Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'We Were Arrogant': New York Times editor Dean Baquet: We failed to do our job after 9/11 [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)2. Fuck you New York Times.
You weren't arrogant. You were willing.
Judith Miller was one of the coalition, along with Scooter Libby, a full fledged Aspen.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'We Were Arrogant': New York Times editor Dean Baquet: We failed to do our job after 9/11 [View all]
kpete
Jan 2015
OP
And Because Of This Our Current Politicians Who Don't Question Are Not Worth A Dime
billhicks76
Jan 2015
#51
They were fully fledged participants. Their mission was to convey misinformation
Enthusiast
Jan 2015
#65
"Not aggressive enough" is quite the understatement. You made Pravda look good. You still do.
merrily
Jan 2015
#3
I was thinking the same thing actually because the truth is they rolled over and
cstanleytech
Jan 2015
#36
You only have the blood of 1,000,000+ innocent Iraqis dripping from your
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#7
And nothing has changed as the NYT and others look away from Christian radicalism and denial
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#8
The MSM was complicit, not simply arrogant and not simply slow or human or anything else. nt
deminks
Jan 2015
#11
Two rules - Rule 1: Telling the truth is nothing compared to being able to keep their cushy jobs
leveymg
Jan 2015
#12
And the Times will hold off publishing it until *after* the next relevant election
KeepItReal
Jan 2015
#16
So funny. NYT is not being aggressive enough on several issues TODAY. *cough* TPP *cough*
stillwaiting
Jan 2015
#19
Why I no longer subscribe. Abject failure to be a newspaper. Just a mouthpiece for the PTB.
on point
Jan 2015
#21
Don't apologize to us, apologize to the 4000 plus families missing a son or daughter or mother
Rex
Jan 2015
#22
Yeah, thanks for this bullshit confession after nearly 5000 American deaths,
Downtown Hound
Jan 2015
#23
Finally. I'm still waiting for the LA Times to admit its fault in its sloppy reporting on the pre-
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#31
As another reply already said, it wasn't arrogance, but complicity. They knew what they were doing
dissentient
Jan 2015
#35
http://scontent-a.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xap1/t51.2885-15/10661278_690549904368166_1036940458_a.jp
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#44
That's behind us. Are you agressive enough to ask H. Clinton why she betrayed the country
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#46
She shares a heavy responsibility for the deaths of our troops and Iraqi people. She
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#72
the media was treacherous, corrupt, stupid, bullies, and many other things after 911
samsingh
Jan 2015
#68