Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats used to stand for principles [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)117. Same goes for Florida...or ANY state.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz should have been kicked to the curb in 2008.
The fact that she wasn't raises alot of nasty questions about the Party Leadership.
In 2008 Debbie Wasserman Schultz refused to endorse these 3 Democrats
who had won their Primaries and had a chance to win Republican seats:
Miami-Dade Democratic Party Chair Joe Garcia
Former Hialeah Democratic Mayor Raul Martinez
Democratic businesswoman Annette Taddeo
All three had won their local Democratic Primaries, and were challenging Hard Core Republican incumbents with whom Wasserman-Schultz had become cozy.
Not only did the head of the DCCC Red to Blue Program REFUSE to endorse these Democratic challengers,
but she appeared in person at at least one (possibly more) Campaign/Fundraiser for their Republican opponents.
FL-18, FL-21, FL-25: Wasserman Schultz Wants Dem Challengers to Lose
by: James L.
Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 7:15 PM EDT
<snip>
Sensing a shift in the political climate of the traditionally solid-GOP turf of the Miami area, Democrats have lined up three strong challengers -- Miami-Dade Democratic Party chair Joe Garcia, former Hialeah Mayor Raul Martinez, and businesswoman Annette Taddeo to take on Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, respectively.
While there is an enormous sense of excitement and optimism surrounding these candidacies, some Democratic lawmakers, including Florida Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Kendrick Meek, are all too eager to kneecap these Democratic challengers right out of the starting gate in the spirit of "comity" and "bipartisan cooperation" with their Republican colleagues:
But as three Miami Democrats look to unseat three of her South Florida Republican colleagues, Wasserman Schultz is staying on the sidelines. So is Rep. Kendrick Meek, a Miami Democrat and loyal ally to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
This time around, Wasserman Schultz and Meek say their relationships with the Republican incumbents, Reps. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and his brother Mario, and Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, leave them little choice but to sit out the three races.
"At the end of the day, we need a member who isn't going to pull any punches, who isn't going to be hesitant," Wasserman Schultz said.
Now, you'd expect this kind of bullshit from a backbencher like Alcee Hastings, but you wouldn't expect this kind of behavior from the co-chair of the DCCC's Red to Blue program, which is the position that Wasserman Schultz currently holds. Apparently, Debbie did not get Rahm's memo about doing whatever it takes to win:
The national party, enthusiastic about the three Democratic challengers, has not yet selected Red to Blue participants. But Wasserman Schultz has already told the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee that if any of the three make the cut, another Democrat should be assigned to the race.
http://www.swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1537
The bloggers also are furious with Rep. Kendrick B. Meek (D-Fla.), who similarly refuses to endorse the Democratic challengers to the three Cuban American Republicans.
They are calling for Wasserman Schultz to step down from her leadership role at the DCCC. And they're not letting up, even after one Florida liberal blogger reported that the congresswoman seemed "frustrated" by the blogs and had asked to "please help get them off my back."
This prompted even harsher reaction from perhaps the most influential of the progressive political bloggers, Markos Moulitsas, a.k.a. Kos, founder of Daily Kos, who wrote on his blog Wednesday: "On so many fronts, the Republicans are standing in the way of progress, on Iraq, SCHIP, health care, fiscal responsibility, corruption, civil liberties, and so on. Those three south Florida Republicans are part of that problem. And she's (Wasserman-Schultz) going to be 'frustrated' that people demand she do her job?"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/19/AR2008031903410_3.html
Here are Kos comments on the Wasserman-Schultz betrayal of the Democratic Party:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/03/20/480511/-DCCC-Says-Uproar-Over-DWS-Recusal-Much-Ado-About-Nothing
A lot of time has passed since 2008, but I don't take these kinds of betrayals lightly.
bvar22
Cursed with a memory
"I want to thank Debbie Wasserman-Schultz for being an outstanding chair of our party. (Applause.) She is a great partner."--President Obama
With "partners" like this, we don't need Republicans!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
143 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Sounds like you are telling us to leave and vote for another political party. Is that what you think
whereisjustice
Mar 2015
#4
They apparently don't need the Left. So the Left has taken them at their word and started selecting
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#8
Thank you. The meme that finding good candidates is my job is a fucking joke, anyway.
merrily
Mar 2015
#133
Well, that's what we LEARNED. Who picked Christie for Governor of NJ, a BLUE STATE v the Dem
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#72
Obviously reading isn't your strong suit, either. It sounds like nothing of the sort.
MADem
Mar 2015
#10
Well, in Arkansas we found a great candidate for governor last year-- Bill Halter,
Art_from_Ark
Mar 2015
#34
Well, you, and others like you, need to work your way up into the "fat cat" leadership.
MADem
Mar 2015
#35
My point still stands. If your guy had critical mass, they couldn't pull any rug out from under him
MADem
Mar 2015
#43
The objective is to get money OUT of politics, to STOP the buying of candidates, not to pour MORE
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#55
It seems as if the Arkansas Democratic Party just pushed the self-destruct button
Art_from_Ark
Mar 2015
#60
One thing I've noticed is that 99% of the folks here that are always breaking their arms patting
Number23
Mar 2015
#93
We did that, in the mid terms. Didn't you notice, Liberal groups and orgs and supporters across the
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#6
Progressive WON in the last election. Now if the leadership again refuses to hear the voters,
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#13
You just don't see it. And that's what voters are talking about. It's like banging your head against
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#19
Doesn't see it, doesn't choose to see it, doesn't admit seeing it. Doesn't much matter which.
merrily
Mar 2015
#57
No. I think people should fight FOR their candidates, rather than against the candidates of others.
MADem
Mar 2015
#25
For someone chiding someone else on a grammatical error, you should realize that
cui bono
Mar 2015
#17
Sorry--you're wrong. There are "undeclared candidates" in this race, and you know it.
MADem
Mar 2015
#18
In a political race, once you declare you become a candidate, until then you are not one.
cui bono
Mar 2015
#27
Yeah, that's why Gallup and others do polls to find out how these "undeclared candidates" might
MADem
Mar 2015
#38
If all the Democratic Party has is HRC then they have nothing but fear of a Republican who is worse
anotojefiremnesuka
Mar 2015
#39
Not sure what your point was, there. Primary season is a ways away. Have a nice day. nt
MADem
Mar 2015
#40
I know you don’t otherwise I would not have responded in the first place. Enjoy your day!
anotojefiremnesuka
Mar 2015
#41
PASSIVE. "Are promptly told..." -- and what do you do? Tug your forelock and say Yessir?
MADem
Mar 2015
#107
Well thanks--it's how I sincerely feel. I would love to see some "platform talk."
MADem
Mar 2015
#109
Yeah sure except for FDR, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson and Carter and thousands of local and federal
whereisjustice
Mar 2015
#14
I find your historical whitewashing not just inaccurate, but deeply offensive
YoungDemCA
Mar 2015
#124
Do you remember Nov. 22, 1963? If not, how do you know what it was like to be ''deeply'' offended?
Octafish
Mar 2015
#128
Don't confuse an instant in time with the momentum for progress. Over the course of recent history
whereisjustice
Mar 2015
#30
The Congressional Progressive Caucus is the largest Democratic caucus within the Congress
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#48
And yet you think you need to explain to me that I also need money? What towering arrogance.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#56
I didn't pirate shit from you and don't know what this "community" of mine is.
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#59
You are preaching to me that people need jobs even as you argue that those of us who seek equal
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#64
I never said any such thing. You are putting your words into my mouth. I've spit them out.
whereisjustice
Mar 2015
#61
You: "There would be no need for a special caucus if the Democratic Party hadn't steered away from
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2015
#70
"You say there is no need for them. " - show me where I said this? Retract your misquote. You hijack
whereisjustice
Mar 2015
#84
It's easier to romanticize the Party of olden days ... that appeared to work ...
1StrongBlackMan
Mar 2015
#81
This is why all the emails just say "The Republicans did something awful. Send cash." Policy? Ha!
Scuba
Mar 2015
#44
With little else, the half-wit pretends a bumper-sticker is someone's premise, and argues against th
LanternWaste
Mar 2015
#116
Principles become inconvienent incumbrances to ambitious politicians.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2015
#77
lmfao - Let me translate your tough guy sound bite to what you really mean:
whereisjustice
Mar 2015
#100
DLC, Third Way, Progressive Policy Institute, Century for American Progress, No Labels, all
merrily
Mar 2015
#134
Hillary isn't our only option ... Lots of words ... No alternative mentioned.
JoePhilly
Mar 2015
#135