Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mfcorey1

(11,007 posts)
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 07:02 AM Jan 2015

Why 3 Supreme Court Justices Didn’t Attend the State of the Union [View all]


President Obama Delivers State Of The Union Address At U.S. Capitol © Provided by Time Article President Obama Delivers State Of The Union Address At U.S. Capitol

The wording in the Constitution is simple and straightforward: the President “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union.” There's nothing in there about the Supreme Court justices and, accordingly, there's nothing simple and straightforward about their attendance.

This year, six justices were in attendance, while three of the most conservative members of the court, Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were noticeably absent. In the modern era, custom has held that the justices would show up in their official robes and sit impassively. But in recent years, they've become more resistant to the tradition.

Justice Antonin Scalia’s absence is no surprise. It was the 19th State of the Union in a row that he’s skipped since he considers the speech a “childish spectacle.”

Justice Clarence Thomas’s empty seat was also unsurprising. In 2012, Thomas said he doesn’t attend the annual event because “it has become so partisan and it's very uncomfortable for a judge to sit there.”

Thomas’s remark gets to the heart of why the State of the Union has become a painful event for the justices: the address has become a “political pep rally,” according to Chief Justice John Roberts (who still attends nonetheless), as the justices are forced to sit calmly while the President and members of government around them cheer and crow about the politics of the moment.

For years, attendance among the justices has been declining: From 1965 through 1980, the attendance rate was 84 percent. Over the next two decades, the number dropped to 53 percent. Since 2000, the rate has fallen to 32 percent, according to a study by Todd Peppers of Roanoke College and Michael Giles of Emory University.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/why-3-supreme-court-justices-didn%E2%80%99t-attend-the-state-of-the-union/ar-AA8pimD?ocid=mailsignout
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frankly Sherman A1 Jan 2015 #1
I vote for Ginsburg to stay away from the SOTU so she can be the Designated Survivor Justice! merrily Jan 2015 #3
Ginsburg apparently fell asleep at this SOTU. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #8
I am not understanding which point you are trying to make. merrily Jan 2015 #10
The point is if you want to pick a single justice to represent the Supreme Court at the SOTU, PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #19
Why not? Falling asleep at the SOTU does not affect performance of her duties as a Justice or merrily Jan 2015 #21
Oh I see, you are picking her to be the only justice not at the STOU PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #24
You are right. I better change my post merrily Jan 2015 #26
I did too and do so every year Sherman A1 Jan 2015 #11
She had a stent placed in a heart artery this last week. longship Jan 2015 #15
My bad. My original post about Ginsburg led PoliticAverse astray. merrily Jan 2015 #29
I hear Scalia takes a dump in that ridiculous hat he affects before he puts it on in the am. merrily Jan 2015 #2
(that would partly explain the malodorous emanations coming from him..... lastlib Jan 2015 #13
He's very smart so I can't honestly call him shit for brains. I did the next best thing merrily Jan 2015 #22
Based upon his opinion of the SOTU Speech, Thomas avebury Jan 2015 #4
Based on the American Bar Association's opinion of Thomas, probably Thomas should not be merrily Jan 2015 #12
And that was BEFORE he was seated ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #14
A SCOTUS with so little curiosity about the usually important cases being argued before him merrily Jan 2015 #23
Actually ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #30
Perhaps it is that we tend to engage only around our disagreements. merrily Jan 2015 #31
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #32
Key word being "only?" merrily Jan 2015 #33
Alito can't keep his mouth shut anyway caraher Jan 2015 #5
He becomes the story by skipping it anyway. And the story will always include merrily Jan 2015 #7
Probably attending right-wing fund raisers... KansDem Jan 2015 #6
One year, Scalia was a speaker at another event. He claimed he did not do it to upstage the SOTU. merrily Jan 2015 #9
It is a heavily political event, I'm okay if they all skip it. n/t tammywammy Jan 2015 #16
Same here. I couldn't care less if the SC justices are there are not. Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #17
They should skip it. There is no reason for them to be there. Vattel Jan 2015 #18
OK I can see that, if all skip it. Then, it does not become its own story that distracts from the merrily Jan 2015 #25
Holy crap! I can't believe I actually agree with Scalia, Thomas and Roberts about something! The_Commonist Jan 2015 #20
Was 'Real Housewives of New York' renewed? Octafish Jan 2015 #27
Clarence Thomas wrote the book on partisan politics. B Calm Jan 2015 #28
Sonia Sotomayor skipped last year's SOTU former9thward Jan 2015 #34
No surprise Scalia thinks it's a childish spectacle AndreaCG Jan 2015 #35
Uncle Ruckus complaining about partisanship? hifiguy Jan 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why 3 Supreme Court Justi...