Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "If the TPP would be as good for American jobs as they claim, there should be nothing to hide." [View all]stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)37. Exactly. To compare us to Germany and Sweden where labor has so much more
protecting it is not reasonable.
IF we had the same labor protections as Scandinavians, THEN I might reconsider my stance on the TPP.
Since we do not have the strong labor protections of these countries it seems ridiculous to argue that free trade hasn't hurt Sweden and Germany, etc.
Workers in our country do not have anywhere near the same protections that workers in Sweden and Germany have.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

"If the TPP would be as good for American jobs as they claim, there should be nothing to hide." [View all]
Octafish
Mar 2015
OP
I also 100% trust Obama....in these times of a fascist coup do we really have a choice?
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#10
No, obviously this one would be passed by a majority in both houses so it would not
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#15
A knowledge of history and international law would be helpful in a debate about treaties versus international contracts.
Fred Sanders
Mar 2015
#16
It's jaw dropping isn't it? Still scraping mine from the floor after all these years.
2banon
Mar 2015
#39
That's what republicans say about our secret negotiations with Iran and other countries. n/t
pampango
Mar 2015
#3
And even more republicans (the base not the politicians) say that about NAFTA and other agreements.
pampango
Mar 2015
#7
To blame all bad economic events on something that is less than 3% of the economy is
pampango
Mar 2015
#9
Really? Then why did FDR reverse the republican opposition to trade? Why do Germany and Sweden
pampango
Mar 2015
#14
The lesson remains that when we have similar protections in place will be when we revisit such
TheKentuckian
Mar 2015
#18
Perhaps we agree that 'similar protections' are what the fight should really be about, then these
pampango
Mar 2015
#20
It was not a 'disaster' under Clinton. And it did not cause the 'disaster' under Bush. He did that
pampango
Mar 2015
#17
And a lot of foreign auto manufacturers moved facilities here. You can't just look at one little
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#28
True enough. What's the overall net impact on American autoworker employment numbers acompensation?
riqster
Mar 2015
#29
American cars were on a decline long before NAFTA. Computers/produ have affected demand for workers
Hoyt
Mar 2015
#34
What would you say if you learned that John Negroponte took full credit in Authoring NAFTA?
2banon
Mar 2015
#40