Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Neocon Admits the Plan to Bomb Iran [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)27. They stand to make a killing off death and suffering.
Ray McGovern in 2008:
...I am remembering how I was pilloried on June 16, 2005, immediately after Congressman John Conyers' rump-Judiciary Committee hearing in the bowels of the Capitol, for a candid answer to a question from one of his colleagues; i. e., if the invasion of Iraq was not about WMD, and not about non-existent ties between Iraq and al-Qaeda, then why did we attack?
In answer, I used the acronym OIL. O for oil; I for Israel; and L for Logistics, meaning the military bases deemed by neoconservatives as necessary to protect both. Neither the House members present nor the media people seemed to have any problem with oil and military bases as factors-in itself an interesting commentary.
However, the suggestion that one main motive was an attempt to make that part of the Middle East safer for Israel (yes, folks, the neocons really thought that attacking Iraq would do that) -- well, that was anathema.
As it is anathema today to suggest that this is still one of the main reasons, besides oil, that Elliott Abrams, other neocons -- not to mention Vice President Dick Cheney and his team -- insist we must stay, Maliki and his associates be damned. (See the cartoon in the Washington Times today showing Maliki and words telling him "We are NOT leaving."
CONTINUED...
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2008/07/17/obama-mccain-allergic-new-iraq-reality
Through truth, justice. Peace to You and Yours, Dont call me Shirley!
...I am remembering how I was pilloried on June 16, 2005, immediately after Congressman John Conyers' rump-Judiciary Committee hearing in the bowels of the Capitol, for a candid answer to a question from one of his colleagues; i. e., if the invasion of Iraq was not about WMD, and not about non-existent ties between Iraq and al-Qaeda, then why did we attack?
In answer, I used the acronym OIL. O for oil; I for Israel; and L for Logistics, meaning the military bases deemed by neoconservatives as necessary to protect both. Neither the House members present nor the media people seemed to have any problem with oil and military bases as factors-in itself an interesting commentary.
However, the suggestion that one main motive was an attempt to make that part of the Middle East safer for Israel (yes, folks, the neocons really thought that attacking Iraq would do that) -- well, that was anathema.
As it is anathema today to suggest that this is still one of the main reasons, besides oil, that Elliott Abrams, other neocons -- not to mention Vice President Dick Cheney and his team -- insist we must stay, Maliki and his associates be damned. (See the cartoon in the Washington Times today showing Maliki and words telling him "We are NOT leaving."

CONTINUED...
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2008/07/17/obama-mccain-allergic-new-iraq-reality
Through truth, justice. Peace to You and Yours, Dont call me Shirley!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

So Bezo sets up a "right to happiness" strawman and knocks it down to justify his love of money?
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#6
He's a Libertarian. Socially liberal, but Right on issues like war and economics.
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#9
I'd say, there's no real line between D and R on foreign policy, now, but where is Bezos on this?
leveymg
Mar 2015
#10
We should ask Colon Powell if he has any evidence that Iran has pipes that look like irregation
rhett o rick
Mar 2015
#12
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that these neocons have had Iran as their
sabrina 1
Mar 2015
#5
People like Leo Strauss and Paul Wolfowitz, who believe they are so clever and intelligent, are
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2015
#43
Because it't the only Islamic country in the ME not under the boot of the US military n/t
eridani
Mar 2015
#19
I am sick of this war nonsense. I am sick of these war makers. Their minds are poisoned with
Dont call me Shirley
Mar 2015
#21
Essential knowledge: look up "Project for a New American Century" aka PNAC
Man from Pickens
Mar 2015
#30
And when the last drug cocktails for lethal injections are dispensed, these are the same fucks that
lonestarnot
Mar 2015
#35
''War with Iran is probably our best option'' is what the Washington Post said.
Octafish
Mar 2015
#46