Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)

7. Advice and Consent?

Reply to Hutzpa (Reply #5)

Wed Mar 11, 2015, 05:01 PM

Mar 2015

What legislative duties are those?

In the United States, "advice and consent" is a power of the United States Senate to be consulted on and approve treaties signed and appointments made by the President of the United States to public positions, including Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, United States Attorneys, and ambassadors. This power is also held by several state Senates, which are consulted on and approve various appointments made by the state's chief executive, such as some statewide officials, state departmental heads in the Governor's cabinet, and state judges (in some states).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advice_and_consent

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It IS The Logan Act that has been violated by the 47 Senators. [View all] Hutzpa Mar 2015 OP

Or not. Here's the problem (or problems) with the Logan Act: The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #1

In Law there is always assumptions, right? Hutzpa Mar 2015 #5

Advice and Consent? dumbcat Mar 2015 #7

I think you left out the most important part Hutzpa Mar 2015 #8

You asked what legislative duties dumbcat Mar 2015 #9

The charge turns on the phrase "without authority" hootinholler Mar 2015 #2

But if we interpret the law that way then any elected official SomethingFishy Mar 2015 #13

Won't pass the test LynnTTT Mar 2015 #3

To my understanding, individual Senators have no Blue Meany Mar 2015 #4

Very good point Hutzpa Mar 2015 #6

I'm afraid you have it turned around. It's not us that has the Republicans by the short and curly's. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #10

Surely you can't be serious. Hutzpa Mar 2015 #12

Actually, I'm very serious. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #14

I'm not overly concerned with your scenario either but I find it interesting TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2015 #11

18 USC 2384 "Private Correspondence With Foreign Governments" onenote Mar 2015 #16