General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Corruption Is Now Officially Legal in the U.S., ''But Must Be Done Right'' [View all]KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)investment 'loss' (or capital loss), haven't your profits come at the expense of my losses? Every winner must needs be paired with a loser and if your win comes as a result of insider information you have gleaned whether by paying for it or not, it seems to me you have an advantage you would not otherwise have gained, one that comes at my expense. Isn't that the classic defintiion of a 'tort'?
Again, IANAL so am using what I hope is a layperson's common sense in my approach, while recognizing that the law carves out special definitions and meanings of commonly understood terms.
Wasn't Martha Stewart prosecuted and convicted for exactly this type of 'insider trading'? IOW, IIRC, she didn't pay anything for the insider info she acted upon but her actions to get out of that stock ahead of the news allowed her to escape the losses that were inflicted upon the unwitting souls who purchased the stocks she unloaded.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):