General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CIA admits to being responsible for at least half of UFO sightings in the 50s and 60s [View all]zappaman
(20,625 posts)They seem to have been explained in that wiki link.
More here though
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1997-06-26/news/the-great-ufo-cover-up/
and here...
To this day, programs like Dateline invariably question people who saw the earlier vee event, and quote them saying that flares couldnt possibly explain what they saw. They are right. They didnt see flares, they saw a formation of planes. Dateline repeatedly showed people talking about their memories of the 8:30 vee while showing video of the 10 pm flares. Talk about misleading.
There was at least one person who videotaped both the 8:30 vee and the later event. I saw his tape myself. It clearly showed the five lights of the 8:30 vee moving in relation to each other, exactly as youd expect in a formation of airplanes.
As for the people who swore they saw a black triangular shape joining the five lights of the vee, thats a classic contrast effect of the human eye. In a very telling case, a man who swore he saw a black shape joining the lights of the vee saw it pass directly in front of the moon. At that point, he saw not a black shape but wavy lines pass over the undimmed moon. But rather than conclude that hed seen the contrails of planes, the man, whose perception had already been heavily influenced by the UFO explanation concluded instead that the pilot of the alien craft had turned his spaceship transparent right at that moment so the man could see the moon through it. How convenient!
http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/08-05-21/
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):