Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
282. As a Tax CPA, I can assure you there taxes were not that high
Tue Jun 10, 2014, 11:58 AM
Jun 2014

Last edited Tue Jun 10, 2014, 01:42 PM - Edit history (1)

Good to know you were concerned though. Amazing that my drywaller father was able to send three kids to college prep high schools AND make a house payment on MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH less than the poor Clintons during that time frame.

Edit to add, we did not qualify for financial aid.

Bitter much? MineralMan Jun 2014 #1
Nope, not at all bitter. Projecting much? cali Jun 2014 #4
thats low PatrynXX Jun 2014 #163
I thought you were referring to the personal attack on Cali. Never mind n/t sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #177
Me too. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #219
Are you referring to cali when calling out bully? Or MM? rhett o rick Jun 2014 #298
MM and Cali both went ad hom, but MM did it first. Yet you give MM a +5 and call Cali a bully. merrily Jun 2014 #338
After the 2008 election ... butterfly77 Jun 2014 #316
Yes, and he agreed. merrily Jun 2014 #339
IOW, you don't know a fucking thing about what happened. aquart Jun 2014 #363
Care to address substance? And speaking of slimy innuendo, did you read your own post? merrily Jun 2014 #414
"It's top of the fold news." tiredtoo Jun 2014 #318
the perfect response azureblue Jun 2014 #345
The House in NY was 1.7 million...the house in DC was 5.4 million yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #402
She made the statements in 2014 krawhitham Jun 2014 #10
Unbelievable. 840high Jun 2014 #136
And th plight of the poor poor. No one's broker than the poor poor. merrily Jun 2014 #341
+1 Mineral Man treestar Jun 2014 #41
If she cant handle questions from Sawyer, hows she going to fare on Fox?? 7962 Jun 2014 #107
Do you seriously think she would do a fox interview? TiredOfNo Jun 2014 #129
Sorry, but she's being interviewed by Van Sustren & Brett Baeir on Fox. Where ya been? 7962 Jun 2014 #133
Yes she would. 840high Jun 2014 #137
She can handle them just fine. Beacool Jun 2014 #262
Just think if they had asked her what she reads! Fuddnik Jun 2014 #358
I admire you MM customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #115
She could have told her story with more poliltical sensitivity. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #122
Bitter? Hell Yeah!!! billhicks76 Jun 2014 #126
Do facts matter at all in this discussion? What does Cali's opinion have to do with the facts? sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #175
She looks like an idiot saying that! And you want to deny it? nt Logical Jun 2014 #207
This is not the time for criticism because it's not election time... Hissyspit Jun 2014 #210
+1 Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #293
A list of approved discussion topics pinned to the top of each forum would help morningfog Jun 2014 #222
lulz : ) Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #367
... woo me with science Jun 2014 #225
Of course the H. Clinton-Sachs supporters want us to give her rhett o rick Jun 2014 #300
For many of us, 2014 has been decided. None of my senators are running. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #308
Excellent point thank you. EOM tiredtoo Jun 2014 #317
Right there with you MM Tommy2Tone Jun 2014 #336
Hear, hear! We have precincts to walk and phone banks to bank (?) genwah Jun 2014 #351
Yes, we do. Anything that distracts from that MineralMan Jun 2014 #353
Gracias, mi compadre. Let's bring the fight to them. I'm tired of this chickenshit. genwah Jun 2014 #394
Didn't she get a few million for "It Takes A Village"? HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #2
Yes. Before leaving the WH. The first comment in this thread cali Jun 2014 #7
1996. NYT best seller list. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #19
That money went to charity. pnwmom Jun 2014 #101
A portion of it did. Whisp Jun 2014 #199
And the rest went to taxes. n/t pnwmom Jun 2014 #201
Let's be clear. They didn't keep a dime, and that is what that article says. nt MADem Jun 2014 #209
I think that is the law - it was income and they gave the entire after tax portion karynnj Jun 2014 #259
They had staggering legal bills. AngryAmish Jun 2014 #94
YES! THANK YOU! lolly Jun 2014 #322
All the profits from that book WENT TO CHARITY. You could have looked that up, you know. MADem Jun 2014 #100
they fact check about as well as Fox News Skittles Jun 2014 #111
It says 840K "of proceeds" went to charity. Didnt she get an 8 million advance to write it? 7962 Jun 2014 #132
Are you completely CONFUSED? Why are you mixing up her "Village" book with her MADem Jun 2014 #140
Well, shoot, if thats the case they darn sure shouldve had some money? 7962 Jun 2014 #155
They had enormous legal bills from the forty four million dollars worth of taxpayer cash used MADem Jun 2014 #164
Depends on the crowed you run with. zeemike Jun 2014 #169
When she bought the house she didn't have that money. MADem Jun 2014 #178
No job, broke, I know honey let's buy a house! A Simple Game Jun 2014 #334
She didn't keep any of the money from It takes a Village. Beacool Jun 2014 #266
Plagirism on It Takes A Village?: Whisp Jun 2014 #305
"Did not acknowledge ghostwriter Barbara Feinman" rock Jun 2014 #327
+1 krawhitham Jun 2014 #3
The GOP broke them with lawyer expenses. nt onehandle Jun 2014 #5
no, they weren't broke. In any case her comments were in defense cali Jun 2014 #8
so much anger. n/t progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #72
Don't look now, but your agenda is showing. Beacool Jun 2014 #269
...yet they were able to purchase not one, but TWO houses. Maedhros Jun 2014 #67
Mitt & Anne sold stock while he was a student elehhhhna Jun 2014 #84
LMFAO lawyers going broke over money going to ....lawyers. L0oniX Jun 2014 #366
Damn, I'd like to be the kind of "broke" where an Ivy education and plural houses aren't laughable. LeftyMom Jun 2014 #6
indeed. cali Jun 2014 #9
Not any more interesting than the dreck you're peddling LordGlenconner Jun 2014 #119
Hillary's own words are the dreck that's being peddled frylock Jun 2014 #303
I said about the same thing where a similar post showed up in Politics 2014 nt LiberalElite Jun 2014 #12
No kidding. I'm not envious. I just wish she was a little more tuned in so as not to say something Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #65
Most Congress people own property in their districts because they are required to pnwmom Jun 2014 #103
No, and I'm not going to do your homework for you. Read the damn thread. nt LeftyMom Jun 2014 #104
I was changing my post while you were cussing me out. pnwmom Jun 2014 #105
. st17011864200074656 Jun 2014 #197
You have residency by having a residence there. pnwmom Jun 2014 #198
And pray tell, where should she have lived while working in DC? Beacool Jun 2014 #270
Hillary had a job in DC when they left the White House? A Simple Game Jun 2014 #343
Are you for real????????? Beacool Jun 2014 #362
Of course I'm for real, so I screwed up, big deal that only means that A Simple Game Jun 2014 #395
Me too. And so would all the people who lost their jobs and their homes to Wall St. Corruption. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #187
This was after then-president Clinton RainDog Jun 2014 #11
Damn she sounds a lot like ... GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #13
yea... Ann Romney. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #14
they had lived out of the gov mansion in Arkansas so they did need a home bigtree Jun 2014 #15
When you get an 8 million dollar advance BEFORE leaving the WH cali Jun 2014 #16
show me the debt to income/asset ratio bigtree Jun 2014 #18
uh, no, honey, I'm not making up a thing: cali Jun 2014 #29
so what's the acceptable level of income for them? bigtree Jun 2014 #51
she's trying to identify with people who are struggling to get by cali Jun 2014 #64
she said that 'it's not easy' bigtree Jun 2014 #78
oh. so you are a mindreader, too? azureblue Jun 2014 #344
and snotty answers are your metier. You didn't even provide the information requested. KittyWampus Jun 2014 #68
and the question was about her current and recent past speaking fees. cali Jun 2014 #116
Not quite true customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #131
They bought the house BEFORE they left the WH. MADem Jun 2014 #182
Did I talk about the house customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #186
Where did I "assert there was a gap?" MADem Jun 2014 #188
You are correct customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #192
You do realize that no bank would give them a loan? It wasn't a matter of "clearing escrow." MADem Jun 2014 #203
OK, you're missing my point customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #221
No there was NOT. YOU are missing MY point. MADem Jun 2014 #232
Between her salary as a Senator and his salary as President davidpdx Jun 2014 #215
She did not start earning that salary as a Senator until AFTER he left the WH. MADem Jun 2014 #234
MADem, just Duval Jun 2014 #340
I guess so--I've never seen anything like it. MADem Jun 2014 #350
its hard to feel bad about their fees because if old bill had kept his pants on they roguevalley Jun 2014 #91
Excuse me?????? Beacool Jun 2014 #275
About half of that went to income, Social Security, and Medicare taxes, pnwmom Jun 2014 #375
No. It's that Bill Clinton led the reform to harm poor people RainDog Jun 2014 #17
sorry, I lived through and raised my family during the Clinton years bigtree Jun 2014 #22
it's not nonsense RainDog Jun 2014 #25
reality bigtree Jun 2014 #34
reality: that was the dot com boom RainDog Jun 2014 #45
The eitc increase and the child tax credit and the subtantial hike in the minumum wage Vattel Jun 2014 #58
four words bigtree Jun 2014 #59
Okay. I stand corrected. RainDog Jun 2014 #60
I think that was the decade we lost the textile industry in this country. nt eilen Jun 2014 #346
Here's a tidbit of facts that might make you pull your blinders off truedelphi Jun 2014 #32
you mean after he left office? what a joke bigtree Jun 2014 #40
Plus...all expenses paid to and from speeches, and for staffers needed, etc. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2014 #50
Ummm... that was after they were out of the White House. nt progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #73
Oh like asking people to get a job after being on welfare for a few years?? progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #70
Dependence is a cancer on society, they say. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #147
I have never experienced poverty RainDog Jun 2014 #153
If I remember correctly... ohheckyeah Jun 2014 #150
No, he didn't loan them the money, but he helped them get the loan. MADem Jun 2014 #176
It is just tone deaf, in the same way that the comments of many Republicans with money often are Ms. Toad Jun 2014 #231
+ 1,000 suffragette Jun 2014 #243
This........ Beacool Jun 2014 #274
This is all to counter the populism Le Taz Hot Jun 2014 #20
Yeah, because Bill Clinton was born wealthy. Beacool Jun 2014 #277
No, because Hillary Clinton was born poor. ieoeja Jun 2014 #315
Why "defend" it loyalsister Jun 2014 #21
While definitely a tone deaf statement, it is true. tritsofme Jun 2014 #23
If you had $10 but owed $11., you'd be dead broke wyldwolf Jun 2014 #24
uh, no. no, you wouldn't be dead broke in the sense that regular people struggle with it. cali Jun 2014 #30
uh, sure you would wyldwolf Jun 2014 #38
I love breaking this to you, but then I am not a hypocrite or a fabulist: cali Jun 2014 #42
You're living in the past wyldwolf Jun 2014 #49
you do know that little saying about those who don't learn from history, right? cali Jun 2014 #110
His post at number 55 was hidden SIXTEEN MINUTES before you posted this--he cannot reply to you. MADem Jun 2014 #127
There is nothing wrong with responding to someone who gets locked out of a thread morningfog Jun 2014 #223
It depends on what you SAY. MADem Jun 2014 #230
So alert and let the jury decide. morningfog Jun 2014 #248
It seems to me that everyone in this thread is saying what they please. Demit Jun 2014 #146
Bullshit, indeed. Some perhaps need to experience 'dead broke' to understand Purveyor Jun 2014 #39
Good point customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #139
It's hilarious(ly sad) the lengths people will go to attack the Clintons. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #86
Sorry, not a statement of fact customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #148
Yes, it is a statement of fact. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #168
The Clintons had more than just fancy educations customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #174
Of course this thread would have existed. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #180
Nice job of swinging to the opposite extreme customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #183
Hear, hear!!! Beacool Jun 2014 #284
Remember the outrage... uberblonde Jun 2014 #381
Good point. Beacool Jun 2014 #382
My point being... uberblonde Jun 2014 #383
Well, that we knew already. Beacool Jun 2014 #387
They were not looking to break our hearts. hrmjustin Jun 2014 #26
They were saddled with legal expenses. However, it didn't take long to replenish with speaking fees. RBInMaine Jun 2014 #27
No. And it is an issue. It's a top of the fold issue. cali Jun 2014 #33
The phrase is "above the fold." Demit Jun 2014 #149
By mentioning her supposed poverty customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #160
Yes, what she said about being broke was in response betsuni Jun 2014 #213
Her comments have been completely taken out of context by those looking for anything to bash her Metric System Jun 2014 #214
Yes--Republicans and allies have spun this masterfully lolly Jun 2014 #326
You are Trump and Clinton broke? HangOnKids Jun 2014 #217
Never had money and lost it or been in debt and I am not Trump or Clinton, so no betsuni Jun 2014 #239
More pile on of Clinton. It does not matter what she says Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #28
Coming from a staunch John Edwards fan like Cali, her OP is hysterical wyldwolf Jun 2014 #31
are you kidding? stop making shit up. I was the MOST anti- JE person on DU cali Jun 2014 #37
Bad news for you: wyldwolf Jun 2014 #47
you are a piece of work. cali Jun 2014 #48
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #55
that x100000 ^ nt progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #76
That x 10000000000000000 that the post got hidden HangOnKids Jun 2014 #124
Interesting that you liked that post that much. Scuba Jun 2014 #142
Gotta back cali up there BeyondGeography Jun 2014 #229
Well, poor Hillary has some experience ducking snipers...oh, wait. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #56
Wow.. taken directly from the FR talking point? classy. nt progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #79
No, taken directly from Hillary's lying mouth. n/t Whisp Jun 2014 #123
Hillary's own words frylock Jun 2014 #181
It was HRC's fictional construction - not a FR talking point.... xocet Jun 2014 #352
I sometimes wonder what site I've wandered onto... progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #75
some of us here are actually progressive dems who don't like war mongerers. Hillary is one. cali Jun 2014 #117
How is she a war monger? Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #159
More recently, according to her, truebluegreen Jun 2014 #238
Snarky Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #246
How many times did the White House have to disavowal itself from her statements at State? ieoeja Jun 2014 #320
Thanks for the info. I didn't know that about Special Envoy. Whisp Jun 2014 #324
What info? Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #384
I like being snarky. That said, the subject was Clinton. truebluegreen Jun 2014 #356
No. It was about Clinton being a hawk and Obama disagreeing Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #385
No. The discussion was about whether or not Clinton is a warmonger. truebluegreen Jun 2014 #398
Elitism is elitism Puzzledtraveller Jun 2014 #290
I ask myself that question every day. Beacool Jun 2014 #286
Yes, except in this case, she put her own foot in her own mouth. hughee99 Jun 2014 #252
They were millions in debt due to legal bills treestar Jun 2014 #35
It was avoidable customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #162
It could also have been avoided if Republicans had not tried to use it treestar Jun 2014 #184
You have to expect customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #190
Ken Starr spent tens of millions going after them. joshcryer Jun 2014 #355
The special prosecutor had investigated the Clintons for several years Beacool Jun 2014 #289
I'd sure like to see a breakdown customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #409
It's said that more money was spent on Clinton's year long lie Whisp Jun 2014 #413
Sometimes I miss the unrec button. liberalmuse Jun 2014 #36
You all have pretty much covered it, smile. oldandhappy Jun 2014 #43
More Clinton disingenuous bullshit tularetom Jun 2014 #44
Yes, and I'm guessing there was not a single person in that team of bullwinkle428 Jun 2014 #61
That does not negate the fact that they were millions in debt Evergreen Emerald Jun 2014 #92
But it does negate the "it was hard" part. Maedhros Jun 2014 #309
The Koch boys are already making film on how 'dead broke' she and Bill Purveyor Jun 2014 #46
"Will speak at Goldman Sachs for food..and $200,000". Sad story. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #52
Well, at least your cynical remark got me to chuckle. truedelphi Jun 2014 #154
LOL! nt laundry_queen Jun 2014 #206
For those who still care about actual facts.... uberblonde Jun 2014 #53
that has nothing to do with the tone deaf element cali Jun 2014 #63
Here's a fact. If I were to grant that she was indeed broke because of cost of legal representation Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #158
Sadly, there are too few of those in this pile. MADem Jun 2014 #237
I don't know if I see this OP as "claws out" or even something that would not be allowed karynnj Jun 2014 #276
Perception.... MADem Jun 2014 #292
If the article is correct, the Clintons NOT being reimbursed was part of the deal that there karynnj Jun 2014 #306
It was just an $8 million advance. Motown_Johnny Jun 2014 #54
She's doomed now. JoePhilly Jun 2014 #57
Good lord! Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #62
as I said: tone deaf. cali Jun 2014 #66
it's practically like skipping a couple meals waiting for the next welfare check to arrive.. frylock Jun 2014 #311
Ah thanks for reminding me why I left DU around the elections... progressivebydesign Jun 2014 #69
We don't hate Hillary customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #167
Yes, they DO hate the Clintons. Beacool Jun 2014 #283
Oh fer fuck sakes. You try and compare the Clintons to.... madinmaryland Jun 2014 #71
what??? where do I compare them to the Romneys? I DO NOT. cali Jun 2014 #83
BUT YOU SHOULD BE. What you posted is just not really relevant. madinmaryland Jun 2014 #89
That's what I was thinking betsuni Jun 2014 #179
"Tone deaf" doesn't begin to describe Hillary. When you have the Presidential pension .... Scuba Jun 2014 #74
I have no problem with the OP or the discussion of it Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #77
When I'm flat broke, I stop answering my phone and I stop opening mail because I have nothing Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #80
Holy Crap - I didn't get the memo! It's now time to start discrediting Hillary? Yes, I guess it's AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2014 #81
... and 'borrowing' right wing talking points to do it with. wyldwolf Jun 2014 #82
weak sauce, wolf. you call all criticism of Hillary or Obama "right wing". transparent and cali Jun 2014 #87
the OP, post 56, post 45 - ALL right wing knocks wyldwolf Jun 2014 #90
Well, of course the reich wing is going to seize on it customerserviceguy Jun 2014 #170
your sticking up for Hillary doesn't match your screenname m-lekktor Jun 2014 #251
Yeah, you're right. Who do you think I should support? Rand? Jeb? Romney? Cruz? GEEEEZZZ... AnotherMother4Peace Jun 2014 #361
Oh, boy ... It's going to be a long two years. 1000words Jun 2014 #85
+1 QuestForSense Jun 2014 #144
. boston bean Jun 2014 #88
Broke and no opportunities. Oh, wait. Broke and all the opportunities in the world. nt valerief Jun 2014 #93
This. That's why it's so incredibly tone deaf. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #95
The Clintons never had to worry about where their next meal was coming from. "Broke." HA !!! blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #118
An $8 million book advance plus her husband's and montly pension (plus expenses) dflprincess Jun 2014 #96
The book money went to charity. And they didn't own any real estate pnwmom Jun 2014 #109
Guess it's time to downsize. I'm guessing a 3 bedroom ranch in the burbs on a 1/4 acre would serve Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #113
Her NY home IS in the burbs. Do you have any idea what homes like that cost in Hillary's district? pnwmom Jun 2014 #120
No, I'm not terribly concerned. I'm positive the burbs have affordable homes for firefighters and Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #130
If they were "in debt" why would they give the book money to charity? tularetom Jun 2014 #135
Almost all Senators have homes in their local districts because they have to pnwmom Jun 2014 #138
Generally people who are "dead broke" dflprincess Jun 2014 #397
Can you spell distraction? blue neen Jun 2014 #97
She's sounding like Romney. Geez. Maybe we need a Democratic challenger. Kablooie Jun 2014 #98
It is entirely conceivable to me that with four years of Stanford (@ around $200K) pnwmom Jun 2014 #99
Entitled. blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #125
So, when they made a six figure salary for 8 years, they had NO house payment? joeglow3 Jun 2014 #267
A big chunk of that salary went to taxes -- this was before the Bush tax cuts. pnwmom Jun 2014 #268
As a Tax CPA, I can assure you there taxes were not that high joeglow3 Jun 2014 #282
As a person who pays taxes, and can Google, I can assure you pnwmom Jun 2014 #288
Oh, so since they CHOSE to send their daughter to an expensive school joeglow3 Jun 2014 #310
Do you realize that they've set up a charitable foundation? pnwmom Jun 2014 #329
Are you going to praise them as much as we do every other charitable foundation here joeglow3 Jun 2014 #331
Bill Clinton spent most of his career making $35K a year as the governor of a small state. pnwmom Jun 2014 #333
how about perks? I bet a President gets some of those... Whisp Jun 2014 #337
Most people are making 35k today AND pay for a house with utilities joeglow3 Jun 2014 #354
Zero living expenses? Wrong. He had all the regular living expenses except housing pnwmom Jun 2014 #374
Because they are hypocrites. Beacool Jun 2014 #291
Well, she doesn't have a very good record for veracity tularetom Jun 2014 #102
I can't seem to confabulate dodging sniper fire... Whisp Jun 2014 #319
Dead broke, but, never mind, they had friends with benefits. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #106
Her political acumen is greatly overstated. She has never won a seriously contested race and is TheKentuckian Jun 2014 #393
Agree. JDPriestly Jun 2014 #399
An out-of-touch 1%'er, to the core. blkmusclmachine Jun 2014 #108
yes. precisely. but isn't the outrage of her devotees interesting? cali Jun 2014 #112
Yes. bvar22 Jun 2014 #280
+1 leftstreet Jun 2014 #143
Complete with a complaint about how some of the money went to taxes loyalsister Jun 2014 #220
She has very much been against a tax increase. See; Hillary v Obama debate and the subject of how Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #233
that WAS dumb DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #235
+10000 woo me with science Jun 2014 #227
Yep, it must've been tough Hillary ... CountAllVotes Jun 2014 #114
Well you can hardly expect her to live as we JoeyT Jun 2014 #121
Compared to all her friends, that is dead broke LittleBlue Jun 2014 #128
There's a difference between being broke and being poor. TeamPooka Jun 2014 #134
Not to the ears of poor Americans who have little frame of reference to make that distinction. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #141
The ones that support the policies of the rich because they think they are or will be someday? TeamPooka Jun 2014 #145
You're describing republicans. She won't be courting their votes. I'm talking about people like my Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #152
Your argument assumes she is worried about courting Democratic Party voters. She is already TeamPooka Jun 2014 #347
Yes loyalsister Jun 2014 #332
That does not explain away why she has recently taken money from Sachs Whisp Jun 2014 #151
Are you capable of separating facts from your opinion? uberblonde Jun 2014 #156
No. Missing meals would have been the practical manifestation of broke. Making a sacrifice Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #173
Broke does not equal poor. Gidney N Cloyd Jun 2014 #157
I think Hillary should do us all a favor and forget about running for President. lumpy Jun 2014 #161
When you're a part of a royal couple that went to great lengths to truedelphi Jun 2014 #171
This. ^ AzDar Jun 2014 #196
I must reluctantly agree. navarth Jun 2014 #321
Bullshit! The Clintons didn't stab the middle class in the back AllTooEasy Jun 2014 #376
DURING the eight years of Clinton's reign, it is true that truedelphi Jun 2014 #412
Bullshit again! 2008's crisis was Clinton's fault AllTooEasy Jun 2014 #415
Please read up on the economic collapse. truedelphi Jun 2014 #416
I agree that the Banking Reform and Modernization Act was awful, but... AllTooEasy Jun 2014 #417
Gore did not even have the guts to fight for the vote count in Florida. truedelphi Jun 2014 #418
I disagree AllTooEasy Jul 2014 #419
just flat busted ell oh ell frylock Jun 2014 #165
You are only as broke as the resources you DON'T have. They had a lot of resources. YOHABLO Jun 2014 #166
Her timing is impeccable. joshcryer Jun 2014 #172
No, she has just given the GOP a present that will be opened again and again. djean111 Jun 2014 #189
The GOP can't run against making money. joshcryer Jun 2014 #191
The GOP will run against the hypocrisy. The GOP is quite offended when any Democrat djean111 Jun 2014 #194
They can't afford to. joshcryer Jun 2014 #195
You are using logic. They will not. djean111 Jun 2014 #200
The only thing the Democrat has to worry about is the left. joshcryer Jun 2014 #205
Ah. I see that the Left is already being set up as a whipping boy in some quarters. djean111 Jun 2014 #244
Newt on crossfire today sure did run with it. joshcryer Jun 2014 #369
I don't really think conflating not liking Hillary with being all newtie-minded is gonna work djean111 Jun 2014 #370
Breitbart is running with it. joshcryer Jun 2014 #371
Grayson is not being shoved down our throats as if the primaries were a foregone conclusion. djean111 Jun 2014 #388
Not from dems using right wing talking points. joshcryer Jun 2014 #389
What, exactly, is right wing about saying Hillary was tone deaf with the "broke" thing? djean111 Jun 2014 #390
You agree with Newt's view. joshcryer Jun 2014 #391
Wow. That is really a reach. And a spin. Good luck with that. djean111 Jun 2014 #403
It came about from her book. joshcryer Jun 2014 #404
Don't need your permission to bookmark, my dear. Condescension does not accomplish anything good, djean111 Jun 2014 #406
No, I appreciate the timing. joshcryer Jun 2014 #407
I pity those without political foresight. joshcryer Jun 2014 #408
Uh, why raise it at all? Union Scribe Jun 2014 #202
Raise it early, raise it often. joshcryer Jun 2014 #204
This is The Onion, yes? MannyGoldstein Jun 2014 #185
could be, but it's not. cali Jun 2014 #211
i remember MFM008 Jun 2014 #193
I seriously wonder what this place would have looked like.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2014 #208
I don't think you could be more off the mark if you tried. cali Jun 2014 #212
Yes. You know, I'm generally not ever going to leave here to be critical of Mrs. Clinton. Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #218
Very true, and very very well stated. Thank you. djean111 Jun 2014 #245
Thank you. I often get lost in the critique and fail to make the argument as to why Ed Suspicious Jun 2014 #249
Yes, I've already seen several comments about Bill keeping his pants zipped. Beacool Jun 2014 #299
Yeah I agree davidpdx Jun 2014 #216
Yeah, pretty tone deaf. NCTraveler Jun 2014 #224
Well, at least she did not say they were "homeless" for the hour it took to move out of the WH. CBGLuthier Jun 2014 #226
Broke for the rich is different than broke for the rest of us liberal N proud Jun 2014 #228
don't worry DonCoquixote Jun 2014 #236
I imagine people who are subsistence farmers in the sub-Sahara feel the same way about you and I... LanternWaste Jun 2014 #240
Calli...As a person living in poverty DearAbby Jun 2014 #241
I think Hillary could throw a naked baby onto a frozen lake and she would have defenders snooper2 Jun 2014 #242
I think Hillary could find the cure for cancer and she would have detractors. Beacool Jun 2014 #297
Maybe they were broke but were they ever in danger of being homeless? CrispyQ Jun 2014 #247
Gasp! The horror! raouldukelives Jun 2014 #250
That's my kind of broke, baby! Iggo Jun 2014 #253
Tone deaf is absolutely correct, but it likely was technically accurate - if only briefly karynnj Jun 2014 #254
“Let me just clarify that I fully appreciate how hard life is for so many Americans today,” PoliticAverse Jun 2014 #255
keep working really hard, all ya slackers out there. Whisp Jun 2014 #260
The lady doth clarify too much and too often. Whisp Jun 2014 #314
Only someone with incredible earnings power could go as broke as HRC dirtydickcheney Jun 2014 #256
From your link: Whisp Jun 2014 #264
I would call ~$10 million in debt "dead broke" MohRokTah Jun 2014 #257
Remember that time............ fredamae Jun 2014 #258
What do you call a $12M debt? Beacool Jun 2014 #261
you miss the point. entirely. she gaffed. the press is having a field day and so are the repubs cali Jun 2014 #263
She doesn't need your help. Beacool Jun 2014 #265
but Hillary Does need help. Whisp Jun 2014 #271
You have zero clue about Hillary. Beacool Jun 2014 #272
Oh yes I do. Hillary leaves clues around all over. Whisp Jun 2014 #273
Yes, she does. Iggo Jun 2014 #285
No, she doesn't need the help of a few disgruntled people on the internet Beacool Jun 2014 #294
Yes, she does. Iggo Jun 2014 #301
"She doesn't need you." Sort of sums up their thinking, doesn't it? n/t ieoeja Jun 2014 #325
So many on DU seem distraught that DURHAM D Jun 2014 #281
Yep, they seem to have preferred the alternative. Beacool Jun 2014 #295
Thank you, DURHAM D Duval Jun 2014 #342
She will probably admit some time in the future, Doctor_J Jun 2014 #278
Hillary Clinton is not only tone-deaf; she's also a serial offender RufusTFirefly Jun 2014 #279
Bill's lovers are trash, but Bill is still cool: Whisp Jun 2014 #287
Well, she was just stating facts. Beacool Jun 2014 #296
How about the disastrous furlough of Willie Horton? Wasn't that also a fact? RufusTFirefly Jun 2014 #302
LOL DURHAM D Jun 2014 #304
And in 2008 when talking about raising the cap for payroll taxes, she appeared to claim that JDPriestly Jun 2014 #307
It's like hearing someone say they know the plight of the homeless because they're in escrow. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2014 #312
or because they are at the mall and not at home... Whisp Jun 2014 #313
I'm divided on this because I do think Hillary is out of touch. But spreading Republican talking DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #323
I really admire Hillary Clinton, I really do Harry Monroe Jun 2014 #328
Let's break this down azureblue Jun 2014 #330
Can we just say the Clinton's weren't flush? Tommy2Tone Jun 2014 #335
I do not support her. There are far better people out there. Genuine liberals. EEO Jun 2014 #348
This kind of reminds of this women I know eilen Jun 2014 #349
oh, no, cali....now you're on the Clinton frenemy list!!!! nt antigop Jun 2014 #357
Dead Broke? strange7 Jun 2014 #359
Hilarity's Thespian2 Jun 2014 #360
This rec's for you Capt. Obvious Jun 2014 #364
She should have some tea and cookies with Ann ...they can both complain about "you people"... L0oniX Jun 2014 #365
Poor financial planning is her explanation? DeSwiss Jun 2014 #368
very interesting point. wonder if the RW talking heads will pick it up maggiesfarmer Jun 2014 #380
HILLARY should have thought of that. NOT OUR JOB to spin and twist whatever she says so it djean111 Jun 2014 #405
While Bill was Gov.;Hill was named partner @ law firm; made more $$$ than he did Divernan Jun 2014 #372
"We were broke" = "I'm trying to find a way to connect with the common citizen" nt NorthCarolina Jun 2014 #373
Broke? Like searching under sofa cushions for loose change 4 kids' milk money? Divernan Jun 2014 #377
Well probably not THAT kind of broke exactly. NorthCarolina Jun 2014 #410
Oh noes, a woman made some money in politics MyNameGoesHere Jun 2014 #378
that's what you took away from this? Sad. And guess what, I'm a feminist and that's the sole cali Jun 2014 #392
Hillary is no feminist, she Uses Feminism when it suits her. n/t Whisp Jun 2014 #396
No feminist I know would stay with a serial philanderer. Divernan Jun 2014 #400
tangent: "tone deaf" is the wrong phrase maggiesfarmer Jun 2014 #379
Hillary has NEVER been dead broke Amaya Jun 2014 #386
Amen, sister! Divernan Jun 2014 #401
Ex-presidents get retirement pay of about $200,000 per year currently Crabby Appleton Jun 2014 #411
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can you spell tone deaf? ...»Reply #282