Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: This image... [View all]

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. Peter Dale Scott has studied the question and put it into context...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:46 PM
Dec 2014
How the Doomsday Project Led to Warrantless Surveillance and Detention after 9/11

Nov 13, 2014 by Peter Dale Scott

EXCERPT...

Since World War II, secrecy has been used to accumulate new covert bureaucratic powers under the guise of emergency planning for disasters, planning known inside and outside the government as the “Doomsday Project.”

Known officially (and misleadingly) as “Continuity of Government” (COG) planning, the Doomsday Project, under the guiding hands in the 1980s of Oliver North, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and others, on 9/11 became the vehicle for a significant change of government. The extreme repressive powers accumulated under the guise of the Doomsday Project were first developed to control the rest of the world. Now, to an unprecedented extent, America itself is being treated as an occupied territory.

In 1994, Tim Weiner reported in The New York Times that “The Doomsday Project” had “less than six months to live.” (1) Weiner’s language was technically justifiable, but also very misleading. In fact COG planning now simply continued with a new target: terrorism. On the basis of Weiner’s article, the first two books to discuss COG planning, by James Bamford and James Mann, both reported that COG planning had been abandoned. (2)

What Weiner and these authors did not report was that in the final months of Reagan’s presidency the purpose of COG planning had officially changed: it was no longer for arrangements “after a nuclear war,” but for any “national security emergency.” This was defined in Executive Order 12656 of 1988 as: “any occurrence, including natural disaster, military attack, technological emergency, or other emergency, that seriously degrades or seriously threatens the national security of the United States.” (3)

In this way a totally legitimate program dating back to Eisenhower, of planning extraordinary emergency measures for an America devastated in a nuclear attack, was now converted to confer equivalent secret powers on the White House for anything it considered an emergency.

Cheney and Rumsfeld in from the Start

From its beginning in 1982, two of the key planners on the secret COG planning committee were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the same two men who implemented COG on 9/11. (4) The committee had been established by Reagan under a secret executive order, NSDD 55 of September 14, 1982. Despite what Weiner implied, the committee continued to meet without interruption until the George W. Bush presidency in 2001. (5)

An expanded application of COG was apparently envisaged as early as 1984, when, according to Boston Globe reporter Ross Gelbspan,

Lt. Col. Oliver North was working with officials of the Federal Emergency Management Agency… to draw up a secret contingency plan to surveil political dissenters and to arrange for the detention of hundreds of thousands of un-documented aliens in case of an unspecified national emergency. The plan, part of which was codenamed Rex 84, called for the suspension of the Constitution under a number of scenarios, including a U.S. invasion of Nicaragua. (6)


1In other words, extreme measures, designed originally to deal with an externally directed and devastating nuclear attack, were being secretly modified to deal whenever desired with domestic dissenters: a situation that still pertains to today. (7)

CONTINUED...

http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/11/13/doomsday-project-led-warrantless-surveillance-detention-911/

Anyone got Lexis/Nexis might want to call up:

William Neikirk, "Bush to be exempt from House's hostage probe," Chicago Tribune 8/8/1991.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This image... [View all] ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 OP
The first photo caption... Octafish Dec 2014 #1
The Kingpin (shaking Wallace's hand) is still in control, eh? Either way he wins. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #2
Around that time, Poppy fixed it so he was Secret Government Big Shot Octafish Dec 2014 #9
That is such a bad photoshop ffr Dec 2014 #13
No Photoshop. Photo from Dirck Halstead. Octafish Dec 2014 #32
That's what their faces looked like. Actually I think it makes them look better than sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #61
So.... ReRe Dec 2014 #19
Looks like Darth picked up where Poppy left off. dmr Dec 2014 #31
Peter Dale Scott has studied the question and put it into context... Octafish Dec 2014 #33
Was this an invite to all Governors or just selected ones? hrmjustin Dec 2014 #24
Don't know. Michael Beschloss, my mom's favorite historian, says it's genuine. Octafish Dec 2014 #34
The picture of future Royality in Wellstone ruled Dec 2014 #3
... but they will settle for Hillary. bvar22 Dec 2014 #14
Exactly FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #17
correctomundo They_Live Dec 2014 #43
+1000000 liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #4
Wish I could kick and rec this a thousand times. hifiguy Dec 2014 #5
Couldn't agree more. It should be played everywhere. nt Doremus Dec 2014 #15
Yep, yep, and yep. zeemike Dec 2014 #6
I'd vote for George Carlin if he were alive. JEB Dec 2014 #7
it's a big club handmade34 Dec 2014 #8
That was Carlin at his best... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2014 #10
Long shot, but help fight for Publicly Funded Elections, Bernie Sanders #1 issue! Dustlawyer Dec 2014 #11
Those people in the photo reversed the progress of the New Deal. Octafish Dec 2014 #35
Thank you. Here's Clinton and Paul Ryan colluding on Medicare cuts: woo me with science Dec 2014 #71
excellent Carlin clip! nt m-lekktor Dec 2014 #12
*whimper* Arugula Latte Dec 2014 #16
What was the event of the top picture? hrmjustin Dec 2014 #18
See Post #1 (nt) bigwillq Dec 2014 #22
Yikes! Read post #1!! elias49 Dec 2014 #23
I miss him more each year...and I do NOT mean Bill Clinton Moostache Dec 2014 #20
Just say NO....to Hillary and Jeb (nt) bigwillq Dec 2014 #21
Seems they may as well be on the same ticket. Actually why aren't there just 2 Parties both appalachiablue Dec 2014 #69
And these photos ffr Dec 2014 #25
Great photos and thanks for the reminder that these are GOOD people. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #27
Aaaaaaand... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #29
That speaks volumes, doesn't it? n/t MissDeeds Dec 2014 #37
It really does. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #39
+1 woo me with science Dec 2014 #70
And look who's hiding in the Bushes. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #38
!!! Odin2005 Dec 2014 #42
That pic makes me sad. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #41
Body Language Octafish Dec 2014 #45
Exaclty, my eight-sided fishy friend! nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #46
Romanesque Occasion Octafish Dec 2014 #48
That is reading way too much into that treestar Dec 2014 #60
K&R ReRe Dec 2014 #26
Carlin Rant is a Classic, photo of Bill needs more context to mean something. Martin Eden Dec 2014 #28
"...does not mean Bill endorses what they represent..." This is true. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #30
Well, Barbara Bush has said that Bill Clinton is 'like a son to me' and recently sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #62
Bill's a Big Time Schmoozer Martin Eden Dec 2014 #63
Well, while he was schmoozing with the Bushes, many of us were fighting with Bush supporters sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #64
I'm not a fan of Bill Clinton Martin Eden Dec 2014 #65
Bush supporters were all over the internet after Bush was elected, they were obsessed sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #68
I defended Clinton when he was president Martin Eden Dec 2014 #72
Its a big club indeed... 951-Riverside Dec 2014 #36
To be fair, George Wallace was a changed man after he was shot. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #40
AMEN. woo me with science Dec 2014 #44
exclusive club heaven05 Dec 2014 #47
What is the point of this? treestar Dec 2014 #49
Awwwww.... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #50
Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #53
Worst hide this month in response to your post. Number23 Dec 2014 #66
I'm with George..... DeSwiss Dec 2014 #51
No Clinton. No Bush. No More. Kip Humphrey Dec 2014 #52
Is Bill Clinton photoshopped into that? JDPriestly Dec 2014 #54
apparently not photoshopped. see Nos. 1 & 32. appalachiablue Dec 2014 #55
I must live beyond reason then because I do not reasonably expect to see that happening in 15/16. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2014 #56
Sitting at a table together is proof of . . . ? nt geek tragedy Dec 2014 #57
That they've sat down together since 5 years before either one was president. Octafish Dec 2014 #58
Nothing but it is being posted all over DU now. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #67
Just like how Ted Kennedy was in cahoots with Reagan and Bush NYC Liberal Dec 2014 #59
Who said anything about "cahoots"? We're talking about an exclusive club of elites. Poor, poor ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This image...»Reply #33