General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Misogyny should not be tolerated on DU [View all]Violet_Crumble
(36,332 posts)I didn't jump to the defence of anyone. There was a guilt by association tactic being used, and I pointed out that guilt by association can be applied to HoF, as well as the Men's Group. And it was applied very heavily to HoF back when I was a host, and I copped a lot of guilt by association type accusations at the time, so I know how it feels.
Here. As yr still confused about what I said and what I meant, here's my initial reply that covers it all. Go back. Read it till it starts to sink in, because I don't think it's that complicated or anything. If yr still confused, feel free to ask questions and we'll work together to try to clear up any confusion on yr part. You may find that's far more constructive than sitting there telling me I meant something I didn't...
And there were a few of them who've been returning since then and being nuked for their persistence. Not to mention Iverglas, who's nuking message covered it all. So, smearing one group because of bigots who've been welcomed there is fraught with danger if yr not prepared to be just as critical of another group for the same thing with other bigots. My stance has always been that the whole guilt by association thing is lame, no matter if it's aimed at HoF or the Men's Group. btw, there's no MRA group at DU. Apart from being a former host and co-founder of HoF, I've posted every now and then in the Men's group, and know a few really nice blokes who post in there. There's stuff I don't like, but there's also stuff I don't like posted in other groups and forums at DU, so I think that MRA line was really lame...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5011098
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):