Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Tue Mar 17, 2015, 08:39 AM Mar 2015

"If the TPP would be as good for American jobs as they claim, there should be nothing to hide." [View all]



Lawmakers Say TPP Meetings Classified To Keep Americans in the Dark

Democratic lawmaker says tightly-controlled briefings on Trans-Pacific Partnership deal are aimed at keeping US constituents ignorant about what's at stake

byJon Queally, staff writer
byCommon Dreams, March 17, 2015

Lawmakers in Congress who remain wary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement are raising further objections this week to the degree of secrecy surrounding briefings on the deal, with some arguing that the main reason at least one meeting has been registered "classified" is to help keep the American public ignorant about giveaways to corporate interests and its long-term implications.

With a briefing set between members of Congress and U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman and the Labor Department for Wednesday, the lack of transparency and the inability to discuss openly what they learn in the meetings has especially drawn the ire of progressive Democrats who say the TPP is being jammed through without a full airing of its negative consequences.

As The Hill reports:

Members will be allowed to attend the briefing on the proposed trade pact with 12 Latin American and Asian countries with one staff member who possesses an “active Secret-level or high clearance” compliant with House security rules. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) told The Hill that the administration is being "needlessly secretive."

"Even now, when they are finally beginning to share details of the proposed deal with members of Congress, they are denying us the ability to consult with our staff or discuss details of the agreement with experts," DeLauro told The Hill.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) condemned the classified briefing.

"Making it classified further ensures that, even if we accidentally learn something, we cannot share it. What is [Froman]working so hard to hide? What is the specific legal basis for all this senseless secrecy?" Doggett said to The Hill.

"Open trade should begin with open access," Doggett said. "Members expected to vote on trade deals should be able to read the unredacted negotiating text."


"I'm not happy about it," Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) told the Huffington Post, referring to the briefing with Froman and Labor Secretary Thomas Perez on Wednesday. The meeting—focused on the section of the TPP that deals with the controversial 'Investor-State Dispute Settlement' (ISDS) mechanism—has been labeled "classified," so that lawmakers and any of their staff who attend will be barred, under threat of punishment, of revealing what they learn with constituents or outside experts.

CONTINUED...

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/03/17/lawmakers-say-tpp-meetings-classified-keep-americans-dark

Nothing to hide in our pockets when TPP's all said and done, too.
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The first thing that came flashing in front of my eyes madokie Mar 2015 #1
I love Obama. Octafish Mar 2015 #6
I also 100% trust Obama....in these times of a fascist coup do we really have a choice? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #10
No, obviously this one would be passed by a majority in both houses so it would not TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #15
A knowledge of history and international law would be helpful in a debate about treaties versus international contracts. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #16
Only four Senators voted against Froman MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #2
Froman's got dual citizenship: Wall Street and Washington Octafish Mar 2015 #5
Mind blowing MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #25
It's jaw dropping isn't it? Still scraping mine from the floor after all these years. 2banon Mar 2015 #39
That's what republicans say about our secret negotiations with Iran and other countries. n/t pampango Mar 2015 #3
It's also what my Democratic friends said about NAFTA. Octafish Mar 2015 #4
And even more republicans (the base not the politicians) say that about NAFTA and other agreements. pampango Mar 2015 #7
We've talked about this before on DU. Here's what I've found regarding NAFTA. Octafish Mar 2015 #8
To blame all bad economic events on something that is less than 3% of the economy is pampango Mar 2015 #9
These trade deals serve to lower US worker compensation. Octafish Mar 2015 #11
Really? Then why did FDR reverse the republican opposition to trade? Why do Germany and Sweden pampango Mar 2015 #14
The lesson remains that when we have similar protections in place will be when we revisit such TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #18
Perhaps we agree that 'similar protections' are what the fight should really be about, then these pampango Mar 2015 #20
Yeah, when we get them in place I'll revisit my stance. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #31
Exactly. To compare us to Germany and Sweden where labor has so much more stillwaiting Mar 2015 #37
Just because it is not the sole cause doesn't mean it's a good thing. riqster Mar 2015 #13
It was not a 'disaster' under Clinton. And it did not cause the 'disaster' under Bush. He did that pampango Mar 2015 #17
Ummmmm... kindasorta right. riqster Mar 2015 #23
I take your word on that. You obviously know more about that area. pampango Mar 2015 #24
Any non-movable job did well, yes. riqster Mar 2015 #26
And a lot of foreign auto manufacturers moved facilities here. You can't just look at one little Hoyt Mar 2015 #28
True enough. What's the overall net impact on American autoworker employment numbers acompensation? riqster Mar 2015 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Hoyt Mar 2015 #33
American cars were on a decline long before NAFTA. Computers/produ have affected demand for workers Hoyt Mar 2015 #34
Regardless, NAFTA had an impact. riqster Mar 2015 #35
What would you say if you learned that John Negroponte took full credit in Authoring NAFTA? 2banon Mar 2015 #40
Great post Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #12
Private negotiations are one thing. Private negotiators are another. Octafish Mar 2015 #36
Hey Pampang . . FairWinds Mar 2015 #19
NAFTA will be the bestest thing evah! gratuitous Mar 2015 #30
K&R 2banon Mar 2015 #21
'Progressive' Coalition for Fast Track and TPP Appears from Nowhere Octafish Mar 2015 #38
There's that logic thing again. senseandsensibility Mar 2015 #22
Are you sure Obama is going to screw us and endorse a bad agreement? Or is it possible a Hoyt Mar 2015 #27
It's good for American jobs, they are going to get a free trip overseas compliments of US taxpayers. GoneFishin Mar 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"If the TPP would be...