Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
44. I agree with you. And as far as I know, it's called 'insider trading' and has
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 03:26 AM
Dec 2014

always been against the law.

My take on this is that there HAS been a lot of insider trading going on and they are afraid of being caught.

So, they are buying laws to cover their crimes. I wonder if they made it retroactive like the FISA Bill Amendment where they passed a law that went back to cover the period when the Telecoms broke the law by spying on the American people? Must be nice, you're a crook, you break the law, then your buddies slap you on the back, say 'not to worry, we'll pass a new law to make what you did legal'.

As for Martha Stewart. She wasn't charged with or prosecuted for insider trading. That WAS the initial claim, but they could not prove it. And I don't believe she was.

I believe that was a political prosecution by a moronic, Republican prosecutor. She was a Democrat.

In the end they didn't want to let her off the hook once she was on it, so the dug out an obscure law, at the time, which states that if you lie to a Federal Officer it is a crime.

She apparently talked to Federal Agents, very naive of her, and during their talks she made some statements that were not accurate.

That is what she went to jail for, on a charge of lying to a Federal Agent. It was a bogus charge and a vindictive prosecution.

The media never corrected the false claim that she was convicted of Insider Trading.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rogue corporatocracy ............. marmar Dec 2014 #1
Three GOP judges don't make a country club. Octafish Dec 2014 #33
That array of clowns must come from before 2005. tclambert Dec 2014 #38
In case you didn't notice... 99Forever Dec 2014 #2
What would Goldman think of that? Octafish Dec 2014 #27
Thanks for the link... 99Forever Dec 2014 #28
In a totally corrupted capitalist government fasttense Dec 2014 #3
Which is why I believe RoccoR5955 Dec 2014 #11
Yes, I've started to think this way, as well. When people lose out closeupready Dec 2014 #50
WTF? blackspade Dec 2014 #4
People in the know have been doing that all along, LuvNewcastle Dec 2014 #5
I'd like to get some attorneys' takes on this, as IANAL. It would seem that KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #6
I'm an attorney and I'd say no go. What duty does the person with inside info have to you? Shrike47 Dec 2014 #22
OK, but if your investment 'win' (or capital gain) comes at the expense of my KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #26
I agree with you. And as far as I know, it's called 'insider trading' and has sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #44
There are some mornings when I wake up to find egg on my face, and this is surely one. Thanks KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #47
She was being investigated for "insider" trading but that's not what got her prosecuted/sentenced.. 2banon Dec 2014 #45
As Sabrina1 points out immediately upthread, Stewart was a donor to Democrats. Her prosecution a KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #48
Thanks for the reminder on the specifics.. 2banon Dec 2014 #49
I lost all respect when she tried to blame her secretary, as I recall, closeupready Dec 2014 #51
like i said, I didn't have a high regard for her before that happened. 2banon Dec 2014 #53
Unmarked cash in an envelope is so old school. Autumn Dec 2014 #7
but still really really effective. (nt) ret5hd Dec 2014 #35
It's in our faces now... woo me with science Dec 2014 #8
Yes it is. As long as the media doesn't report on it, it isn't happening. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #17
Bribery has been legal for a while here in the US too. RoccoR5955 Dec 2014 #9
its the only way PowerToThePeople Dec 2014 #10
K&R. I didn't notice that insider trading is now legal. Overseas Dec 2014 #12
Makes that Martha Stewart jail stint libodem Dec 2014 #14
I immediately thought of her, too -- and her alleged $30K transaction. pnwmom Dec 2014 #21
Yep libodem Dec 2014 #37
Genuine Overload. 7wo7rees Dec 2014 #13
Unending flurries of blows from every direction seemingly daily. TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #29
Corruption is not only legal in the U.S., it's greatly admired by many citizens. nt ladjf Dec 2014 #15
K&R! This post deserves hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Dec 2014 #16
Bet they already had a clandestine futures market set up for this.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2014 #18
and the rich keep getting richer shanti Dec 2014 #19
I wonder if the movie, "Altar-Boys of Wall-Street", is out? Johnny Rash Dec 2014 #20
Right, like you are going to pay him directly zeemike Dec 2014 #23
My Daughter watoos Dec 2014 #24
The rot just keeps getting worse. At some point we will be forced to take drastic action. EEO Dec 2014 #25
Collectively, The American People Are Not Desperate Enough - Maybe Some Day cantbeserious Dec 2014 #31
The plutocracy never sleeps. Rex Dec 2014 #30
What a billionaire makes an hour. Octafish Dec 2014 #32
One hour in any one of their shoes and I'd be more than set for life. JEB Dec 2014 #39
K&R. Please post this as a separate thread and send me a private mail notifying me that you JDPriestly Dec 2014 #42
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #34
I take a different view: The law is the law, no matter what the courts say. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #36
K&R This is just beyond ridiculous. raouldukelives Dec 2014 #40
The stock market is a fixed game. The winners win by cheating in many cases. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #41
Which is why I keep scratching my head..... DeSwiss Dec 2014 #43
14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism blkmusclmachine Dec 2014 #46
kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corruption Is Now Officia...»Reply #44