Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dickthegrouch

(4,086 posts)
8. I appreciate the concern
Fri Aug 22, 2014, 03:29 PM
Aug 2014

Perhaps the rules could be written to require that the cameras are only required to be turned on when there is no supervisor present. Or perhaps defense attorneys could be given password-protected disabling mechanisms, and if there's no attorney present, the recording is automatic.

As usual, not corruption- or fool-proof, but a possible way to structure the protections.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Video cameras worn by eve...»Reply #8