Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why 3 Supreme Court Justices Didn’t Attend the State of the Union [View all]
President Obama Delivers State Of The Union Address At U.S. Capitol © Provided by Time Article President Obama Delivers State Of The Union Address At U.S. Capitol
The wording in the Constitution is simple and straightforward: the President shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union. There's nothing in there about the Supreme Court justices and, accordingly, there's nothing simple and straightforward about their attendance.
This year, six justices were in attendance, while three of the most conservative members of the court, Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito were noticeably absent. In the modern era, custom has held that the justices would show up in their official robes and sit impassively. But in recent years, they've become more resistant to the tradition.
Justice Antonin Scalias absence is no surprise. It was the 19th State of the Union in a row that hes skipped since he considers the speech a childish spectacle.
Justice Clarence Thomass empty seat was also unsurprising. In 2012, Thomas said he doesnt attend the annual event because it has become so partisan and it's very uncomfortable for a judge to sit there.
Thomass remark gets to the heart of why the State of the Union has become a painful event for the justices: the address has become a political pep rally, according to Chief Justice John Roberts (who still attends nonetheless), as the justices are forced to sit calmly while the President and members of government around them cheer and crow about the politics of the moment.
For years, attendance among the justices has been declining: From 1965 through 1980, the attendance rate was 84 percent. Over the next two decades, the number dropped to 53 percent. Since 2000, the rate has fallen to 32 percent, according to a study by Todd Peppers of Roanoke College and Michael Giles of Emory University.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/why-3-supreme-court-justices-didn%E2%80%99t-attend-the-state-of-the-union/ar-AA8pimD?ocid=mailsignout
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
36 replies, 4642 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I vote for Ginsburg to stay away from the SOTU so she can be the Designated Survivor Justice!
merrily
Jan 2015
#3
The point is if you want to pick a single justice to represent the Supreme Court at the SOTU,
PoliticAverse
Jan 2015
#19
Why not? Falling asleep at the SOTU does not affect performance of her duties as a Justice or
merrily
Jan 2015
#21
I hear Scalia takes a dump in that ridiculous hat he affects before he puts it on in the am.
merrily
Jan 2015
#2
He's very smart so I can't honestly call him shit for brains. I did the next best thing
merrily
Jan 2015
#22
Based on the American Bar Association's opinion of Thomas, probably Thomas should not be
merrily
Jan 2015
#12
A SCOTUS with so little curiosity about the usually important cases being argued before him
merrily
Jan 2015
#23
One year, Scalia was a speaker at another event. He claimed he did not do it to upstage the SOTU.
merrily
Jan 2015
#9
OK I can see that, if all skip it. Then, it does not become its own story that distracts from the
merrily
Jan 2015
#25
Holy crap! I can't believe I actually agree with Scalia, Thomas and Roberts about something!
The_Commonist
Jan 2015
#20