Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madinmaryland

(64,934 posts)
71. Oh fer fuck sakes. You try and compare the Clintons to....
Mon Jun 9, 2014, 09:30 PM
Jun 2014

Rmoney - Born on third base and thought he hit a triple.
George HW Bush - Born on third base and thought he hit a triple.
George W Bush - Born on third base and thought he hit a triple.
John McCain - Born on third base and thought he hit a triple.

Fuck them.

Ms. Clinton married a man who had no father and was raised by his mother and stepfather. The men listed above were raised by nannies and other support personnel.

Edited to add: Thank you to the late Ann Richards!

Bitter much? MineralMan Jun 2014 #1
Nope, not at all bitter. Projecting much? cali Jun 2014 #4
thats low PatrynXX Jun 2014 #163
I thought you were referring to the personal attack on Cali. Never mind n/t sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #177
Me too. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #219
Are you referring to cali when calling out bully? Or MM? rhett o rick Jun 2014 #298
MM and Cali both went ad hom, but MM did it first. Yet you give MM a +5 and call Cali a bully. merrily Jun 2014 #338
After the 2008 election ... butterfly77 Jun 2014 #316
Yes, and he agreed. merrily Jun 2014 #339
IOW, you don't know a fucking thing about what happened. aquart Jun 2014 #363
Care to address substance? And speaking of slimy innuendo, did you read your own post? merrily Jun 2014 #414
"It's top of the fold news." tiredtoo Jun 2014 #318
the perfect response azureblue Jun 2014 #345
The House in NY was 1.7 million...the house in DC was 5.4 million yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #402
She made the statements in 2014 krawhitham Jun 2014 #10
Unbelievable. 840high Jun 2014 #136
And th plight of the poor poor. No one's broker than the poor poor. merrily Jun 2014 #341
+1 Mineral Man treestar Jun 2014 #41
If she cant handle questions from Sawyer, hows she going to fare on Fox?? 7962 Jun 2014 #107
Do you seriously think she would do a fox interview? TiredOfNo Jun 2014 #129
Sorry, but she's being interviewed by Van Sustren & Brett Baeir on Fox. Where ya been? 7962 Jun 2014 #133
Yes she would. 840high Jun 2014 #137
She can handle them just fine. Beacool Jun 2014 #262
Just think if they had asked her what she reads! Fuddnik Jun 2014 #358
I admire you MM customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #115
She could have told her story with more poliltical sensitivity. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #122
Bitter? Hell Yeah!!! billhicks76 Jun 2014 #126
Do facts matter at all in this discussion? What does Cali's opinion have to do with the facts? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #175
She looks like an idiot saying that! And you want to deny it? nt Logical Jun 2014 #207
This is not the time for criticism because it's not election time... Hissyspit Jun 2014 #210
+1 Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #293
A list of approved discussion topics pinned to the top of each forum would help morningfog Jun 2014 #222
lulz : ) Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #367
... woo me with science Jun 2014 #225
Of course the H. Clinton-Sachs supporters want us to give her rhett o rick Jun 2014 #300
For many of us, 2014 has been decided. None of my senators are running. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #308
Excellent point thank you. EOM tiredtoo Jun 2014 #317
Right there with you MM Tommy2Tone Jun 2014 #336
Hear, hear! We have precincts to walk and phone banks to bank (?) genwah Jun 2014 #351
Yes, we do. Anything that distracts from that MineralMan Jun 2014 #353
Gracias, mi compadre. Let's bring the fight to them. I'm tired of this chickenshit. genwah Jun 2014 #394
Didn't she get a few million for "It Takes A Village"? HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #2
Yes. Before leaving the WH. The first comment in this thread cali Jun 2014 #7
1996. NYT best seller list. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #19
That money went to charity. pnwmom Jun 2014 #101
A portion of it did. Whisp Jun 2014 #199
And the rest went to taxes. n/t pnwmom Jun 2014 #201
Let's be clear. They didn't keep a dime, and that is what that article says. nt MADem Jun 2014 #209
I think that is the law - it was income and they gave the entire after tax portion karynnj Jun 2014 #259
They had staggering legal bills. AngryAmish Jun 2014 #94
YES! THANK YOU! lolly Jun 2014 #322
All the profits from that book WENT TO CHARITY. You could have looked that up, you know. MADem Jun 2014 #100
they fact check about as well as Fox News Skittles Jun 2014 #111
It says 840K "of proceeds" went to charity. Didnt she get an 8 million advance to write it? 7962 Jun 2014 #132
Are you completely CONFUSED? Why are you mixing up her "Village" book with her MADem Jun 2014 #140
Well, shoot, if thats the case they darn sure shouldve had some money? 7962 Jun 2014 #155
They had enormous legal bills from the forty four million dollars worth of taxpayer cash used MADem Jun 2014 #164
Depends on the crowed you run with. zeemike Jun 2014 #169
When she bought the house she didn't have that money. MADem Jun 2014 #178
No job, broke, I know honey let's buy a house! A Simple Game Jun 2014 #334
She didn't keep any of the money from It takes a Village. Beacool Jun 2014 #266
Plagirism on It Takes A Village?: Whisp Jun 2014 #305
"Did not acknowledge ghostwriter Barbara Feinman" rock Jun 2014 #327
+1 krawhitham Jun 2014 #3
The GOP broke them with lawyer expenses. nt onehandle Jun 2014 #5
no, they weren't broke. In any case her comments were in defense cali Jun 2014 #8
so much anger. n/t progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #72
Don't look now, but your agenda is showing. Beacool Jun 2014 #269
...yet they were able to purchase not one, but TWO houses. Maedhros Jun 2014 #67
Mitt & Anne sold stock while he was a student elehhhhna Jun 2014 #84
LMFAO lawyers going broke over money going to ....lawyers. L0oniX Jun 2014 #366
Damn, I'd like to be the kind of "broke" where an Ivy education and plural houses aren't laughable. LeftyMom Jun 2014 #6
indeed. cali Jun 2014 #9
Not any more interesting than the dreck you're peddling LordGlenconner Jun 2014 #119
Hillary's own words are the dreck that's being peddled frylock Jun 2014 #303
I said about the same thing where a similar post showed up in Politics 2014 nt LiberalElite Jun 2014 #12
No kidding. I'm not envious. I just wish she was a little more tuned in so as not to say something Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #65
Most Congress people own property in their districts because they are required to pnwmom Jun 2014 #103
No, and I'm not going to do your homework for you. Read the damn thread. nt LeftyMom Jun 2014 #104
I was changing my post while you were cussing me out. pnwmom Jun 2014 #105
. st17011864200074656 Jun 2014 #197
You have residency by having a residence there. pnwmom Jun 2014 #198
And pray tell, where should she have lived while working in DC? Beacool Jun 2014 #270
Hillary had a job in DC when they left the White House? A Simple Game Jun 2014 #343
Are you for real????????? Beacool Jun 2014 #362
Of course I'm for real, so I screwed up, big deal that only means that A Simple Game Jun 2014 #395
Me too. And so would all the people who lost their jobs and their homes to Wall St. Corruption. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #187
This was after then-president Clinton RainDog Jun 2014 #11
Damn she sounds a lot like ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #13
yea... Ann Romney. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #14
they had lived out of the gov mansion in Arkansas so they did need a home bigtree Jun 2014 #15
When you get an 8 million dollar advance BEFORE leaving the WH cali Jun 2014 #16
show me the debt to income/asset ratio bigtree Jun 2014 #18
uh, no, honey, I'm not making up a thing: cali Jun 2014 #29
so what's the acceptable level of income for them? bigtree Jun 2014 #51
she's trying to identify with people who are struggling to get by cali Jun 2014 #64
she said that 'it's not easy' bigtree Jun 2014 #78
oh. so you are a mindreader, too? azureblue Jun 2014 #344
and snotty answers are your metier. You didn't even provide the information requested. KittyWampus Jun 2014 #68
and the question was about her current and recent past speaking fees. cali Jun 2014 #116
Not quite true customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #131
They bought the house BEFORE they left the WH. MADem Jun 2014 #182
Did I talk about the house customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #186
Where did I "assert there was a gap?" MADem Jun 2014 #188
You are correct customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #192
You do realize that no bank would give them a loan? It wasn't a matter of "clearing escrow." MADem Jun 2014 #203
OK, you're missing my point customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #221
No there was NOT. YOU are missing MY point. MADem Jun 2014 #232
Between her salary as a Senator and his salary as President davidpdx Jun 2014 #215
She did not start earning that salary as a Senator until AFTER he left the WH. MADem Jun 2014 #234
MADem, just Duval Jun 2014 #340
I guess so--I've never seen anything like it. MADem Jun 2014 #350
its hard to feel bad about their fees because if old bill had kept his pants on they roguevalley Jun 2014 #91
Excuse me?????? Beacool Jun 2014 #275
About half of that went to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes, pnwmom Jun 2014 #375
No. It's that Bill Clinton led the reform to harm poor people RainDog Jun 2014 #17
sorry, I lived through and raised my family during the Clinton years bigtree Jun 2014 #22
it's not nonsense RainDog Jun 2014 #25
reality bigtree Jun 2014 #34
reality: that was the dot com boom RainDog Jun 2014 #45
The eitc increase and the child tax credit and the subtantial hike in the minumum wage Vattel Jun 2014 #58
four words bigtree Jun 2014 #59
Okay. I stand corrected. RainDog Jun 2014 #60
I think that was the decade we lost the textile industry in this country. nt eilen Jun 2014 #346
Here's a tidbit of facts that might make you pull your blinders off truedelphi Jun 2014 #32
you mean after he left office? what a joke bigtree Jun 2014 #40
Plus...all expenses paid to and from speeches, and for staffers needed, etc. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2014 #50
Ummm... that was after they were out of the White House. nt progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #73
Oh like asking people to get a job after being on welfare for a few years?? progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #70
Dependence is a cancer on society, they say. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #147
I have never experienced poverty RainDog Jun 2014 #153
If I remember correctly... ohheckyeah Jun 2014 #150
No, he didn't loan them the money, but he helped them get the loan. MADem Jun 2014 #176
It is just tone deaf, in the same way that the comments of many Republicans with money often are Ms. Toad Jun 2014 #231
+ 1,000 suffragette Jun 2014 #243
This........ Beacool Jun 2014 #274
This is all to counter the populism Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #20
Yeah, because Bill Clinton was born wealthy. Beacool Jun 2014 #277
No, because Hillary Clinton was born poor. ieoeja Jun 2014 #315
Why "defend" it loyalsister Jun 2014 #21
While definitely a tone deaf statement, it is true. tritsofme Jun 2014 #23
If you had $10 but owed $11., you'd be dead broke wyldwolf Jun 2014 #24
uh, no. no, you wouldn't be dead broke in the sense that regular people struggle with it. cali Jun 2014 #30
uh, sure you would wyldwolf Jun 2014 #38
I love breaking this to you, but then I am not a hypocrite or a fabulist: cali Jun 2014 #42
You're living in the past wyldwolf Jun 2014 #49
you do know that little saying about those who don't learn from history, right? cali Jun 2014 #110
His post at number 55 was hidden SIXTEEN MINUTES before you posted this--he cannot reply to you. MADem Jun 2014 #127
There is nothing wrong with responding to someone who gets locked out of a thread morningfog Jun 2014 #223
It depends on what you SAY. MADem Jun 2014 #230
So alert and let the jury decide. morningfog Jun 2014 #248
It seems to me that everyone in this thread is saying what they please. Demit Jun 2014 #146
Bullshit, indeed. Some perhaps need to experience 'dead broke' to understand Purveyor Jun 2014 #39
Good point customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #139
It's hilarious(ly sad) the lengths people will go to attack the Clintons. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #86
Sorry, not a statement of fact customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #148
Yes, it is a statement of fact. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #168
The Clintons had more than just fancy educations customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #174
Of course this thread would have existed. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #180
Nice job of swinging to the opposite extreme customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #183
Hear, hear!!! Beacool Jun 2014 #284
Remember the outrage... uberblonde Jun 2014 #381
Good point. Beacool Jun 2014 #382
My point being... uberblonde Jun 2014 #383
Well, that we knew already. Beacool Jun 2014 #387
They were not looking to break our hearts. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #26
They were saddled with legal expenses. However, it didn't take long to replenish with speaking fees. RBInMaine Jun 2014 #27
No. And it is an issue. It's a top of the fold issue. cali Jun 2014 #33
The phrase is "above the fold." Demit Jun 2014 #149
By mentioning her supposed poverty customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #160
Yes, what she said about being broke was in response betsuni Jun 2014 #213
Her comments have been completely taken out of context by those looking for anything to bash her Metric System Jun 2014 #214
Yes--Republicans and allies have spun this masterfully lolly Jun 2014 #326
You are Trump and Clinton broke? HangOnKids Jun 2014 #217
Never had money and lost it or been in debt and I am not Trump or Clinton, so no betsuni Jun 2014 #239
More pile on of Clinton. It does not matter what she says Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #28
Coming from a staunch John Edwards fan like Cali, her OP is hysterical wyldwolf Jun 2014 #31
are you kidding? stop making shit up. I was the MOST anti- JE person on DU cali Jun 2014 #37
Bad news for you: wyldwolf Jun 2014 #47
you are a piece of work. cali Jun 2014 #48
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #55
that x100000 ^ nt progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #76
That x 10000000000000000 that the post got hidden HangOnKids Jun 2014 #124
Interesting that you liked that post that much. Scuba Jun 2014 #142
Gotta back cali up there BeyondGeography Jun 2014 #229
Well, poor Hillary has some experience ducking snipers...oh, wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #56
Wow.. taken directly from the FR talking point? classy. nt progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #79
No, taken directly from Hillary's lying mouth. n/t Whisp Jun 2014 #123
Hillary's own words frylock Jun 2014 #181
It was HRC's fictional construction - not a FR talking point.... xocet Jun 2014 #352
I sometimes wonder what site I've wandered onto... progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #75
some of us here are actually progressive dems who don't like war mongerers. Hillary is one. cali Jun 2014 #117
How is she a war monger? Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #159
More recently, according to her, truebluegreen Jun 2014 #238
Snarky Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #246
How many times did the White House have to disavowal itself from her statements at State? ieoeja Jun 2014 #320
Thanks for the info. I didn't know that about Special Envoy. Whisp Jun 2014 #324
What info? Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #384
I like being snarky. That said, the subject was Clinton. truebluegreen Jun 2014 #356
No. It was about Clinton being a hawk and Obama disagreeing Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #385
No. The discussion was about whether or not Clinton is a warmonger. truebluegreen Jun 2014 #398
Elitism is elitism Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #290
I ask myself that question every day. Beacool Jun 2014 #286
Yes, except in this case, she put her own foot in her own mouth. hughee99 Jun 2014 #252
They were millions in debt due to legal bills treestar Jun 2014 #35
It was avoidable customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #162
It could also have been avoided if Republicans had not tried to use it treestar Jun 2014 #184
You have to expect customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #190
Ken Starr spent tens of millions going after them. joshcryer Jun 2014 #355
The special prosecutor had investigated the Clintons for several years Beacool Jun 2014 #289
I'd sure like to see a breakdown customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #409
It's said that more money was spent on Clinton's year long lie Whisp Jun 2014 #413
Sometimes I miss the unrec button. liberalmuse Jun 2014 #36
You all have pretty much covered it, smile. oldandhappy Jun 2014 #43
More Clinton disingenuous bullshit tularetom Jun 2014 #44
Yes, and I'm guessing there was not a single person in that team of bullwinkle428 Jun 2014 #61
That does not negate the fact that they were millions in debt Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #92
But it does negate the "it was hard" part. Maedhros Jun 2014 #309
The Koch boys are already making film on how 'dead broke' she and Bill Purveyor Jun 2014 #46
"Will speak at Goldman Sachs for food..and $200,000". Sad story. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #52
Well, at least your cynical remark got me to chuckle. truedelphi Jun 2014 #154
LOL! nt laundry_queen Jun 2014 #206
For those who still care about actual facts.... uberblonde Jun 2014 #53
that has nothing to do with the tone deaf element cali Jun 2014 #63
Here's a fact. If I were to grant that she was indeed broke because of cost of legal representation Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #158
Sadly, there are too few of those in this pile. MADem Jun 2014 #237
I don't know if I see this OP as "claws out" or even something that would not be allowed karynnj Jun 2014 #276
Perception.... MADem Jun 2014 #292
If the article is correct, the Clintons NOT being reimbursed was part of the deal that there karynnj Jun 2014 #306
It was just an $8 million advance. Motown_Johnny Jun 2014 #54
She's doomed now. JoePhilly Jun 2014 #57
Good lord! Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #62
as I said: tone deaf. cali Jun 2014 #66
it's practically like skipping a couple meals waiting for the next welfare check to arrive.. frylock Jun 2014 #311
Ah thanks for reminding me why I left DU around the elections... progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #69
We don't hate Hillary customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #167
Yes, they DO hate the Clintons. Beacool Jun 2014 #283
Oh fer fuck sakes. You try and compare the Clintons to.... madinmaryland Jun 2014 #71
what??? where do I compare them to the Romneys? I DO NOT. cali Jun 2014 #83
BUT YOU SHOULD BE. What you posted is just not really relevant. madinmaryland Jun 2014 #89
That's what I was thinking betsuni Jun 2014 #179
"Tone deaf" doesn't begin to describe Hillary. When you have the Presidential pension .... Scuba Jun 2014 #74
I have no problem with the OP or the discussion of it Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #77
When I'm flat broke, I stop answering my phone and I stop opening mail because I have nothing Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #80
Holy Crap - I didn't get the memo! It's now time to start discrediting Hillary? Yes, I guess it's AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2014 #81
... and 'borrowing' right wing talking points to do it with. wyldwolf Jun 2014 #82
weak sauce, wolf. you call all criticism of Hillary or Obama "right wing". transparent and cali Jun 2014 #87
the OP, post 56, post 45 - ALL right wing knocks wyldwolf Jun 2014 #90
Well, of course the reich wing is going to seize on it customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #170
your sticking up for Hillary doesn't match your screenname m-lekktor Jun 2014 #251
Yeah, you're right. Who do you think I should support? Rand? Jeb? Romney? Cruz? GEEEEZZZ... AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2014 #361
Oh, boy ... It's going to be a long two years. 1000words Jun 2014 #85
+1 QuestForSense Jun 2014 #144
. boston bean Jun 2014 #88
Broke and no opportunities. Oh, wait. Broke and all the opportunities in the world. nt valerief Jun 2014 #93
This. That's why it's so incredibly tone deaf. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #95
The Clintons never had to worry about where their next meal was coming from. "Broke." HA !!! blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #118
An $8 million book advance plus her husband's and montly pension (plus expenses) dflprincess Jun 2014 #96
The book money went to charity. And they didn't own any real estate pnwmom Jun 2014 #109
Guess it's time to downsize. I'm guessing a 3 bedroom ranch in the burbs on a 1/4 acre would serve Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #113
Her NY home IS in the burbs. Do you have any idea what homes like that cost in Hillary's district? pnwmom Jun 2014 #120
No, I'm not terribly concerned. I'm positive the burbs have affordable homes for firefighters and Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #130
If they were "in debt" why would they give the book money to charity? tularetom Jun 2014 #135
Almost all Senators have homes in their local districts because they have to pnwmom Jun 2014 #138
Generally people who are "dead broke" dflprincess Jun 2014 #397
Can you spell distraction? blue neen Jun 2014 #97
She's sounding like Romney. Geez. Maybe we need a Democratic challenger. Kablooie Jun 2014 #98
It is entirely conceivable to me that with four years of Stanford (@ around $200K) pnwmom Jun 2014 #99
Entitled. blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #125
So, when they made a six figure salary for 8 years, they had NO house payment? joeglow3 Jun 2014 #267
A big chunk of that salary went to taxes -- this was before the Bush tax cuts. pnwmom Jun 2014 #268
As a Tax CPA, I can assure you there taxes were not that high joeglow3 Jun 2014 #282
As a person who pays taxes, and can Google, I can assure you pnwmom Jun 2014 #288
Oh, so since they CHOSE to send their daughter to an expensive school joeglow3 Jun 2014 #310
Do you realize that they've set up a charitable foundation? pnwmom Jun 2014 #329
Are you going to praise them as much as we do every other charitable foundation here joeglow3 Jun 2014 #331
Bill Clinton spent most of his career making $35K a year as the governor of a small state. pnwmom Jun 2014 #333
how about perks? I bet a President gets some of those... Whisp Jun 2014 #337
Most people are making 35k today AND pay for a house with utilities joeglow3 Jun 2014 #354
Zero living expenses? Wrong. He had all the regular living expenses except housing pnwmom Jun 2014 #374
Because they are hypocrites. Beacool Jun 2014 #291
Well, she doesn't have a very good record for veracity tularetom Jun 2014 #102
I can't seem to confabulate dodging sniper fire... Whisp Jun 2014 #319
Dead broke, but, never mind, they had friends with benefits. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #106
Her political acumen is greatly overstated. She has never won a seriously contested race and is TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #393
Agree. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #399
An out-of-touch 1%'er, to the core. blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #108
yes. precisely. but isn't the outrage of her devotees interesting? cali Jun 2014 #112
Yes. bvar22 Jun 2014 #280
+1 leftstreet Jun 2014 #143
Complete with a complaint about how some of the money went to taxes loyalsister Jun 2014 #220
She has very much been against a tax increase. See; Hillary v Obama debate and the subject of how Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #233
that WAS dumb DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #235
+10000 woo me with science Jun 2014 #227
Yep, it must've been tough Hillary ... CountAllVotes Jun 2014 #114
Well you can hardly expect her to live as we JoeyT Jun 2014 #121
Compared to all her friends, that is dead broke LittleBlue Jun 2014 #128
There's a difference between being broke and being poor. TeamPooka Jun 2014 #134
Not to the ears of poor Americans who have little frame of reference to make that distinction. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #141
The ones that support the policies of the rich because they think they are or will be someday? TeamPooka Jun 2014 #145
You're describing republicans. She won't be courting their votes. I'm talking about people like my Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #152
Your argument assumes she is worried about courting Democratic Party voters. She is already TeamPooka Jun 2014 #347
Yes loyalsister Jun 2014 #332
That does not explain away why she has recently taken money from Sachs Whisp Jun 2014 #151
Are you capable of separating facts from your opinion? uberblonde Jun 2014 #156
No. Missing meals would have been the practical manifestation of broke. Making a sacrifice Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #173
Broke does not equal poor. Gidney N Cloyd Jun 2014 #157
I think Hillary should do us all a favor and forget about running for President. lumpy Jun 2014 #161
When you're a part of a royal couple that went to great lengths to truedelphi Jun 2014 #171
This. ^ AzDar Jun 2014 #196
I must reluctantly agree. navarth Jun 2014 #321
Bullshit! The Clintons didn't stab the middle class in the back AllTooEasy Jun 2014 #376
DURING the eight years of Clinton's reign, it is true that truedelphi Jun 2014 #412
Bullshit again! 2008's crisis was Clinton's fault AllTooEasy Jun 2014 #415
Please read up on the economic collapse. truedelphi Jun 2014 #416
I agree that the Banking Reform and Modernization Act was awful, but... AllTooEasy Jun 2014 #417
Gore did not even have the guts to fight for the vote count in Florida. truedelphi Jun 2014 #418
I disagree AllTooEasy Jul 2014 #419
just flat busted ell oh ell frylock Jun 2014 #165
You are only as broke as the resources you DON'T have. They had a lot of resources. YOHABLO Jun 2014 #166
Her timing is impeccable. joshcryer Jun 2014 #172
No, she has just given the GOP a present that will be opened again and again. djean111 Jun 2014 #189
The GOP can't run against making money. joshcryer Jun 2014 #191
The GOP will run against the hypocrisy. The GOP is quite offended when any Democrat djean111 Jun 2014 #194
They can't afford to. joshcryer Jun 2014 #195
You are using logic. They will not. djean111 Jun 2014 #200
The only thing the Democrat has to worry about is the left. joshcryer Jun 2014 #205
Ah. I see that the Left is already being set up as a whipping boy in some quarters. djean111 Jun 2014 #244
Newt on crossfire today sure did run with it. joshcryer Jun 2014 #369
I don't really think conflating not liking Hillary with being all newtie-minded is gonna work djean111 Jun 2014 #370
Breitbart is running with it. joshcryer Jun 2014 #371
Grayson is not being shoved down our throats as if the primaries were a foregone conclusion. djean111 Jun 2014 #388
Not from dems using right wing talking points. joshcryer Jun 2014 #389
What, exactly, is right wing about saying Hillary was tone deaf with the "broke" thing? djean111 Jun 2014 #390
You agree with Newt's view. joshcryer Jun 2014 #391
Wow. That is really a reach. And a spin. Good luck with that. djean111 Jun 2014 #403
It came about from her book. joshcryer Jun 2014 #404
Don't need your permission to bookmark, my dear. Condescension does not accomplish anything good, djean111 Jun 2014 #406
No, I appreciate the timing. joshcryer Jun 2014 #407
I pity those without political foresight. joshcryer Jun 2014 #408
Uh, why raise it at all? Union Scribe Jun 2014 #202
Raise it early, raise it often. joshcryer Jun 2014 #204
This is The Onion, yes? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #185
could be, but it's not. cali Jun 2014 #211
i remember MFM008 Jun 2014 #193
I seriously wonder what this place would have looked like.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2014 #208
I don't think you could be more off the mark if you tried. cali Jun 2014 #212
Yes. You know, I'm generally not ever going to leave here to be critical of Mrs. Clinton. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #218
Very true, and very very well stated. Thank you. djean111 Jun 2014 #245
Thank you. I often get lost in the critique and fail to make the argument as to why Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #249
Yes, I've already seen several comments about Bill keeping his pants zipped. Beacool Jun 2014 #299
Yeah I agree davidpdx Jun 2014 #216
Yeah, pretty tone deaf. NCTraveler Jun 2014 #224
Well, at least she did not say they were "homeless" for the hour it took to move out of the WH. CBGLuthier Jun 2014 #226
Broke for the rich is different than broke for the rest of us liberal N proud Jun 2014 #228
don't worry DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #236
I imagine people who are subsistence farmers in the sub-Sahara feel the same way about you and I... LanternWaste Jun 2014 #240
Calli...As a person living in poverty DearAbby Jun 2014 #241
I think Hillary could throw a naked baby onto a frozen lake and she would have defenders snooper2 Jun 2014 #242
I think Hillary could find the cure for cancer and she would have detractors. Beacool Jun 2014 #297
Maybe they were broke but were they ever in danger of being homeless? CrispyQ Jun 2014 #247
Gasp! The horror! raouldukelives Jun 2014 #250
That's my kind of broke, baby! Iggo Jun 2014 #253
Tone deaf is absolutely correct, but it likely was technically accurate - if only briefly karynnj Jun 2014 #254
“Let me just clarify that I fully appreciate how hard life is for so many Americans today,” PoliticAverse Jun 2014 #255
keep working really hard, all ya slackers out there. Whisp Jun 2014 #260
The lady doth clarify too much and too often. Whisp Jun 2014 #314
Only someone with incredible earnings power could go as broke as HRC dirtydickcheney Jun 2014 #256
From your link: Whisp Jun 2014 #264
I would call ~$10 million in debt "dead broke" MohRokTah Jun 2014 #257
Remember that time............ fredamae Jun 2014 #258
What do you call a $12M debt? Beacool Jun 2014 #261
you miss the point. entirely. she gaffed. the press is having a field day and so are the repubs cali Jun 2014 #263
She doesn't need your help. Beacool Jun 2014 #265
but Hillary Does need help. Whisp Jun 2014 #271
You have zero clue about Hillary. Beacool Jun 2014 #272
Oh yes I do. Hillary leaves clues around all over. Whisp Jun 2014 #273
Yes, she does. Iggo Jun 2014 #285
No, she doesn't need the help of a few disgruntled people on the internet Beacool Jun 2014 #294
Yes, she does. Iggo Jun 2014 #301
"She doesn't need you." Sort of sums up their thinking, doesn't it? n/t ieoeja Jun 2014 #325
So many on DU seem distraught that DURHAM D Jun 2014 #281
Yep, they seem to have preferred the alternative. Beacool Jun 2014 #295
Thank you, DURHAM D Duval Jun 2014 #342
She will probably admit some time in the future, Doctor_J Jun 2014 #278
Hillary Clinton is not only tone-deaf; she's also a serial offender RufusTFirefly Jun 2014 #279
Bill's lovers are trash, but Bill is still cool: Whisp Jun 2014 #287
Well, she was just stating facts. Beacool Jun 2014 #296
How about the disastrous furlough of Willie Horton? Wasn't that also a fact? RufusTFirefly Jun 2014 #302
LOL DURHAM D Jun 2014 #304
And in 2008 when talking about raising the cap for payroll taxes, she appeared to claim that JDPriestly Jun 2014 #307
It's like hearing someone say they know the plight of the homeless because they're in escrow. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2014 #312
or because they are at the mall and not at home... Whisp Jun 2014 #313
I'm divided on this because I do think Hillary is out of touch. But spreading Republican talking DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #323
I really admire Hillary Clinton, I really do Harry Monroe Jun 2014 #328
Let's break this down azureblue Jun 2014 #330
Can we just say the Clinton's weren't flush? Tommy2Tone Jun 2014 #335
I do not support her. There are far better people out there. Genuine liberals. EEO Jun 2014 #348
This kind of reminds of this women I know eilen Jun 2014 #349
oh, no, cali....now you're on the Clinton frenemy list!!!! nt antigop Jun 2014 #357
Dead Broke? strange7 Jun 2014 #359
Hilarity's Thespian2 Jun 2014 #360
This rec's for you Capt. Obvious Jun 2014 #364
She should have some tea and cookies with Ann ...they can both complain about "you people"... L0oniX Jun 2014 #365
Poor financial planning is her explanation? DeSwiss Jun 2014 #368
very interesting point. wonder if the RW talking heads will pick it up maggiesfarmer Jun 2014 #380
HILLARY should have thought of that. NOT OUR JOB to spin and twist whatever she says so it djean111 Jun 2014 #405
While Bill was Gov.;Hill was named partner @ law firm; made more $$$ than he did Divernan Jun 2014 #372
"We were broke" = "I'm trying to find a way to connect with the common citizen" nt NorthCarolina Jun 2014 #373
Broke? Like searching under sofa cushions for loose change 4 kids' milk money? Divernan Jun 2014 #377
Well probably not THAT kind of broke exactly. NorthCarolina Jun 2014 #410
Oh noes, a woman made some money in politics MyNameGoesHere Jun 2014 #378
that's what you took away from this? Sad. And guess what, I'm a feminist and that's the sole cali Jun 2014 #392
Hillary is no feminist, she Uses Feminism when it suits her. n/t Whisp Jun 2014 #396
No feminist I know would stay with a serial philanderer. Divernan Jun 2014 #400
tangent: "tone deaf" is the wrong phrase maggiesfarmer Jun 2014 #379
Hillary has NEVER been dead broke Amaya Jun 2014 #386
Amen, sister! Divernan Jun 2014 #401
Ex-presidents get retirement pay of about $200,000 per year currently Crabby Appleton Jun 2014 #411
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can you spell tone deaf? ...»Reply #71