General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CIA admits to being responsible for at least half of UFO sightings in the 50s and 60s [View all]Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Don't try to claim a book you have never read does not have the research you are looking for. Sagan's book is very well sourced, there is extensive documentation to back up his views in it. If you read it you would know this, but instead you try to claim the book is merely his opinion despite the fact that it is very well researched and he cites numerous sources.
You still have not answered the challenge I gave you earlier however. If you think any of the authors of the non-scientific "study" you keep citing have more credibility than Sagan then tell us why.
Pick just one person from your list and tell me why their credentials are better than Sagan's. Tell me some information on them beyond their titles, tell me about the peer reviewed articles they have written, awards they have received, universities they have taught at. If you think any of them are more credible than Sagan then provide some biographical information to tell us why.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):