Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This image... [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)33. Peter Dale Scott has studied the question and put it into context...
How the Doomsday Project Led to Warrantless Surveillance and Detention after 9/11
Nov 13, 2014 by Peter Dale Scott
EXCERPT...
Since World War II, secrecy has been used to accumulate new covert bureaucratic powers under the guise of emergency planning for disasters, planning known inside and outside the government as the Doomsday Project.
Known officially (and misleadingly) as Continuity of Government (COG) planning, the Doomsday Project, under the guiding hands in the 1980s of Oliver North, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and others, on 9/11 became the vehicle for a significant change of government. The extreme repressive powers accumulated under the guise of the Doomsday Project were first developed to control the rest of the world. Now, to an unprecedented extent, America itself is being treated as an occupied territory.
In 1994, Tim Weiner reported in The New York Times that The Doomsday Project had less than six months to live. (1) Weiners language was technically justifiable, but also very misleading. In fact COG planning now simply continued with a new target: terrorism. On the basis of Weiners article, the first two books to discuss COG planning, by James Bamford and James Mann, both reported that COG planning had been abandoned. (2)
What Weiner and these authors did not report was that in the final months of Reagans presidency the purpose of COG planning had officially changed: it was no longer for arrangements after a nuclear war, but for any national security emergency. This was defined in Executive Order 12656 of 1988 as: any occurrence, including natural disaster, military attack, technological emergency, or other emergency, that seriously degrades or seriously threatens the national security of the United States. (3)
In this way a totally legitimate program dating back to Eisenhower, of planning extraordinary emergency measures for an America devastated in a nuclear attack, was now converted to confer equivalent secret powers on the White House for anything it considered an emergency.
Cheney and Rumsfeld in from the Start
From its beginning in 1982, two of the key planners on the secret COG planning committee were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the same two men who implemented COG on 9/11. (4) The committee had been established by Reagan under a secret executive order, NSDD 55 of September 14, 1982. Despite what Weiner implied, the committee continued to meet without interruption until the George W. Bush presidency in 2001. (5)
An expanded application of COG was apparently envisaged as early as 1984, when, according to Boston Globe reporter Ross Gelbspan,
1In other words, extreme measures, designed originally to deal with an externally directed and devastating nuclear attack, were being secretly modified to deal whenever desired with domestic dissenters: a situation that still pertains to today. (7)
CONTINUED...
http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/11/13/doomsday-project-led-warrantless-surveillance-detention-911/
Anyone got Lexis/Nexis might want to call up:
William Neikirk, "Bush to be exempt from House's hostage probe," Chicago Tribune 8/8/1991.
Nov 13, 2014 by Peter Dale Scott
EXCERPT...
Since World War II, secrecy has been used to accumulate new covert bureaucratic powers under the guise of emergency planning for disasters, planning known inside and outside the government as the Doomsday Project.
Known officially (and misleadingly) as Continuity of Government (COG) planning, the Doomsday Project, under the guiding hands in the 1980s of Oliver North, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and others, on 9/11 became the vehicle for a significant change of government. The extreme repressive powers accumulated under the guise of the Doomsday Project were first developed to control the rest of the world. Now, to an unprecedented extent, America itself is being treated as an occupied territory.
In 1994, Tim Weiner reported in The New York Times that The Doomsday Project had less than six months to live. (1) Weiners language was technically justifiable, but also very misleading. In fact COG planning now simply continued with a new target: terrorism. On the basis of Weiners article, the first two books to discuss COG planning, by James Bamford and James Mann, both reported that COG planning had been abandoned. (2)
What Weiner and these authors did not report was that in the final months of Reagans presidency the purpose of COG planning had officially changed: it was no longer for arrangements after a nuclear war, but for any national security emergency. This was defined in Executive Order 12656 of 1988 as: any occurrence, including natural disaster, military attack, technological emergency, or other emergency, that seriously degrades or seriously threatens the national security of the United States. (3)
In this way a totally legitimate program dating back to Eisenhower, of planning extraordinary emergency measures for an America devastated in a nuclear attack, was now converted to confer equivalent secret powers on the White House for anything it considered an emergency.
Cheney and Rumsfeld in from the Start
From its beginning in 1982, two of the key planners on the secret COG planning committee were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, the same two men who implemented COG on 9/11. (4) The committee had been established by Reagan under a secret executive order, NSDD 55 of September 14, 1982. Despite what Weiner implied, the committee continued to meet without interruption until the George W. Bush presidency in 2001. (5)
An expanded application of COG was apparently envisaged as early as 1984, when, according to Boston Globe reporter Ross Gelbspan,
Lt. Col. Oliver North was working with officials of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to draw up a secret contingency plan to surveil political dissenters and to arrange for the detention of hundreds of thousands of un-documented aliens in case of an unspecified national emergency. The plan, part of which was codenamed Rex 84, called for the suspension of the Constitution under a number of scenarios, including a U.S. invasion of Nicaragua. (6)
1In other words, extreme measures, designed originally to deal with an externally directed and devastating nuclear attack, were being secretly modified to deal whenever desired with domestic dissenters: a situation that still pertains to today. (7)
CONTINUED...
http://whowhatwhy.com/2014/11/13/doomsday-project-led-warrantless-surveillance-detention-911/
Anyone got Lexis/Nexis might want to call up:
William Neikirk, "Bush to be exempt from House's hostage probe," Chicago Tribune 8/8/1991.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The Kingpin (shaking Wallace's hand) is still in control, eh? Either way he wins. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#2
That's what their faces looked like. Actually I think it makes them look better than
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#61
Don't know. Michael Beschloss, my mom's favorite historian, says it's genuine.
Octafish
Dec 2014
#34
Long shot, but help fight for Publicly Funded Elections, Bernie Sanders #1 issue!
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#11
Thank you. Here's Clinton and Paul Ryan colluding on Medicare cuts:
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#71
Seems they may as well be on the same ticket. Actually why aren't there just 2 Parties both
appalachiablue
Dec 2014
#69
Carlin Rant is a Classic, photo of Bill needs more context to mean something.
Martin Eden
Dec 2014
#28
"...does not mean Bill endorses what they represent..." This is true. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#30
Well, Barbara Bush has said that Bill Clinton is 'like a son to me' and recently
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#62
Well, while he was schmoozing with the Bushes, many of us were fighting with Bush supporters
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#64
Bush supporters were all over the internet after Bush was elected, they were obsessed
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#68
I must live beyond reason then because I do not reasonably expect to see that happening in 15/16.
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2014
#56
Who said anything about "cahoots"? We're talking about an exclusive club of elites. Poor, poor
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#73