Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. The guy once sounded liberal in the Princeton sense of ''Service''...
Mon Mar 16, 2015, 02:54 PM
Mar 2015

From 2013:



Exposing the Real Politics of Jeff Bezos: Privatization, Big Business, Lower Taxes on the Rich—Is That the Future of the Washington Post?

Like so many tech billionaires, Bezos is attracted to right-libertarian politics.

By Zaid Jilani / AlterNet August 7, 2013

News broke on Monday that Amazon founder Jeff Bezos would be purchasing the Washington Post. (Previous owner Donald Graham is now free to focus on Kaplan, the for-profit education empire specializing in gobbling up taxpayer dollars.)

For many, Bezos is an enigmatic businessman and a gifted entrepreneur who represents all that is great about American industry. In some ways, this description does have merit. While he studied to be a physicist and had a brief stint on Wall Street, his passion was was Amazon.com, which he set up in the garage of his two-bedroom home using tables he made out of doors purchased at Home Depot for around $60 each. As Amazon grew to the titan it is today, so did Bezos’s fame and fortune. By 2011, he was the 13th richest person in the United States, with a net worth of $19.1 billion.

But as Bezos’ wealth has growth, so has his ability to impact politics. While his spending on shaping society has been relatively modest compared to, say, Walmart heirs the Waltons, or New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, he has poured a sizeable amount of money into promoting his views.

What are those views? Like so many tech billionaires, Bezos has been attracted to right-libertarian politics—meaning socially liberal, but in favor of business and privatization. “He's a libertarian,” Nick Hanauer, a colleague who was an early Amazon investor, told the Seattle Times.

Bezos has particularly played up his social views. In 2012, a former Amazon employee named Jennifer Cast wrote to him, asking him to donate in support of a campaign to defend same-sex marriage rights in a Washington ballot referendum. “Jen,” he replied on behalf of himself and his wife MacKenzie. “This is right for so many reasons. We’re in for $2.5 million.” His foray into the gay rights battle in the state made national headlines, with the Seattle Times calling it “likely the largest political contribution to a gay-marriage campaign in the country.”

But what has not made news is Bezos’ careful activism on behalf of big business and some of the richest Americans. In 2010, a coalition of Washington state public interest groups, teachers and socially minded wealthy Americans like Hanauer and Bill Gates Sr. supported Initiative 1098, which would have established the first-ever income tax in the state. If passed, the initiative would’ve established a tax on adjusted gross income for individuals earning more than $200,000 a year and $400,000 on married couples or domestic partners. By taxing high-income Washingtonians, the initiative would also have allowed for a reduction in property taxes and the expansion of certain business tax credits.

Yet while Nick Hanauer was a strong backer of the initiative, the Amazon tycoon spent $100,000 to defeat it. “There’s almost nothing I could have predicted with more precision than that Jeff would hate the idea,” Hanauer told the Seattle Times. The initiative went on to fail by over 30 percentage points.

Bezos summed up his capitalist philosophy in an interview he conducted nine years earlier. “I think people should carefully reread the first part of the Declaration of Independence,” he told the interviewer. “Because I think sometimes we as a society start to get confused and think that we have a right to happiness, but if you read the Declaration of Independence, it talks about ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ Nobody has a right to happiness. You should have a right to pursue it, and I think the core of that is liberty.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.alternet.org/media/what-will-washington-post-be-under-jeff-bezos



...now he's giving off a distinct PNAC "I Will Surive" vibe.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What are Jeff Bezo's politics, anyway? leveymg Mar 2015 #1
The guy once sounded liberal in the Princeton sense of ''Service''... Octafish Mar 2015 #2
So Bezo sets up a "right to happiness" strawman and knocks it down to justify his love of money? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #6
How did he get dragged into this? KamaAina Mar 2015 #3
He's a Libertarian. Socially liberal, but Right on issues like war and economics. sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #9
I'd say, there's no real line between D and R on foreign policy, now, but where is Bezos on this? leveymg Mar 2015 #10
He also put big bucks into buying the WaPo... JHB Mar 2015 #18
Oh, right. I must have blocked that out. KamaAina Mar 2015 #23
Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran KamaAina Mar 2015 #4
Marching to AIPAC's Tune Octafish Mar 2015 #7
We should ask Colon Powell if he has any evidence that Iran has pipes that look like irregation rhett o rick Mar 2015 #12
Hey don't forget the radio control airplane Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2015 #28
Thanks, I did forget. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #32
Stop quoting Panama Johnnie! n/t RoccoR5955 Mar 2015 #13
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that these neocons have had Iran as their sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #5
War with Iran sounds crazy. War with Russia sounds like it would be suicidal. Octafish Mar 2015 #11
Muravchik has been blowing that horn for years now Electric Monk Mar 2015 #8
Thanks! The guy's a Fellow of the 'George W Bush Institute' Octafish Mar 2015 #16
So many painful memories - thanks, I think... erronis Mar 2015 #17
I wrote the comment in the last sentence. Archae Mar 2015 #29
Neocons = Fascist Nazis Enthusiast Mar 2015 #14
What the Reichsmarschall said also can apply to DU. Octafish Mar 2015 #20
I'm convinced. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #42
People like Leo Strauss and Paul Wolfowitz, who believe they are so clever and intelligent, are Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #43
Now, why exactly are we suppose to bomb Iran? KansDem Mar 2015 #15
Because it't the only Islamic country in the ME not under the boot of the US military n/t eridani Mar 2015 #19
Money. Logistics. Netanyahu. Octafish Mar 2015 #24
I am sick of this war nonsense. I am sick of these war makers. Their minds are poisoned with Dont call me Shirley Mar 2015 #21
They stand to make a killing off death and suffering. Octafish Mar 2015 #27
Awwww. Did daddy take your toys away? LiberalLovinLug Mar 2015 #22
The Pitfalls of Peace Octafish Mar 2015 #33
Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Mar 2015 #25
War has been the rights objective for years liberal N proud Mar 2015 #26
Essential knowledge: look up "Project for a New American Century" aka PNAC Man from Pickens Mar 2015 #30
where is Richard Perle these days, I wonder? nt grasswire Mar 2015 #31
Do you trust Iran's Leadership??? nt greytdemocrat Mar 2015 #34
Not if it is as corrupt as ours. Octafish Mar 2015 #41
And when the last drug cocktails for lethal injections are dispensed, these are the same fucks that lonestarnot Mar 2015 #35
''War with Iran is probably our best option'' is what the Washington Post said. Octafish Mar 2015 #46
Draft dodging neo cons, nilesobek Mar 2015 #36
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #44
K&R for the original post and subsequent informative posts and links. JEB Mar 2015 #37
Jeb is a PNAC-signing Neocon. nt wiggs Mar 2015 #38
The instant we get off oil, we will stop hearing about what a threat Iran is. Marr Mar 2015 #39
It ain't bullshit. Iran could attack Israel any time now. Enthusiast Mar 2015 #45
well, bush & cheney got away with an 'aggressive war' spanone Mar 2015 #40
Thank goodness it's in print in a paper known nationally.. fadedrose Mar 2015 #47
We should listen to the neocons because they were so right about Iraq Martin Eden Mar 2015 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Neocon Admits the Plan ...»Reply #2