Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Laser Focus 2-3-15 - ISIS, Some Fellow Liberals and War [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)3. Here is UN Security Council Resolution 2170. You can read it for yourself
http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sc11520.doc.htm
15 AUGUST 2014
SC/11520
Security Council Adopts Resolution 2170 (2014) Condemning Gross, Widespread Abuse of Human Rights by Extremist Groups in Iraq, Syria
Text Places Sanctions on Individuals Associated with those Organizations
Calling on all United Nations Member States to act to suppress the flow of foreign fighters, financing and other support to Islamist extremist groups in Iraq and Syria, the Security Council this afternoon put six persons affiliated to those groups on its terrorist sanctions list.
Through the unanimous adoption of resolution 2170 (2014), under the binding Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Council condemned in the strongest terms what it called gross, systematic and widespread abuse of human rights by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS) and Al-Nusra Front. In an annex to the text, it named the individuals subject to the travel restrictions, asset freezes and other measures targeted at Al-Qaida affiliates. [Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, leader of ISIL, was not among the six because he has been listed since 2011].
It called on Member States to take national measures to prevent fighters from travelling from their soil to join the groups, reiterating obligations under previous counter-terrorism resolutions to prevent the movement of terrorists, as well as their supply with arms or financial support. It expressed readiness to consider putting on the sanctions list those who facilitated the recruitment and travel of foreign fighters.
Through the resolution, the Council demanded that ISIL, Al-Nusra Front and all other entities associated with Al-Qaida cease all violence and terrorist acts, and immediately disarm and disband. Recalling that their attacks against civilians on the basis of ethnic or religious identity might constitute crimes against humanity, it stressed the need to bring those perpetrators, including foreign fighters, to justice.
The Council directed the sanctions monitoring team to report on the continuing threat posed by ISIL and the Front, and their sources of arms, funding, recruitment and demographics, and to present recommendations within 90 days to further address the threat.
.
.
.
(more at above link)
15 AUGUST 2014
SC/11520
Security Council Adopts Resolution 2170 (2014) Condemning Gross, Widespread Abuse of Human Rights by Extremist Groups in Iraq, Syria
Text Places Sanctions on Individuals Associated with those Organizations
Calling on all United Nations Member States to act to suppress the flow of foreign fighters, financing and other support to Islamist extremist groups in Iraq and Syria, the Security Council this afternoon put six persons affiliated to those groups on its terrorist sanctions list.
Through the unanimous adoption of resolution 2170 (2014), under the binding Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Council condemned in the strongest terms what it called gross, systematic and widespread abuse of human rights by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS) and Al-Nusra Front. In an annex to the text, it named the individuals subject to the travel restrictions, asset freezes and other measures targeted at Al-Qaida affiliates. [Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, leader of ISIL, was not among the six because he has been listed since 2011].
It called on Member States to take national measures to prevent fighters from travelling from their soil to join the groups, reiterating obligations under previous counter-terrorism resolutions to prevent the movement of terrorists, as well as their supply with arms or financial support. It expressed readiness to consider putting on the sanctions list those who facilitated the recruitment and travel of foreign fighters.
Through the resolution, the Council demanded that ISIL, Al-Nusra Front and all other entities associated with Al-Qaida cease all violence and terrorist acts, and immediately disarm and disband. Recalling that their attacks against civilians on the basis of ethnic or religious identity might constitute crimes against humanity, it stressed the need to bring those perpetrators, including foreign fighters, to justice.
The Council directed the sanctions monitoring team to report on the continuing threat posed by ISIL and the Front, and their sources of arms, funding, recruitment and demographics, and to present recommendations within 90 days to further address the threat.
.
.
.
(more at above link)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So if the US and UN have targeted funding for ISIS, why are these guys still sitting on thrones?
leveymg
Feb 2015
#2
There is a universal freeze on their assets. What do you think isn't being done? As the Syrian
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#7
There is broad agreement that "substantial" funds are still reaching ISIS from KSA and GCC states
leveymg
Feb 2015
#12
Do the numbers. Oil accounts for about 40%, that leaves a big hole in the Caliphate's budget
leveymg
Feb 2015
#15
Do what numbers? Do you have a number for ISIS's accountant? Do you have their Quicken account?
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#16
Believe it or not, they issue annual reports. Like any other foreign-held corporation.
leveymg
Feb 2015
#17
I did. My point stands. Provide their detailed sheet, not anecdotes in an article. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#20
You wrote ISIS is "making money from selling Syrian and ... Iraqi oil" and a "universal freeze" on
leveymg
Feb 2015
#34
Note in particular the comments by the Syrian who sits on the UN Sec Council...
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#4
Why are you asking question #5 about their funding if the Syrians explain here how they are making
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#8
The possibility of blowback always exists with violence at the micro or macro level. As I noted in
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#32
Yep, group A may have done something wrong, but we can't do anything because "US Bad"
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#13
Not exactly. ISIS is evil but wouldn't likely exist without our actions. Actions with similar
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#41
I hate, hate, hate, hate war. BUT in this case I think you are all right about what we and the world
jwirr
Feb 2015
#30
this is a classic argument in favor of preemptive war - a Bushian defense of military intervention
bigtree
Feb 2015
#35
You so wonderfully make my point. You make a superficial analysis to say "this is all the same"
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#36
LOL. Do you even get how ridiculous your position is? Arguing Iraq/Saddam 2003 is the same as ISIS
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#39
There is no point to which to reply. You are making a ridiculous posit. Good luck with it. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#43
Nothing new. I am for interventions where its justified and against those that aren't. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#56
It will be different time is said every time and almost never in living memory has it been.
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#53
And if each of us had to live on betting their respective positions you'd have to hock your organs
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#62
From Gilda Radner...."There's always somthin'". Indeed. But once you're committed to Empire, the
libdem4life
Feb 2015
#47
One quibble: ISIS is already getting their asses kicked on all fronts. So why change tactics? nt
ieoeja
Feb 2015
#49
While I have no sympathy for groups like ISIS whatsoever, I'm also not inclined to engage in
Marr
Feb 2015
#60
Steven has been on Fox News many times. Leser is listed as a "Fox News Insider"
leveymg
Feb 2015
#64
Yep, I was there for a debate on Healthcare reform and suddenly Palin resigned. And they needed
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#71
Nope, she resigned several years ago. I talk about things happening as they happen. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#97
LOL, that's not what that means. You get listed there for having a particularly hot debate.
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#70
On Election Night, 2012, Steve interviewed me on his radio show for my work on behalf of the Obama
msanthrope
Feb 2015
#107
Is that sort of like how the Washington Generals "play" the Harlem Globe Trotters?
leveymg
Feb 2015
#66
You mean like my desired candidate winning the Presidency the last two times?
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#73
You mean like the candidate who said he was a Liberal, then as president wasn't.
Octafish
Feb 2015
#103
I say exactly what I believe. And that happens to coincide with what most Liberals believe. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#72
You mean like my desired candidate winning the Presidency the last two times? nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#75
And my answer is the same. The majority of Liberals and I support the same candidates. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#79
Having been on his radio show, detailing my work as an voter protection attorney, I
msanthrope
Feb 2015
#108
I'm not going spend time going through your posts. I've seen enough to know you're wrong on most
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#80
Steve Leser was glad to have me on his show on Election Night, 2012, where I detailed
msanthrope
Feb 2015
#109
This creates big problems for those of you who want to continue honoring the Saudis and others
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2015
#87
The simple answer is that the Saudis are not engaging in wars of conquest where ISIS is.
stevenleser
Feb 2015
#98