Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
15. PCH is a dangerous road. There are hardly any intersections because of
Sat Feb 7, 2015, 08:40 PM
Feb 2015

Last edited Sat Feb 7, 2015, 11:46 PM - Edit history (1)

cliffs on one side and beach on the other side. That makes people tend to go too fast. If one person disrupts the flow of traffic accidents happen. I have seen many accidents and fatalities on that stretch of road all the way to Zuma Beach over the many years I lived in Santa Monica. Jenner should have waited until he reached one of the canyon roads where it would have been easy to ditch them.

It's no excuse. FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #1
Without knowing the circumstances how do you know? pnwmom Feb 2015 #2
Lots of things and other drivers can cause distractions FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #5
Easy for you to say. You must be a perfect driver, never distracted by anything. pnwmom Feb 2015 #6
This isn't about me, and that's a silly argument/tactic. FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #19
agreed FL CatWoman Feb 2015 #26
that's the thing that makes me most angry about this JI7 Feb 2015 #30
The only reason paparazzi are chasing him now is because of he's about to out himself as transgender pnwmom Feb 2015 #62
Not really, it's because he's a *famous* person who is transgender. cui bono Feb 2015 #70
And he's famous because he was an Olympic Medalist decades ago. pnwmom Feb 2015 #72
No. He's famous now because he was on a reality show with the Kardashians. cui bono Feb 2015 #74
They wouldn't be chasing him now if it weren't for the transgender story. pnwmom Feb 2015 #81
two words CatWoman Feb 2015 #84
this family has welcomes paparazzi for some years now , that's how they make a lot of money JI7 Feb 2015 #75
+10 840high Feb 2015 #78
Just like gun owners???? They are model citizens until they aren't. madinmaryland Feb 2015 #67
Everybody gets distracted at some point... RichGirl Feb 2015 #111
As others have said, he chose this life. Kaleva Feb 2015 #37
Actually, no. He didn't choose to be born a woman in a man's body. pnwmom Feb 2015 #65
He choose to be a reality tv and check out magazine celebrity. Kaleva Feb 2015 #77
EVERYBODY has things in their lives that they have no control over. RichGirl Feb 2015 #112
wanting to be famous when it suits you is no excuse. He wasn't in roguevalley Feb 2015 #3
How do you know he drove recklessly? I was hit from behind by someone pnwmom Feb 2015 #7
You don't think it's reckless to drive distracted by a cell phone? n/t Exhibit A Feb 2015 #8
I think that IS an example of driving recklessly. But I haven't heard evidence pnwmom Feb 2015 #10
Nonsense. Exhibit A Feb 2015 #14
Tell that to the widow of Milton Olin ga_girl Feb 2015 #23
I am invested in the idea of not judging people before the facts are in. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #33
we knwo there was an accident and someone died and jenner was in the car that hit the woman who died JI7 Feb 2015 #38
IF what Jenner said is true -- and I acknowledge we don't know you -- then I think pnwmom Feb 2015 #41
BS , there are bigger stars who get far more paparazzi after them and don't cause accidents like JI7 Feb 2015 #43
So what? It still shouldn't be legal, even if it is rare. It's too dangerous pnwmom Feb 2015 #48
what's dangerous is how Jenner was driving, that family makes a living with their relationship with JI7 Feb 2015 #49
What do you know about how he was driving? pnwmom Feb 2015 #96
Not sure I agree given his recent news elias7 Feb 2015 #54
When you hit somone in front of you, you are driving recklessly Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #31
He claims he was trying to avoid paparazzi kcr Feb 2015 #40
Dollars to doughnuts cwydro Feb 2015 #55
check out the pics before he hits the car, at least one looks like he is looking down at something JI7 Feb 2015 #59
I saw that too. cwydro Feb 2015 #60
You're right -- it only takes a second. Which is why it's wrong for paparazzi to shoot photos pnwmom Feb 2015 #61
Hey, I totally agree on the pap part of this story. cwydro Feb 2015 #64
It doesn't automatically excuse him -- but it makes them share some of the responsibility, in my opinion. pnwmom Feb 2015 #68
I'll agree with you there. cwydro Feb 2015 #69
I don't know what the circumstances are, so I don't know if he deserves any penalty. pnwmom Feb 2015 #71
Yeah, I'm just going on the premise cwydro Feb 2015 #73
Being distracted by a cell phone (while driving) and causing an accident is reckless. LisaL Feb 2015 #9
Yeah, and Jenner wasn't accused of doing that, so I don't think we should be saying he was reckless pnwmom Feb 2015 #12
The police are getting a warrant Lonusca Feb 2015 #115
you weren't by your own words stating that you were fleeing being chased nor are there pictures roguevalley Feb 2015 #28
I was kind of on his side until cwydro Feb 2015 #36
What kind of "fleeing" was needed, that results in driving that kills people? braddy Feb 2015 #4
We don't know. If you had multiple drivers crowding you from behind and to the side, pnwmom Feb 2015 #16
I've done a lot of driving, and if people aren't shooting at you, or deliberately trying to kill braddy Feb 2015 #24
I've got to agree. Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #32
Can't you at least pretend to care about the woman who died???? Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #34
I feel sorry for everyone concerned. That's beside the point. pnwmom Feb 2015 #35
I do too. I don't understand why everyone else seems determined to give the papparazi a pass. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #45
I don't either. Nor do I understand pnwmom Feb 2015 #47
Drive slowly and pay attention. cwydro Feb 2015 #39
Isnt Diana dead because of this kind of deal? NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #11
Yes, and she being driven by a professional driver. And I remember there was more than one pnwmom Feb 2015 #13
Diana's "professional" driver was liquored up having been drinking Cleita Feb 2015 #17
And if Diana's professional driver had just driven the speed limit... FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #18
And if he were sober, he might have made a sensible decision to do just that Cleita Feb 2015 #21
A whole lot of assumptions there elias7 Feb 2015 #53
I read that he passed the field sobriety tests. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #80
I followed the story at the time, and it seemed to be irrefutable that he was intoxicated. Chemisse Feb 2015 #86
so they said. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #46
Diana's Driver was drunk JI7 Feb 2015 #20
That is open to debate elias7 Feb 2015 #50
PCH is a dangerous road. There are hardly any intersections because of Cleita Feb 2015 #15
Yup and still is dangerous. zappaman Feb 2015 #22
Especially since there is a paved bike path over the beach away from the Cleita Feb 2015 #25
Exactly! zappaman Feb 2015 #27
Me too! cwydro Feb 2015 #42
US1 in the keys is deadly FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #44
I also used to ride on 535 I think it is cwydro Feb 2015 #109
that is where I got my first drivers license! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #104
Is that the one that caught fire? cwydro Feb 2015 #110
No but that is where I lived....Big Pine Key! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #116
Seen some bad wrecks there cwydro Feb 2015 #117
didnt Ben Vereen get hit by someone famous on pch? Liberal_in_LA Feb 2015 #63
Vehicular homicide. I don't care if there's a goddamned parade float behind you.. X_Digger Feb 2015 #29
^^^this^^^ TheCowsCameHome Feb 2015 #51
Everyone knows a rear-end collision is the fault of the person who rear-ends the other. cwydro Feb 2015 #56
Yes it is. 840high Feb 2015 #79
The whole thing about fleeing paps is just TMZ sensational garbage. Nailzberg Feb 2015 #52
There are photos of the incident. So obviously paps were there right next to the car. LisaL Feb 2015 #58
That's what the restaurant owner said. The paps were there immediately. That's hard to explain pnwmom Feb 2015 #66
it's not hard to explain, many "celebs" tip off the paps because they want to be talked about JI7 Feb 2015 #76
Its easy to explain. Paps follow people to were they're going. Doesn't make it a chase. Nailzberg Feb 2015 #89
He was deliberately being followed. Whether he was chased or not, the paps were pnwmom Feb 2015 #90
Your statements are becoming increasingly absurd as this thread goes on. X_Digger Feb 2015 #92
Yes, you have that right. In some circumstances, one citizen shouldn't be allowed to follow pnwmom Feb 2015 #93
so pass a fucking law to stop it, but in the case of Jenner/Kardashian family they WELCOME the JI7 Feb 2015 #94
Actually, there is such a law in California. So I guess we'll see whether it applies. pnwmom Feb 2015 #95
Yes, but he is followed everywhere he goes. Its nothing new to him. Likely wasn't his distraction. Nailzberg Feb 2015 #97
I doubt that this 65 year old was followed very much till the transgender stories appeared. pnwmom Feb 2015 #99
then you haven't been paying attention , the entire fucking family WANTED to be followed and got JI7 Feb 2015 #101
No matter. It's against the law in California for photographers to follow people who are driving. pnwmom Feb 2015 #102
Those moment of impact photos? Taken from across the street and from the opposite direction? Nailzberg Feb 2015 #88
More than one pap vehicle could have been involved, as is often the case. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #103
And he's always photographed getting gas in the area, R B Garr Feb 2015 #105
I'm reminded of the Claymation segment in "Moonwalker..." Archae Feb 2015 #57
Latest from NYTimes cwydro Feb 2015 #82
Well, there goes his reality show and career, and I hope he gets the book thrown at him dissentient Feb 2015 #83
Why? For what could have been a moment of distraction? pnwmom Feb 2015 #91
So you dont agree he should be able to hire good lawyers??? Nt Logical Feb 2015 #108
I don't see how that is a valid excuse. Chemisse Feb 2015 #85
Maybe it isn't. But I don't see how it's a valid practice for paparazzi to shoot photos pnwmom Feb 2015 #87
I agree. It must be horrific trying to live like that. Chemisse Feb 2015 #107
"a crime in California ... to follow a car more closely than is reasonable and prudent" aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2015 #98
I've noticed that. It may be especially unnerving when you're an out-of-stater who's not used to it. pnwmom Feb 2015 #100
i figured it was something like this. or i KNEW they were involved. pansypoo53219 Feb 2015 #106
so????? One still has to obey the law and keep a safe distance so as to avoid rear-end collisions DrDan Feb 2015 #113
Even if that's true... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bruce Jenner: I was fleei...»Reply #15