Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Igel

(37,099 posts)

15. Cross examination is impossible.

Reply to joshcryer (Reply #9)

Thu Dec 4, 2014, 08:01 AM

Dec 2014

It's when one lawyer questions a witness called by his opponent.

There's only one lawyer in the GJ. He can't cross examine a witness he called to the stand.

Pretty much every contradiction and inconsistency in every bit of testimony was ignored. We mostly notice just those that suit us and overlook those that we don't like. (Which is why in a real trial there would be a cross. In the GJ, the contradictions in testimony are allowed to stand.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the grand jury system itself the problem? [View all] closeupready Dec 2014 OP

Blame the prosecutor(s) for the failure(s). n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #1

But they almost ALWAYS get a GJ indictment when closeupready Dec 2014 #2

It is the prosecutors. sir pball Dec 2014 #7

^^^ THIS! herding cats Dec 2014 #11

It absolutely is the prosecutors. joshcryer Dec 2014 #9

Cross examination is impossible. Igel Dec 2014 #15

Can't they at least make note of the contradictions? joshcryer Dec 2014 #16

Fifth Amendment morningfog Dec 2014 #3

That only applies to Federal charges, states get their own say sir pball Dec 2014 #4

All true. morningfog Dec 2014 #5

Which I don't find an inherent problem sir pball Dec 2014 #8

Corrupt prosecutors and ignorant peers. nt Ykcutnek Dec 2014 #6

In the Brown case the prosecutors should be sent to jail. nt kelliekat44 Dec 2014 #10

The system itself is the problem. Officers ramos and cicinelli got a real jury trial... 951-Riverside Dec 2014 #12

The USA is the only common law country that still uses grand juries. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #13

Prosecutors move up to District Attorney, Mayor, and even state/fed office. displacedtexan Dec 2014 #14

Just a clever, nifty , little tool that police departments can use SoCalDem Dec 2014 #17

The problem is that the prosecutors responsible for prosecuting police crimes NuclearDem Dec 2014 #18