Japan's timid coverage of Fukushima led this news anchor to revolt — and he's not alone (PRI)

[RobertEarl]

22. Lets see ..

Quoting hunter: "...than the accident at Fukushima. It's a big expensive mess to clean up, but far worse things have happened."

That equates to me as you saying Fukushima is not really a problem to the degree that most knowledgeable people consider it to be.

And you totally ignored the question of how to clean up the Pacific.

The question is not one of cost, it is a matter of is it even possible to clean the Pacific.

I guess, like you say, you are one of those who would : "...rather deal with the problems we can solve rather than the problems we seem powerless against."

The foci for me is for prevention of another nuke plant blowing its guts into our environment. The only way to do that is to close them all down safely. And do it now. So we are in opposition. You play down nuclear accidents without any scientific support, while I use science to make the case we can not afford one more nuke calamity. We certainly never could afford Fukushima.

If, hunter, you have some science backing your position, you should post it up. Otherwise, it seems you are just being emotional with your support for nukes.