General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Corruption Is Now Officially Legal in the U.S., ''But Must Be Done Right'' [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)always been against the law.
My take on this is that there HAS been a lot of insider trading going on and they are afraid of being caught.
So, they are buying laws to cover their crimes. I wonder if they made it retroactive like the FISA Bill Amendment where they passed a law that went back to cover the period when the Telecoms broke the law by spying on the American people? Must be nice, you're a crook, you break the law, then your buddies slap you on the back, say 'not to worry, we'll pass a new law to make what you did legal'.
As for Martha Stewart. She wasn't charged with or prosecuted for insider trading. That WAS the initial claim, but they could not prove it. And I don't believe she was.
I believe that was a political prosecution by a moronic, Republican prosecutor. She was a Democrat.
In the end they didn't want to let her off the hook once she was on it, so the dug out an obscure law, at the time, which states that if you lie to a Federal Officer it is a crime.
She apparently talked to Federal Agents, very naive of her, and during their talks she made some statements that were not accurate.
That is what she went to jail for, on a charge of lying to a Federal Agent. It was a bogus charge and a vindictive prosecution.
The media never corrected the false claim that she was convicted of Insider Trading.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):