Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'We Were Arrogant': New York Times editor Dean Baquet: We failed to do our job after 9/11 [View all]calimary
(84,575 posts)59. THIS^^^^
I doubt they've learned much of anything. The GOP message machine still leads them around by their lazy unquestioning gullible "give 'em the benefit of the doubt" noses.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'We Were Arrogant': New York Times editor Dean Baquet: We failed to do our job after 9/11 [View all]
kpete
Jan 2015
OP
And Because Of This Our Current Politicians Who Don't Question Are Not Worth A Dime
billhicks76
Jan 2015
#51
They were fully fledged participants. Their mission was to convey misinformation
Enthusiast
Jan 2015
#65
"Not aggressive enough" is quite the understatement. You made Pravda look good. You still do.
merrily
Jan 2015
#3
I was thinking the same thing actually because the truth is they rolled over and
cstanleytech
Jan 2015
#36
You only have the blood of 1,000,000+ innocent Iraqis dripping from your
KingCharlemagne
Jan 2015
#7
And nothing has changed as the NYT and others look away from Christian radicalism and denial
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#8
The MSM was complicit, not simply arrogant and not simply slow or human or anything else. nt
deminks
Jan 2015
#11
Two rules - Rule 1: Telling the truth is nothing compared to being able to keep their cushy jobs
leveymg
Jan 2015
#12
And the Times will hold off publishing it until *after* the next relevant election
KeepItReal
Jan 2015
#16
So funny. NYT is not being aggressive enough on several issues TODAY. *cough* TPP *cough*
stillwaiting
Jan 2015
#19
Why I no longer subscribe. Abject failure to be a newspaper. Just a mouthpiece for the PTB.
on point
Jan 2015
#21
Don't apologize to us, apologize to the 4000 plus families missing a son or daughter or mother
Rex
Jan 2015
#22
Yeah, thanks for this bullshit confession after nearly 5000 American deaths,
Downtown Hound
Jan 2015
#23
Finally. I'm still waiting for the LA Times to admit its fault in its sloppy reporting on the pre-
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#31
As another reply already said, it wasn't arrogance, but complicity. They knew what they were doing
dissentient
Jan 2015
#35
http://scontent-a.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xap1/t51.2885-15/10661278_690549904368166_1036940458_a.jp
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#44
That's behind us. Are you agressive enough to ask H. Clinton why she betrayed the country
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#46
She shares a heavy responsibility for the deaths of our troops and Iraqi people. She
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#72
the media was treacherous, corrupt, stupid, bullies, and many other things after 911
samsingh
Jan 2015
#68