Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bruce Jenner: I was fleeing paparazzi before the crash. [View all]Cleita
(75,480 posts)15. PCH is a dangerous road. There are hardly any intersections because of
Last edited Sat Feb 7, 2015, 11:46 PM - Edit history (1)
cliffs on one side and beach on the other side. That makes people tend to go too fast. If one person disrupts the flow of traffic accidents happen. I have seen many accidents and fatalities on that stretch of road all the way to Zuma Beach over the many years I lived in Santa Monica. Jenner should have waited until he reached one of the canyon roads where it would have been easy to ditch them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The only reason paparazzi are chasing him now is because of he's about to out himself as transgender
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#62
this family has welcomes paparazzi for some years now , that's how they make a lot of money
JI7
Feb 2015
#75
we knwo there was an accident and someone died and jenner was in the car that hit the woman who died
JI7
Feb 2015
#38
IF what Jenner said is true -- and I acknowledge we don't know you -- then I think
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#41
BS , there are bigger stars who get far more paparazzi after them and don't cause accidents like
JI7
Feb 2015
#43
what's dangerous is how Jenner was driving, that family makes a living with their relationship with
JI7
Feb 2015
#49
check out the pics before he hits the car, at least one looks like he is looking down at something
JI7
Feb 2015
#59
You're right -- it only takes a second. Which is why it's wrong for paparazzi to shoot photos
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#61
It doesn't automatically excuse him -- but it makes them share some of the responsibility, in my opinion.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#68
I don't know what the circumstances are, so I don't know if he deserves any penalty.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#71
Being distracted by a cell phone (while driving) and causing an accident is reckless.
LisaL
Feb 2015
#9
Yeah, and Jenner wasn't accused of doing that, so I don't think we should be saying he was reckless
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#12
you weren't by your own words stating that you were fleeing being chased nor are there pictures
roguevalley
Feb 2015
#28
We don't know. If you had multiple drivers crowding you from behind and to the side,
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#16
I've done a lot of driving, and if people aren't shooting at you, or deliberately trying to kill
braddy
Feb 2015
#24
I do too. I don't understand why everyone else seems determined to give the papparazi a pass.
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#45
Yes, and she being driven by a professional driver. And I remember there was more than one
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#13
I followed the story at the time, and it seemed to be irrefutable that he was intoxicated.
Chemisse
Feb 2015
#86
Vehicular homicide. I don't care if there's a goddamned parade float behind you..
X_Digger
Feb 2015
#29
Everyone knows a rear-end collision is the fault of the person who rear-ends the other.
cwydro
Feb 2015
#56
There are photos of the incident. So obviously paps were there right next to the car.
LisaL
Feb 2015
#58
That's what the restaurant owner said. The paps were there immediately. That's hard to explain
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#66
it's not hard to explain, many "celebs" tip off the paps because they want to be talked about
JI7
Feb 2015
#76
Its easy to explain. Paps follow people to were they're going. Doesn't make it a chase.
Nailzberg
Feb 2015
#89
Yes, you have that right. In some circumstances, one citizen shouldn't be allowed to follow
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#93
so pass a fucking law to stop it, but in the case of Jenner/Kardashian family they WELCOME the
JI7
Feb 2015
#94
Actually, there is such a law in California. So I guess we'll see whether it applies.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#95
Yes, but he is followed everywhere he goes. Its nothing new to him. Likely wasn't his distraction.
Nailzberg
Feb 2015
#97
I doubt that this 65 year old was followed very much till the transgender stories appeared.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#99
then you haven't been paying attention , the entire fucking family WANTED to be followed and got
JI7
Feb 2015
#101
No matter. It's against the law in California for photographers to follow people who are driving.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#102
Those moment of impact photos? Taken from across the street and from the opposite direction?
Nailzberg
Feb 2015
#88
Well, there goes his reality show and career, and I hope he gets the book thrown at him
dissentient
Feb 2015
#83
Maybe it isn't. But I don't see how it's a valid practice for paparazzi to shoot photos
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#87
"a crime in California ... to follow a car more closely than is reasonable and prudent"
aint_no_life_nowhere
Feb 2015
#98
I've noticed that. It may be especially unnerving when you're an out-of-stater who's not used to it.
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#100