Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,061 posts)

8. Which I don't find an inherent problem

Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:30 AM

Dec 2014

Just the way they're implemented. Allow a bit of due process and a GJ would be an awesome first line of defense, so to speak.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the grand jury system itself the problem? [View all] closeupready Dec 2014 OP

Blame the prosecutor(s) for the failure(s). n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #1

But they almost ALWAYS get a GJ indictment when closeupready Dec 2014 #2

It is the prosecutors. sir pball Dec 2014 #7

^^^ THIS! herding cats Dec 2014 #11

It absolutely is the prosecutors. joshcryer Dec 2014 #9

Cross examination is impossible. Igel Dec 2014 #15

Can't they at least make note of the contradictions? joshcryer Dec 2014 #16

Fifth Amendment morningfog Dec 2014 #3

That only applies to Federal charges, states get their own say sir pball Dec 2014 #4

All true. morningfog Dec 2014 #5

Which I don't find an inherent problem sir pball Dec 2014 #8

Corrupt prosecutors and ignorant peers. nt Ykcutnek Dec 2014 #6

In the Brown case the prosecutors should be sent to jail. nt kelliekat44 Dec 2014 #10

The USA is the only common law country that still uses grand juries. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #13

Prosecutors move up to District Attorney, Mayor, and even state/fed office. displacedtexan Dec 2014 #14

Just a clever, nifty , little tool that police departments can use SoCalDem Dec 2014 #17