discussionist is a misogynist pit hole - vulgar language

[Go Vols]

185. Results

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Sun Aug 31, 2014, 10:55 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Dismissive???
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5471754

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This person sees women on DU have been threatened with rape, and her response is to attack those same women. She makes a series of baseless allegations for which she consistently refuses to provide proof. That she does so in defense of a site where a man has just threatened three DUers by name with rape is OTT. What kind of person thinks this way? How can this be considered acceptable behavior?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Aug 31, 2014, 11:00 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The alert should have been a response post, not an alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh, please. An alert on a troll GD thread about what someone said on something called "discussionist?" And, after almost 200 inane replies that keep the inane thread going, in GD no less, this ONE post is deemed somehow "disruptive" of the "decorum" of the thread? Oh my! Where are my pearls for I must clutch them!!11!!
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: There is nothing in the post itself that merits being censored - which would throw the person out of the thread and prevent any dialog.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Preach it

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.