Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Renew Deal

(84,356 posts)
9. I don't think this is fully thought out.
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 10:50 PM
Jan 2015

The state has an interest in documenting who made a legal marriage contract, because that's what a marriage is. There would have to be a process to license wedding officiants. And limiting it to the religious only will not hold up in court. Also, there are many non-denominational type churches that would legally be able to marry anyone. So in the end it causes problems and accomplishes nothing. Now that I think about it, that sounds like the party platform.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proposed bill would end m...»Reply #9