Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Robert Parry: Who’s Telling the ‘Big Lie’ on Ukraine? [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)67. Ridiculous.
        So by your logic, if US forces at Guantanamo moved into and annexed parts of Cuba, that wouldn't constitute an invasion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							187 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        Regarding your first paragraph...we sure do have a 'gaggle' of those around here.
        Purveyor
        Sep 2014
        #1
      
        
        Well, that doesn't refute anything in the article. What is he wrong about?  He's not the only one
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #33
      
        
        We are talking about his excellent work throughout the BUSH years, which airc, were just a few years
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #34
      
        
        Great, so if I see a Waaahhhhhhhh in the Ukraine article I'll know where it came from.
        NuclearDem
        Sep 2014
        #30
      
        
        Why is the Kiev government killing its own people?  The world is appalled at the carnage being
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #35
      
        
        I assume because the modern concept of a "good journalist" utterly precludes him
        reddread
        Sep 2014
        #21
      
        
        I assume you are being rhetorical.  There were a lot of "good journalists" when they were critical
        rhett o rick
        Sep 2014
        #24
      
        
        What should have knocked some sense of reality into their heads was Biden fracking Ukraine.
        Octafish
        Sep 2014
        #61
      
        
        "What should have knocked some sense of reality into their heads", you are looking at it
        rhett o rick
        Sep 2014
        #68
      
        
        Like Robert Parry, Don Fulsom is a top journalist covering crimes of the State.
        Octafish
        Sep 2014
        #70
      
        
        He got it right on Bush/Cheney too. He has made enemies for his reporting on that criminal
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #36
      
        
        Depending how you mean that, it's a good assessment. The neocons are the Putinistas
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #44
      
        
        Yes an unprovoked war of aggression. That term has a specific meaning in terms of international law
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #48
      
        
        We didn't engage in one in the Ukraine situation. You are justifying GWb's invasion of Iraq if
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #50
      
        
        No dancing. You are apologizing for an unprovoked war of aggression, just like in Iraq. nt
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #54
      
        
        Nope, you are engaging in apologia for an unprovoked war of aggression. Simple as that. nt
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #76
      
        
        Nope, you are engaging in fear mongering and jingoism. Easy peasy, works like a charm.
        JEB
        Sep 2014
        #87
      
        
        This is why you lose credibility on this subject. No one invaded Crimea. It is an insult to the
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #38
      
        
        That is a link to part of the Western MSM which is hardly a reliable source. Russia always had
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #60
      
        
        There's that condescension again. I am saying one thing, the Western Media is not reliable any more
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #82
      
        
        No media is totally reliable, and especially after they have been caught lying over and over again.
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #69
      
        
        Clearly you have no idea as to the events of the mob riots in Odessa...
        Tommy_Carcetti
        Sep 2014
        #118
      
        
        Exactly, thank you, at least YOU know why they didn't invade Crimea. Was that comment intended
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #59
      
        
        LMFAO! EU is to blame for Russia's war of aggression BC they proposed an association with Ukraine!
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #32
      
        
        Yeah, they said that about him when he was writing about the Cheney/Bush criminal administration
        sabrina 1
        Sep 2014
        #39
      
        
        Your entire post is debunked by the Russians themselves admitting their troops are there.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #81
      
        
        Reading is fundamental. Ten soldiers were CAPTURED. Surely you understand the difference, right? nt
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #114
      
        
        LMAO, the lies and sad justifications from Putin and his apologists are pathetic and
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #127
      
        
        I don't post fiction. I have citations that prove the facts underlying my positions. nt
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #77
      
        
        If one accepts all that at face value, it does not justify an unprovoked war of aggression by Russia
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #84
      
        
        After reading Parry's piece again, I'm even more astonished how idiotic it is.
        Tommy_Carcetti
        Sep 2014
        #63
      
        
        You show me the evidence as to how the US actually executed the forcible removal of Yanukovych....
        Tommy_Carcetti
        Sep 2014
        #79
      
        
        The irony is, even if the US completely put the uprising up to it, it does not justify Russia's
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #85
      
        
        If word out of the mouths of US State Department officials won't do it, perhaps you need new media.
        Octafish
        Sep 2014
        #90
      
        
        Someone in the State Department confessed to forcibly removing Yanukovych from power?
        Tommy_Carcetti
        Sep 2014
        #92
      
        
        You mean like the Iraq war that every DUer disagreed with including zappaman? nt
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #117
      
        
        Check out Octafish's responses throughout the thread from #107 down. Its deliberate.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #139
      
        
        You are accusing some DUers of being in favor of the Iraq war? You need proof otherwise?
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #129
      
        
        You accused Zappaman of not being against anything the BFEE does. Iraq was one of those things.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #132
      
        
        Your post #107 is only a few above this. Its not like its from another OP.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #134
      
        
        You suggested Zappaman didnt object to anything about the BFEE. Which he did and obviously so.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #138
      
        
        We both object to what the BFEE did with Iraq. As I have already told you and was proven.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #142
      
        
        Its in post #123 above. Once again, how many times do we have to post something before it sinks in
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #146
      
        
        All I've ever seen is references to a phone call. One that happened weeks before Yanukovych left.
        Tommy_Carcetti
        Sep 2014
        #111
      
        
        When we source something, you ignore it and claim several posts later it wasnt sourced.
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #144
      
        
        Really? Like... does a source become invalid if more than one person cites it?
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #151
      
        
        What provides plausible deniability? The video of Yanukovych packing up and leaving?
        Tommy_Carcetti
        Sep 2014
        #165
      
        
        The CIA’S Mop-Up Man: LA Times Reporter Cleared Stories with Agency before Publication
        Octafish
        Sep 2014
        #179
      
        
        And that shows you exactly what's going on here. An unprovoked war of aggression by Russia they
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #115
      
        
        Nothing about the US will justify an unprovoked war of aggression by Russia against Ukraine. nt
        stevenleser
        Sep 2014
        #171