Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It's no excuse. FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #1
Without knowing the circumstances how do you know? pnwmom Feb 2015 #2
Lots of things and other drivers can cause distractions FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #5
Easy for you to say. You must be a perfect driver, never distracted by anything. pnwmom Feb 2015 #6
This isn't about me, and that's a silly argument/tactic. FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #19
agreed FL CatWoman Feb 2015 #26
that's the thing that makes me most angry about this JI7 Feb 2015 #30
The only reason paparazzi are chasing him now is because of he's about to out himself as transgender pnwmom Feb 2015 #62
Not really, it's because he's a *famous* person who is transgender. cui bono Feb 2015 #70
And he's famous because he was an Olympic Medalist decades ago. pnwmom Feb 2015 #72
No. He's famous now because he was on a reality show with the Kardashians. cui bono Feb 2015 #74
They wouldn't be chasing him now if it weren't for the transgender story. pnwmom Feb 2015 #81
two words CatWoman Feb 2015 #84
this family has welcomes paparazzi for some years now , that's how they make a lot of money JI7 Feb 2015 #75
+10 840high Feb 2015 #78
Just like gun owners???? They are model citizens until they aren't. madinmaryland Feb 2015 #67
Everybody gets distracted at some point... RichGirl Feb 2015 #111
As others have said, he chose this life. Kaleva Feb 2015 #37
Actually, no. He didn't choose to be born a woman in a man's body. pnwmom Feb 2015 #65
He choose to be a reality tv and check out magazine celebrity. Kaleva Feb 2015 #77
EVERYBODY has things in their lives that they have no control over. RichGirl Feb 2015 #112
wanting to be famous when it suits you is no excuse. He wasn't in roguevalley Feb 2015 #3
How do you know he drove recklessly? I was hit from behind by someone pnwmom Feb 2015 #7
You don't think it's reckless to drive distracted by a cell phone? n/t Exhibit A Feb 2015 #8
I think that IS an example of driving recklessly. But I haven't heard evidence pnwmom Feb 2015 #10
Nonsense. Exhibit A Feb 2015 #14
Tell that to the widow of Milton Olin ga_girl Feb 2015 #23
I am invested in the idea of not judging people before the facts are in. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #33
we knwo there was an accident and someone died and jenner was in the car that hit the woman who died JI7 Feb 2015 #38
IF what Jenner said is true -- and I acknowledge we don't know you -- then I think pnwmom Feb 2015 #41
BS , there are bigger stars who get far more paparazzi after them and don't cause accidents like JI7 Feb 2015 #43
So what? It still shouldn't be legal, even if it is rare. It's too dangerous pnwmom Feb 2015 #48
what's dangerous is how Jenner was driving, that family makes a living with their relationship with JI7 Feb 2015 #49
What do you know about how he was driving? pnwmom Feb 2015 #96
Not sure I agree given his recent news elias7 Feb 2015 #54
When you hit somone in front of you, you are driving recklessly Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #31
He claims he was trying to avoid paparazzi kcr Feb 2015 #40
Dollars to doughnuts cwydro Feb 2015 #55
check out the pics before he hits the car, at least one looks like he is looking down at something JI7 Feb 2015 #59
I saw that too. cwydro Feb 2015 #60
You're right -- it only takes a second. Which is why it's wrong for paparazzi to shoot photos pnwmom Feb 2015 #61
Hey, I totally agree on the pap part of this story. cwydro Feb 2015 #64
It doesn't automatically excuse him -- but it makes them share some of the responsibility, in my opinion. pnwmom Feb 2015 #68
I'll agree with you there. cwydro Feb 2015 #69
I don't know what the circumstances are, so I don't know if he deserves any penalty. pnwmom Feb 2015 #71
Yeah, I'm just going on the premise cwydro Feb 2015 #73
Being distracted by a cell phone (while driving) and causing an accident is reckless. LisaL Feb 2015 #9
Yeah, and Jenner wasn't accused of doing that, so I don't think we should be saying he was reckless pnwmom Feb 2015 #12
The police are getting a warrant Lonusca Feb 2015 #115
you weren't by your own words stating that you were fleeing being chased nor are there pictures roguevalley Feb 2015 #28
I was kind of on his side until cwydro Feb 2015 #36
What kind of "fleeing" was needed, that results in driving that kills people? braddy Feb 2015 #4
We don't know. If you had multiple drivers crowding you from behind and to the side, pnwmom Feb 2015 #16
I've done a lot of driving, and if people aren't shooting at you, or deliberately trying to kill braddy Feb 2015 #24
I've got to agree. Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #32
Can't you at least pretend to care about the woman who died???? Yo_Mama Feb 2015 #34
I feel sorry for everyone concerned. That's beside the point. pnwmom Feb 2015 #35
I do too. I don't understand why everyone else seems determined to give the papparazi a pass. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #45
I don't either. Nor do I understand pnwmom Feb 2015 #47
Drive slowly and pay attention. cwydro Feb 2015 #39
Isnt Diana dead because of this kind of deal? NoJusticeNoPeace Feb 2015 #11
Yes, and she being driven by a professional driver. And I remember there was more than one pnwmom Feb 2015 #13
Diana's "professional" driver was liquored up having been drinking Cleita Feb 2015 #17
And if Diana's professional driver had just driven the speed limit... FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #18
And if he were sober, he might have made a sensible decision to do just that Cleita Feb 2015 #21
A whole lot of assumptions there elias7 Feb 2015 #53
I read that he passed the field sobriety tests. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #80
I followed the story at the time, and it seemed to be irrefutable that he was intoxicated. Chemisse Feb 2015 #86
so they said. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #46
Diana's Driver was drunk JI7 Feb 2015 #20
That is open to debate elias7 Feb 2015 #50
PCH is a dangerous road. There are hardly any intersections because of Cleita Feb 2015 #15
Yup and still is dangerous. zappaman Feb 2015 #22
Especially since there is a paved bike path over the beach away from the Cleita Feb 2015 #25
Exactly! zappaman Feb 2015 #27
Me too! cwydro Feb 2015 #42
US1 in the keys is deadly FLPanhandle Feb 2015 #44
I also used to ride on 535 I think it is cwydro Feb 2015 #109
that is where I got my first drivers license! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #104
Is that the one that caught fire? cwydro Feb 2015 #110
No but that is where I lived....Big Pine Key! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #116
Seen some bad wrecks there cwydro Feb 2015 #117
didnt Ben Vereen get hit by someone famous on pch? Liberal_in_LA Feb 2015 #63
Vehicular homicide. I don't care if there's a goddamned parade float behind you.. X_Digger Feb 2015 #29
^^^this^^^ TheCowsCameHome Feb 2015 #51
Everyone knows a rear-end collision is the fault of the person who rear-ends the other. cwydro Feb 2015 #56
Yes it is. 840high Feb 2015 #79
The whole thing about fleeing paps is just TMZ sensational garbage. Nailzberg Feb 2015 #52
There are photos of the incident. So obviously paps were there right next to the car. LisaL Feb 2015 #58
That's what the restaurant owner said. The paps were there immediately. That's hard to explain pnwmom Feb 2015 #66
it's not hard to explain, many "celebs" tip off the paps because they want to be talked about JI7 Feb 2015 #76
Its easy to explain. Paps follow people to were they're going. Doesn't make it a chase. Nailzberg Feb 2015 #89
He was deliberately being followed. Whether he was chased or not, the paps were pnwmom Feb 2015 #90
Your statements are becoming increasingly absurd as this thread goes on. X_Digger Feb 2015 #92
Yes, you have that right. In some circumstances, one citizen shouldn't be allowed to follow pnwmom Feb 2015 #93
so pass a fucking law to stop it, but in the case of Jenner/Kardashian family they WELCOME the JI7 Feb 2015 #94
Actually, there is such a law in California. So I guess we'll see whether it applies. pnwmom Feb 2015 #95
Yes, but he is followed everywhere he goes. Its nothing new to him. Likely wasn't his distraction. Nailzberg Feb 2015 #97
I doubt that this 65 year old was followed very much till the transgender stories appeared. pnwmom Feb 2015 #99
then you haven't been paying attention , the entire fucking family WANTED to be followed and got JI7 Feb 2015 #101
No matter. It's against the law in California for photographers to follow people who are driving. pnwmom Feb 2015 #102
Those moment of impact photos? Taken from across the street and from the opposite direction? Nailzberg Feb 2015 #88
More than one pap vehicle could have been involved, as is often the case. n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #103
And he's always photographed getting gas in the area, R B Garr Feb 2015 #105
I'm reminded of the Claymation segment in "Moonwalker..." Archae Feb 2015 #57
Latest from NYTimes cwydro Feb 2015 #82
Well, there goes his reality show and career, and I hope he gets the book thrown at him dissentient Feb 2015 #83
Why? For what could have been a moment of distraction? pnwmom Feb 2015 #91
So you dont agree he should be able to hire good lawyers??? Nt Logical Feb 2015 #108
I don't see how that is a valid excuse. Chemisse Feb 2015 #85
Maybe it isn't. But I don't see how it's a valid practice for paparazzi to shoot photos pnwmom Feb 2015 #87
I agree. It must be horrific trying to live like that. Chemisse Feb 2015 #107
"a crime in California ... to follow a car more closely than is reasonable and prudent" aint_no_life_nowhere Feb 2015 #98
I've noticed that. It may be especially unnerving when you're an out-of-stater who's not used to it. pnwmom Feb 2015 #100
i figured it was something like this. or i KNEW they were involved. pansypoo53219 Feb 2015 #106
so????? One still has to obey the law and keep a safe distance so as to avoid rear-end collisions DrDan Feb 2015 #113
Even if that's true... NaturalHigh Feb 2015 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bruce Jenner: I was fleei...»Reply #27