General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Corruption Is Now Officially Legal in the U.S., ''But Must Be Done Right'' [View all]Shrike47
(6,913 posts)I never practiced business law so I may be wrong. However, it seems to me that the person with insider knowledge gleaned without a payoff has no duty or obligation to anybody else, particularly strangers. It would be different if the person was your investment advisor.
If you are bleeding death on the sidewalk, I have no duty or obligation to help you, even if I could save your life.
Think about this: the person with insider information could be (unlikely, I know) your hairdresser to whom you give investment advice, or someone who overhears a phone call you make. In real life, it's probably rich people exchanging information but it doesn't have to be that way.
At any rate, I don't see how a person who benefits from insider info owes the uninformed anything.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):