General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is all out bombing worth it? [View all]TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)We were fighting a distinct enemy for distinct goals, and the country was on a total war economy for the effort.
We didn't have much of a stomach to enter that war until Pearl Harbor, but you'll note that even after 9/11 we don't have a draft or a fully supported effort to go in there and take over the ME. We did go in and topple Saddam, who had nothing to do with 9/11, and we farted around in Afghanistan without really changing anything.
A lot of death, destruction, and broken lives but no Marshall Plan. War is always confusing and shit happens, but the incompetence and corruption in our response to 9/11 is staggering. All that horror over there and nothing, NOTHING, has been accomplished when you get right down to it.
Obama has done a little to help straighten it all out, but I can't imagine anyone doing enough.
So, al-Qaeda started this mess, but we compounded it immeasurably and now have the choice to fully invade and take it all over, which is not a choice, or just walk away.
One is impossible, and the other is immoral.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):