Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
19. The point is if you want to pick a single justice to represent the Supreme Court at the SOTU,
Wed Jan 21, 2015, 09:10 AM
Jan 2015

don't pick someone that has repeatedly fallen asleep at them...

"She has joked that in the past former Justice David Souter was the designated nudger."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/obamas-speech-didnt-excite-ginsburg/2013/02/13/b4531d8e-75fc-11e2-aa12-e6cf1d31106b_blog.html

Frankly Sherman A1 Jan 2015 #1
I vote for Ginsburg to stay away from the SOTU so she can be the Designated Survivor Justice! merrily Jan 2015 #3
Ginsburg apparently fell asleep at this SOTU. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #8
I am not understanding which point you are trying to make. merrily Jan 2015 #10
The point is if you want to pick a single justice to represent the Supreme Court at the SOTU, PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #19
Why not? Falling asleep at the SOTU does not affect performance of her duties as a Justice or merrily Jan 2015 #21
Oh I see, you are picking her to be the only justice not at the STOU PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #24
You are right. I better change my post merrily Jan 2015 #26
I did too and do so every year Sherman A1 Jan 2015 #11
She had a stent placed in a heart artery this last week. longship Jan 2015 #15
My bad. My original post about Ginsburg led PoliticAverse astray. merrily Jan 2015 #29
I hear Scalia takes a dump in that ridiculous hat he affects before he puts it on in the am. merrily Jan 2015 #2
(that would partly explain the malodorous emanations coming from him..... lastlib Jan 2015 #13
He's very smart so I can't honestly call him shit for brains. I did the next best thing merrily Jan 2015 #22
Based upon his opinion of the SOTU Speech, Thomas avebury Jan 2015 #4
Based on the American Bar Association's opinion of Thomas, probably Thomas should not be merrily Jan 2015 #12
And that was BEFORE he was seated ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #14
A SCOTUS with so little curiosity about the usually important cases being argued before him merrily Jan 2015 #23
Actually ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #30
Perhaps it is that we tend to engage only around our disagreements. merrily Jan 2015 #31
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #32
Key word being "only?" merrily Jan 2015 #33
Alito can't keep his mouth shut anyway caraher Jan 2015 #5
He becomes the story by skipping it anyway. And the story will always include merrily Jan 2015 #7
Probably attending right-wing fund raisers... KansDem Jan 2015 #6
One year, Scalia was a speaker at another event. He claimed he did not do it to upstage the SOTU. merrily Jan 2015 #9
It is a heavily political event, I'm okay if they all skip it. n/t tammywammy Jan 2015 #16
Same here. I couldn't care less if the SC justices are there are not. Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #17
They should skip it. There is no reason for them to be there. Vattel Jan 2015 #18
OK I can see that, if all skip it. Then, it does not become its own story that distracts from the merrily Jan 2015 #25
Holy crap! I can't believe I actually agree with Scalia, Thomas and Roberts about something! The_Commonist Jan 2015 #20
Was 'Real Housewives of New York' renewed? Octafish Jan 2015 #27
Clarence Thomas wrote the book on partisan politics. B Calm Jan 2015 #28
Sonia Sotomayor skipped last year's SOTU former9thward Jan 2015 #34
No surprise Scalia thinks it's a childish spectacle AndreaCG Jan 2015 #35
Uncle Ruckus complaining about partisanship? hifiguy Jan 2015 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why 3 Supreme Court Justi...»Reply #19