Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's Getting Close Folks... Greenwald, Naming Names.... [View all]WillyT
(72,631 posts)43. So... I Guess The Pulitzer Award Has Been Reduced To Zero...
Funny... how some journalists attack their own institutions.
The Nobel is coming up in a couple of months...
Stay tuned...
And just when did you lose your respect for the 4th Amendment, and start holding up the works of Jon Yoo, David Addington, James Clapper, and Dick Cheney?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
261 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

How can you "learn" with your fingers in your ears and your eyes shut? You seem to want so
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#36
That's a bunch of crap and you know it. The NSA/CIA grabbed unbelievable power during the Bush
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#47
"Anyone who says this was all known during the Bush years is spinning wildly."
greiner3
Jun 2014
#222
Nice! The "old news" defense with a "because we have a black president" finish.
hughee99
Jun 2014
#155
36 post before someone played you are not a liberal if you dont bow down to GG/Snowden card
itsrobert
Jun 2014
#235
Post #34 was self hidden, did Cali_Democrat really say to "bow down before GG/Snowden?"
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#245
I really was just curious because I had never seen such a thing and wanted to see for myself
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#248
What we "learned" in the Bush years was vague. Now we have the documents to clarify
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#223
... not weird, glad Obama started the conversation months before SnowGlens releases
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#150
Some people see everything through a prism of how it will effect people in office.
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#23
You mean only those of us who are informed, know a little history and care about our
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#231
But How Does One Get To The Truth When Eveything Is Classified ???- This One Always Bothered Me...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#78
And what legitimate reason is there for collecting mass data on Americans' communications
mindwalker_i
Jun 2014
#134
And Maybe, THAT Is The Biggest Scandal Of All... What Was Once Unthinkable, Has Quietly Been...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#111
...only to conservatives who think everything started under Bush makes Obama look bad no? tia
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#149
It's the same reaction you might expect if you told a 6 year old there is no Santa Claus.
GoneFishin
Jun 2014
#136
or someone who sees SnowGlen for what they are and doesn't like what the Spy agencies are doing?
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#144
Greenwald never said he has info that would bring the US to its knees. Unbelievable that you put it
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#169
Cali, you do realize that you're making a conditional statement, don't you?...
truth2power
Jun 2014
#142
What do we know about the author of he comic artist? Who does he/she vote for?
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#247
If You Don't Want To Get Hurt... Do Not Engage In The Game... Or At The Very Least... End The Game..
WillyT
Jun 2014
#15
How Many Years Have We Been On This Board Together... And THAT Is What You Got ???
WillyT
Jun 2014
#21
To some it's about Obama. To others, like you and me, it's about un-Constitutional spying by
neverforget
Jun 2014
#26
I Know That... But Every Now And Then... Their Anger Reveals The Truth... And It Is Sad...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#30
Um... Presidents Are Afforded Two Terms... He's Been Elected Twice... Math Says You Are Wrong...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#31
???? just how did you get that? I am reading this thread and I am also familiar
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#35
A Toon That I Found On The WaPo Editorial Page, And Did Not Bother To Investigate... Nice Smear...
WillyT
Jun 2014
#49
Posted All Sorts Of Toons And Graphics Here... Did Not Know If This One Was RW Or Not... Didn't Care
WillyT
Jun 2014
#57
the editorial page is political opinions which include conservatives like George Will
JI7
Jun 2014
#56
Oh, I remember that and that had more to do with not knowing the right wing was behind it
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#51
I would think he/she would ignore you over me as I don't recall that we have engaged much
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#68
He/She doesn't ignore you because you post a lot and he/she wants to smear you.
LuvNewcastle
Jun 2014
#80
Well, it was kinda' bizarre, the poster was calling out Willy as a right winger trying to bring down
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#96
I guess not, all your time is for right wing policies on DU as long as the delusional
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#205
Oh... so the political aware isn't aware and that's excuse enough to post RW attacks on Obama? ok...
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#151
The "I'm done with you" retort is so common here... it's about the 16th time I've seen this in weeks
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#187
Yes, that these Snowden\GW reflexive defenses aren't very well thought through? regards
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#195
There is nothing religious or demagogic about Greenwald or Snowden's message.
Uncle Joe
Jun 2014
#146
Why don't you tell me what your name is and I'll shoot Greenwald an email.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#185
What people should take away is - THIS is the way you report this magnitude of information...
MrMickeysMom
Jun 2014
#55
NSA profiles domestic US enemy groups. One of them is below, scrambled for security purposes.
blkmusclmachine
Jun 2014
#110
Greenwald is right to play this out slowly. The Abu Ghraib revelations were gone in one news cycle.
RufusTFirefly
Jun 2014
#114
Interesting that he is going to use a different channel to publish this material.
NCTraveler
Jun 2014
#121
I don't understand either, and why would he be writing for the New York Times?
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#178
He hasn't shared one byline with the Times. I don't see why he'd start now.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#180
I think it is time to consider whether the confusion is genuine or feigned for some purpose
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#183
Not a Greenwald fan and especially after seeing him ON Bill Mahrer. He comes across as
mfcorey1
Jun 2014
#124
I am more interested in the information he will release in the forthcoming article
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#132
When did you post something to expose crimes of the national security state, zappaman?
Octafish
Jun 2014
#208
No, not a thing. Just trying to inject some levity into the oh-so-serious brigade.
randome
Jun 2014
#224
wait... we're supposed to just believe Snowden (a damn liar) without proof...............AGAIN?! tia
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#141
No, we are supposed to examine leaked documents and that's about it, they actually do exist. /nt
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#170
This isn't about leaked docs and they're not posting any docs with names of spied on US
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#171
I'm not going to take Snowdens word for it doesn't make sense to you?!!? REALLY?! That's interesting
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#188
There wont be any "leaked documents" in this context there will be "stories". I've already quoted
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#193
From the OP... Snowden wont be giving "documents" he'll be giving "stories" quote inside
uponit7771
Jun 2014
#190
Snowden doesn't have any documents to give and Greenwald has posted supporting documents with
Luminous Animal
Jun 2014
#201
a lot of the craziness we took as reactive was really preemptive I suspect
carolinayellowdog
Jun 2014
#218