General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just for fun: what VP would Warren need to have to run? [View all]SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I do try to keep in mind that my preferences in this area may well be totally unlike those of the average voter.
Another totally random anecdote is this: In 1988, a friend who was Republican -- and this is before the extreme polarization we have now -- was genuinely offended at the selection of Dan Quayle as the Republican VP candidate. She was insulted that women (like her) should be more likely to vote for George HW Bush because of Dan Quayle.
I feel very much the same way. If I like my party's nominee in the first place, the VP either doesn't matter (if that choice is either neutral or favorable for me) or still won't make me stay home or vote for the other guy -- if the VP nominee is someone I don't like.
I need to be honest here and address the elephant in the room: Hillary Clinton. I am one who is not at all crazy about her, to the point that I don't think she is a remotely good candidate as presidential nominee. If (the gods forbid) she does become our nominee, I'll be faced with a very tough choice: do I vote for her because she's my party's nominee? Or do I not, because I am so opposed to her and all she represents? And what if she selects a VP I really like, such as Elizabeth Warren?
I can't now answer those questions, but I will tell you I'll be very, very conflicted if that happens.
Oh, and I absolutely agree, that Obama was going to win in 2008, no matter what.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):