Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can someone tell me the saga of the poster known as "Better Believe It" [View all]ellie
(6,965 posts)54. YES! He was my favorite too!
He did flame out spectacularly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
185 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Can someone tell me the saga of the poster known as "Better Believe It" [View all]
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
OP
Long time troll, stayed on the fence as much as possible, but finally went too far.
randome
Mar 2015
#1
I lose track of time. Was it 2 years ago? 3? Maybe you were on hiatus from DU then?
randome
Mar 2015
#3
I don't remember him all that much or at all...He's green* . I'm blue,
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#12
Yeah, I didn't want to say it. Some folks are clearly looking for a reason to alert...
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#45
Exactly. That post was not even close to personal attack. But obviously some hit dogs hollered
Number23
Mar 2015
#153
Interesting. So posting something from Matt Rothschild and the Progressive makes you a RW troll??
RufusTFirefly
Mar 2015
#94
No, posting something from The Weekly Standard, Avik Roy and Tim Carney make you a RW troll...
SidDithers
Mar 2015
#113
And to add to the other reply to you, completely mischaracterizing what the President said in order
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#123
My "favorite" was Seventh Son who said the CIA gave Jamaican men man boobs.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#10
No, you rec'ed a crazy attack on the President that even had Skinner, who stays out of
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#36
All the good intentions in the world are no reason to recommend a crazy and dishonest OP.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#49
Nope, this is a forum. Everyone can see it. It's not a private discussion between you and I.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#61
Do my contentions stand up against yours? Well I don't quote antisemites for backup
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#176
No, I may not have worded it elegantly, but the point is Skinner said it didnt say what BBI said it
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#115
I don't think the chance that is coincidence is very high. Admins should look into that alert.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#42
Before I clicked on the list of reccers, I made a mental list of who is likely to be named there
Sheepshank
Mar 2015
#50
A belief that people here only rec OPs that they agree with is......interesting.
djean111
Mar 2015
#55
Nope, I made no such comment. You find it embarrassing because it is, not because of what I wrote.nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#76
I guess I didn't see that one --an epic post-- and nice work by you msanthrope.
panader0
Mar 2015
#167
Too bad getting shitcanned for right-wing trollery only seems to happen in GD / LBN
Scootaloo
Mar 2015
#128
No--and I'd mock anybody who cited Tucker Carlson's rag into the ground. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#137
Read also for the simpletons having the time of their lives yukking it up in that thread
Number23
Mar 2015
#156
No, but msanthrope's chums SidDithers and zappaman found much in common with SDuderstadt.
Octafish
Mar 2015
#44
Just as I expected, first one off the bat doesnt say what you imply it says.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#66
Its a forum. Anyone can respond to you on any comment. That doesnt make it tag team. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#73
Hey, I know you are embarrassed by your rec and you should be. That's not my fault. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#78
What I "wonder" is how someone ends up quoting and rec'ing so many trolls and antisemites
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#175
PMs from one to you means nothing. And finally your fourth link above, which I have to
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#120
He seems to believe any disagreement with him constitutes a right wing conspiracy.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#122
Show where I post ''hypothetically, mocking laughable conspiracy theory bullshit''
Octafish
Mar 2015
#92
Yes, you have implied it constantly. Disagreeing with you=pro right wing. You've implied that again
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#119
And in your world, that includes them denigrating BBI who it turns out was a right wing troll? nt
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#63
Octa....I never claimed to be as good as Sid and Zappa....but they were correct. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2015
#105
Actually, it seems to come up in response to a whole lot of people who are in good standing.
Marr
Mar 2015
#70
Purists and right wingers are mutually exclusive as used on this board.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2015
#19
That's your interpretation and spin. Another interpretation, which has more evidence, is to
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#25
It has everything to do with what you said as I am sure most who read it and your comments will note
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#30
I have no problem with comparing recs. That's part of the transparency of DU.
stevenleser
Mar 2015
#142
I doubt that either variety of troll employs more dishonest attacks or spurious arguments than the
Marr
Mar 2015
#165
Used to get hundreds of recs for constant anti-Dem, especially anti-Obama tirades. Sound familiar?
Tarheel_Dem
Mar 2015
#152