Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
5. In Law there is always assumptions, right?
Wed Mar 11, 2015, 04:48 PM
Mar 2015

Now, even though part of the Law is not clear based on the action of the parties involved, we can assume that their action is what defines this clause. Yes the Law is clearly conflicting in this area, but we can also assume that this area is at the descresion of the attorney to define the actions of said Senators.

Although most assume that means without authority of the Executive Branch, the Logan Act itself does not specify what this term means, and the State Department told Congress in 1975 that “Nothing in section 953 . . . would appear to restrict members of the Congress from engaging in discussions with foreign officials in pursuance of their legislative duties under the Constitution.”


What legislative duties are those? That is the area I'm looking, does it include contacting a nation that the country is about to go to war with, or negotiation with crucial disagreement? I'm sure there are other areas in Congressional Law that can be tied in with The Logan Act that will show violation., right?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It IS The Logan Act that ...»Reply #5