Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"If the TPP would be as good for American jobs as they claim, there should be nothing to hide." [View all]

Lawmakers Say TPP Meetings Classified To Keep Americans in the Dark
Democratic lawmaker says tightly-controlled briefings on Trans-Pacific Partnership deal are aimed at keeping US constituents ignorant about what's at stake
byJon Queally, staff writer
byCommon Dreams, March 17, 2015
Lawmakers in Congress who remain wary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement are raising further objections this week to the degree of secrecy surrounding briefings on the deal, with some arguing that the main reason at least one meeting has been registered "classified" is to help keep the American public ignorant about giveaways to corporate interests and its long-term implications.
With a briefing set between members of Congress and U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman and the Labor Department for Wednesday, the lack of transparency and the inability to discuss openly what they learn in the meetings has especially drawn the ire of progressive Democrats who say the TPP is being jammed through without a full airing of its negative consequences.
As The Hill reports:
Members will be allowed to attend the briefing on the proposed trade pact with 12 Latin American and Asian countries with one staff member who possesses an active Secret-level or high clearance compliant with House security rules. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) told The Hill that the administration is being "needlessly secretive."
"Even now, when they are finally beginning to share details of the proposed deal with members of Congress, they are denying us the ability to consult with our staff or discuss details of the agreement with experts," DeLauro told The Hill.
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) condemned the classified briefing.
"Making it classified further ensures that, even if we accidentally learn something, we cannot share it. What is [Froman]working so hard to hide? What is the specific legal basis for all this senseless secrecy?" Doggett said to The Hill.
"Open trade should begin with open access," Doggett said. "Members expected to vote on trade deals should be able to read the unredacted negotiating text."
"I'm not happy about it," Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) told the Huffington Post, referring to the briefing with Froman and Labor Secretary Thomas Perez on Wednesday. The meetingfocused on the section of the TPP that deals with the controversial 'Investor-State Dispute Settlement' (ISDS) mechanismhas been labeled "classified," so that lawmakers and any of their staff who attend will be barred, under threat of punishment, of revealing what they learn with constituents or outside experts.
CONTINUED...
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/03/17/lawmakers-say-tpp-meetings-classified-keep-americans-dark
Nothing to hide in our pockets when TPP's all said and done, too.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

"If the TPP would be as good for American jobs as they claim, there should be nothing to hide." [View all]
Octafish
Mar 2015
OP
I also 100% trust Obama....in these times of a fascist coup do we really have a choice?
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#10
No, obviously this one would be passed by a majority in both houses so it would not
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#15
A knowledge of history and international law would be helpful in a debate about treaties versus international contracts.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#16
It's jaw dropping isn't it? Still scraping mine from the floor after all these years.
2banon
Mar 2015
#39
That's what republicans say about our secret negotiations with Iran and other countries. n/t
pampango
Mar 2015
#3
And even more republicans (the base not the politicians) say that about NAFTA and other agreements.
pampango
Mar 2015
#7
To blame all bad economic events on something that is less than 3% of the economy is
pampango
Mar 2015
#9
Really? Then why did FDR reverse the republican opposition to trade? Why do Germany and Sweden
pampango
Mar 2015
#14
The lesson remains that when we have similar protections in place will be when we revisit such
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#18
Perhaps we agree that 'similar protections' are what the fight should really be about, then these
pampango
Mar 2015
#20
It was not a 'disaster' under Clinton. And it did not cause the 'disaster' under Bush. He did that
pampango
Mar 2015
#17
And a lot of foreign auto manufacturers moved facilities here. You can't just look at one little
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#28
True enough. What's the overall net impact on American autoworker employment numbers acompensation?
riqster
Mar 2015
#29
American cars were on a decline long before NAFTA. Computers/produ have affected demand for workers
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#34
What would you say if you learned that John Negroponte took full credit in Authoring NAFTA?
2banon
Mar 2015
#40