discussionist is a misogynist pit hole - vulgar language

[Violet_Crumble]

391. Seeing you didn't answer anything you were asked, it wasn't that great of a try...

So I'll ignore the white noise and try it again. You joined DU long after the stuff Iverglas is talking about in her post. It appears you've taken it all as solid gold truth, but I was here when it all went down, and I know there's stuff in there she said that's true and other stuff that isn't. That's not to say she's lying. I know she believes every word she says. While I agree with her on most other issues, the way she dismisses feminists who don't adhere to her rigid view of feminism as not being feminists is a stance I find incredibly divisive and wrong.

I'll ask again. What did you find so compelling in her post? All of it? Maybe not the bits where she dismissed some really good DU feminists as not really being feminists? See, the thing is me and many other DUers read what was posted at that duckies board, and there was transphobia there. The timing of the very belated password protecting of it and that post was interesting, and that's all I was pointing out when you swooped on me...

I'm not on any side, btw. But I'd still like to know what 'side' you think I was, or am on. I doubt I'll get any sort of civil response, let alone an answer to the question, but I figure it's always worth a try....

p.s. there's one bit of white noise that stuck out as being totally off. What's with the 'little delio' crap? That reeks of not knowing what the hell happened, and not caring one iota what actually did happen. Not a good look on yr part....