Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
22. You are most welcome, Buenoscuche! I think he's my nephew, if not my brother. The other guy, too.
Fri Jan 2, 2015, 07:17 PM
Jan 2015

The TIME writer was at the Duquesne JFK conference I attended. Of all the people to interview there, including the sponsor's Dr. Cyril Wecht, he focused on the guy supporting the CIA version of the Kennedy assassination.



The Debunker Among the Buffs

Fifty years after John F. Kennedy's assassination, another wave of conspiracy theories has arrived. One little-known professor has spent his last 20 years fighting the skeptics.

By Jack Dickey
TIME, Nov. 05, 2013

EXCERPT...


“Tonight they can get us all in one drone strike,” Oliver Stone, who directed JFK, told a gathering of Kennedy assassination buffs one evening last month. “This is like going to a meeting of abolitionists in the 1850s. We know we’re all right. But our passion scares them.”

Everyone here at Duquesne University’s International Symposium on the 50th Anniversary of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy agreed that Kennedy had been murdered, brazenly, brutally. But the old men on the dais and in the audience, with their tweedy getups and rapidly spreading bald spots, could not concur on who had done it and how and why. Maybe Lee Harvey Oswald shot Kennedy. Maybe a second gunman had done it. Maybe he (or they) were acting on Castro’s orders, maybe on Hoover’s, maybe on Johnson’s. A lot of support coalesced around the CIA’s complicity. But who at the CIA would have had the President killed? And how?

Bobbing along like any other tern in this sea of skepticism and paranoia was John McAdams, a 68-year-old associate professor of political science at Marquette. McAdams looked like every anonymous student of the assassination: He, too, had tan pants, a briefcase, and silver hair atop a big head with prominent features. On the last day, before a full house, one speaker praised McAdams for having the guts to turn up. The speaker called for a sarcastic round of applause and then went on with his speech.

“That’s because I’m a debunker,” McAdams said afterward. “I debunk things. I’m in the business of knowing how so much of what is said here is nonsense.”

What an odd business that is for a 1964 graduate of Kennedy High School in Kennedy, Ala., who every so often finds himself attending conventions on Kennedy’s assassination. Though he’s no academic star, McAdams has secured his own kind of prominence by devoting much of his adult life to calling nonsense on the most persistent strain of doubt in U.S. history.

***

A few hundred of McAdams’s usual antagonists had traveled to Pittsburgh to hear the likes of Oliver Stone and Cyril Wecht assail the Warren Commission, the blue-ribbon panel Lyndon Johnson charged immediately after the assassination with uncovering the truth. In September 1964, the panel fingered Oswald as the gunman whose bullets, fired from a 6.5mm Carcano rifle perched on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository, had wounded Texas Gov. John Connally and killed Kennedy. No outsider had influenced him; he acted alone. Case closed, as one well-known book would put it later.

CONTINUED...

http://nation.time.com/2013/11/05/the-debunker-among-the-buffs/



From the audience, I heard the above answer a question from a panel that included Russ Baker, Jefferson Morley, Lisa Pease, Jerry Policoff and Oliver Stone, regarding media coverage of the JFK assassination. He hadn't a clue. He certainly hadn't heard disgraced CIA director Allen Dulles "failed" to inform his fellow Members of the Warren Commission of the matter concerning how the CIA had hired the Mafia to assassinate Fidel Castro in 1960.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

His criticisms of the TA were fair, respectful and legitimate bluestateguy Jan 2015 #1
The explanation I got was he made a personnel problem public HereSince1628 Jan 2015 #4
Apparently because he identified her by name he created a situation in which tblue37 Jan 2015 #11
If you say something in a class you are saying it in public AngryAmish Jan 2015 #13
She was speaking to the boy after class and he was secretly recording her tblue37 Jan 2015 #19
Here's what McAdams wrote... Octafish Jan 2015 #5
The article I read at the link said she told him he couldn't make homophobic comments in class Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #6
marquette is a catholic university, and we know the catholic party line on gays nt msongs Jan 2015 #2
He was fired for criticizing a TA admonishing mmonk Jan 2015 #3
I sort of think he was suspended for publically admonishing a subordinate. Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #8
Whoops. ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jan 2015 #21
More from McAdams and Marquette University... Octafish Jan 2015 #7
"He is willing to bend the facts to fit his narrative" zappaman Jan 2015 #10
Read Carefully. Octafish Jan 2015 #15
Here's the Story Reported by a Supporter of the Instructor: A-Schwarzenegger Jan 2015 #9
McAdams used on a colleague what he's employed against critics of the Warren Commission. Octafish Jan 2015 #12
I remember the smug asshole from the alt jfk groups A-Schwarzenegger Jan 2015 #18
John McAdams and the Siege of Chicago Octafish Jan 2015 #20
McAdams reminds me of a lot of a few posters here. Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #14
a FAQ Octafish Jan 2015 #16
I didn't want to date myself mentioning usenet. Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #17
You are most welcome, Buenoscuche! I think he's my nephew, if not my brother. The other guy, too. Octafish Jan 2015 #22
Masters of the Dark Arts Octafish Jan 2015 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marquette Suspends Profes...»Reply #22