Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Journalist Risen: 'Mercenary Class' Now Permanent Fixture in National Security State [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)68. ''War is a Racket.''
After World War I, Maj. Gen. Smedley Darlington Butler, USMC (ret.) even wrote an excellent book about it:
Chapter 2 EXCERPT...
The shipbuilders felt they should come in on some of it, too. They built a lot of ships that made a lot of profit. More than $3,000,000,000 worth. Some of the ships were all right. But $635,000,000 worth of them were made of wood and wouldn't float! The seams opened up -- and they sank. We paid for them, though. And somebody pocketed the profits.
It has been estimated by statisticians and economists and researchers that the war cost your Uncle Sam $52,000,000,000. Of this sum, $39,000,000,000 was expended in the actual war itself. This expenditure yielded $16,000,000,000 in profits. That is how the 21,000 billionaires and millionaires got that way. This $16,000,000,000 profits is not to be sneezed at. It is quite a tidy sum. And it went to a very few.
The Senate (Nye) committee probe of the munitions industry and its wartime profits, despite its sensational disclosures, hardly has scratched the surface.
Even so, it has had some effect. The State Department has been studying "for some time" methods of keeping out of war. The War Department suddenly decides it has a wonderful plan to spring. The Administration names a committee -- with the War and Navy Departments ably represented under the chairmanship of a Wall Street speculator -- to limit profits in war time. To what extent isn't suggested. Hmmm. Possibly the profits of 300 and 600 and 1,600 per cent of those who turned blood into gold in the World War would be limited to some smaller figure.
Apparently, however, the plan does not call for any limitation of losses -- that is, the losses of those who fight the war. As far as I have been able to ascertain there is nothing in the scheme to limit a soldier to the loss of but one eye, or one arm, or to limit his wounds to one or two or three. Or to limit the loss of life.
There is nothing in this scheme, apparently, that says not more than 12 per cent of a regiment shall be wounded in battle, or that not more than 7 per cent in a division shall be killed.
Of course, the committee cannot be bothered with such trifling matters.
SOURCE: http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html
To the warmonger, money and things are more precious than life and justice.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Journalist Risen: 'Mercenary Class' Now Permanent Fixture in National Security State [View all]
Octafish
Oct 2014
OP
T Roosevelt, Truman, and Eisenhower all tried to rid the country of the post-war war machine
librechik
Oct 2014
#25
And don't forget how former Booz Allen CEO is now the lying head of the NSA. Conflict of interest
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#58
Forgot to mention: Cheney spearheaded the privatization of Pentagon profits for BFEE
Octafish
Oct 2014
#76
It is truly sickening. It is obvious to anyone now that the wars they drag this country into
sabrina 1
Oct 2014
#82
They hate the new Iphone. We aren't supposed to have anything that can keep them from searching us.
L0oniX
Oct 2014
#39
Remember when Blackwater threatened to kill State Department inspector in Iraq? RISEN told us...
Octafish
Oct 2014
#15
The prolongation of the mercenary class/top secret everything is deeply troubling to me.
democrank
Oct 2014
#20
this is actually the point where we need POTUS to fulfill the promise of transparency
nashville_brook
Oct 2014
#40
I think you missed the point here. It appears that Pres Obama doesn't have the power
rhett o rick
Oct 2014
#51
True and before a single shot is fired, somebody's got to pay. Just don't ask for an accounting...
Octafish
Oct 2014
#87
The fact that they can keep files locked for 50 years says a lot about how little we are allowed to
liberal_at_heart
Oct 2014
#27
Which would explain why Gov. Don Siegelman's in prison and George W Bush is not.
Octafish
Oct 2014
#50
In general, the Founding Fathers did not even want us to have a standing army,
JDPriestly
Oct 2014
#32
"a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design"
johnnyreb
Oct 2014
#42
With US-led air strikes on ISIS intensifying, it’s a good time to be an arms giant
Octafish
Oct 2014
#77
''Money trumps peace.'' -- appointed pretzeldent George Walker Bush, Feb. 14, 2007
Octafish
Oct 2014
#69
War is here to stay. Too much PROFIT to be had. And, yeah, we'll all be starving penniless in the
blkmusclmachine
Oct 2014
#61
Yet the Democratic Party resists any attempt to bring these toxic agencies under control. eom
whereisjustice
Oct 2014
#65
"But some have seen this national security crisis as a financial opportunity, Risen said."
suffragette
Oct 2014
#84