is my own statement of opinion based on facts I've gathered.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#19
Parry "found" jack shit. I doubt he's been in Ukraine over the past year, if at all.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#23
So if it's bullshit, do you have the evidence to bolster Parry's claims that I challenged?
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#42
Crimea was shuffled around by the Soviets from the Russian SSR to the Ukrainian SSR.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#75
Other than the countless times that I've mentioned I'm an unemployed student.
NuclearDem
May 2014
#80
I agree. Blaming the US for the Russian invasion is laughable and unsupportable.
stevenleser
May 2014
#18
Parry is one of the most respected US Journalists. And Nuland, we all know HER 'ties' btw, did way
sabrina 1
May 2014
#46
Robert Parry of 2014 runs a two-bit website. His columns on Ukraine are rehashed RT stories....
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#48
There was a coup in Ukraine, Parry is hardly the only one who recognizes that. Are you
sabrina 1
May 2014
#53
Yes, I am arguing that there was not a coup. "Coup" has a specific meaning....
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#55
Definitely fits all the definitions of a coup. Complete with the tapes of the plotters several
sabrina 1
May 2014
#57
I've taken to plugging in "military-industrial complex" everywhere I see "Neocon"
starroute
May 2014
#6
Agreed. Neocon Putin sent his head of the MIC to Syria to accept thanks from Assad
pampango
May 2014
#77
The day that Robert Parry is banned from this site, will be the day it has to declare itself
sabrina 1
May 2014
#51
Something you might not know about the timeline of events in February 2014.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#58
He also stated he was not leaving his post in a televised address *before* the controversial vote
newthinking
May 2014
#61
The coup timeline goes way further back than Feb. Yanukovych had no chance of being left in power,
sabrina 1
May 2014
#66
Coups involve an actual scheme and execution. You've shown none of that.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#74
'Some figures' in the West, included those that were exposed publicly, members of the State Dept.
sabrina 1
May 2014
#81
Simply repeating the word "coup" over and over again does not mean there was actually a coup.
Tommy_Carcetti
May 2014
#73
Getting involved in other peoples civil wars have been ever so successful before.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#63