Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
38. 'Progressive' Coalition for Fast Track and TPP Appears from Nowhere
Thu Mar 19, 2015, 03:29 PM
Mar 2015

WRITTEN BY RICK COHEN / 17 March, 2015 / Buzzfeed 15 March, 2015

Since the days of the North American Free Trade Agreement, negotiated under the administration of President George H.W. Bush and ratified under President Bill Clinton, free trade agreements and “fast track negotiating authority” have been controversial issues, generally sought by the White House regardless of the political party and increasingly opposed by labor unions and political “progressives.” What constitutes a “progressive,” and who can claim that word, is at the heart of a controversy reported upon by Kate Nocera and Evan McMorris-Santoro for Buzzfeed.

President Obama has been supporting a new trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific Partnership and seeking fast track negotiating authority, which would basically give the White House the ability to bring the completed agreement to Congress for an up or down vote, but with no ability to amend or filibuster. Nocera and McMorris-Santoro picked up on a Politico report about a “rift” among progressives regarding the TPP.

A new, hitherto unknown entity called the “Progressive Coalition for American Jobs” has emerged with the purpose, it appears, to “give the president trade promotion authority and establish the Trans-Pacific Partnership.” The Coalition’s dot.org website takes you to a “fact sheet“ that contends that President Obama’s negotiating stance on the TPP will “level…the playing field for American workers and protect…jobs here at home.” They contend that unlike previous trade agreements, this one, under President Obama’s firm hand, would get the signatory countries to respect collective bargaining rights for their workers, prohibit “exploitative child labor and forced labor” (does that mean that there are non-exploitative versions of this?), set minimum wage and maximum work hours standards (what those might be isn’t specified), and adhere to environmental protection standards.

“There’s something weird about the group, though,” the Buzzfeed writers reveal. “No one in the Washington, D.C., progressive community seems to have ever heard of them before.”

Nocera and McMorris-Santoro reveal that the people behind his coalition, not identified on the coalition’s website, are former members of the Obama campaign team, including Mitch Stewart, who had run Organizing For America, an organization that emerged from the Obama campaign, Lynda Tran, another former OFA person, and Jeremy Bird, the campaign’s former field director who with Stewart created the campaign consulting firm 270 Strategies. According to the Buzzfeed reporters, “Tran told BuzzFeed News the purpose of the group was to boost liberal voices who support the Obama trade agenda.”

CONTINUED...

https://nonprofitquarterly.org/policysocial-context/25789-progressive-coalition-for-fast-track-and-tpp-appears-from-nowhere.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The first thing that came flashing in front of my eyes madokie Mar 2015 #1
I love Obama. Octafish Mar 2015 #6
I also 100% trust Obama....in these times of a fascist coup do we really have a choice? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #10
No, obviously this one would be passed by a majority in both houses so it would not TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #15
A knowledge of history and international law would be helpful in a debate about treaties versus international contracts. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #16
Only four Senators voted against Froman MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #2
Froman's got dual citizenship: Wall Street and Washington Octafish Mar 2015 #5
Mind blowing MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #25
It's jaw dropping isn't it? Still scraping mine from the floor after all these years. 2banon Mar 2015 #39
That's what republicans say about our secret negotiations with Iran and other countries. n/t pampango Mar 2015 #3
It's also what my Democratic friends said about NAFTA. Octafish Mar 2015 #4
And even more republicans (the base not the politicians) say that about NAFTA and other agreements. pampango Mar 2015 #7
We've talked about this before on DU. Here's what I've found regarding NAFTA. Octafish Mar 2015 #8
To blame all bad economic events on something that is less than 3% of the economy is pampango Mar 2015 #9
These trade deals serve to lower US worker compensation. Octafish Mar 2015 #11
Really? Then why did FDR reverse the republican opposition to trade? Why do Germany and Sweden pampango Mar 2015 #14
The lesson remains that when we have similar protections in place will be when we revisit such TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #18
Perhaps we agree that 'similar protections' are what the fight should really be about, then these pampango Mar 2015 #20
Yeah, when we get them in place I'll revisit my stance. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #31
Exactly. To compare us to Germany and Sweden where labor has so much more stillwaiting Mar 2015 #37
Just because it is not the sole cause doesn't mean it's a good thing. riqster Mar 2015 #13
It was not a 'disaster' under Clinton. And it did not cause the 'disaster' under Bush. He did that pampango Mar 2015 #17
Ummmmm... kindasorta right. riqster Mar 2015 #23
I take your word on that. You obviously know more about that area. pampango Mar 2015 #24
Any non-movable job did well, yes. riqster Mar 2015 #26
And a lot of foreign auto manufacturers moved facilities here. You can't just look at one little Hoyt Mar 2015 #28
True enough. What's the overall net impact on American autoworker employment numbers acompensation? riqster Mar 2015 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Hoyt Mar 2015 #33
American cars were on a decline long before NAFTA. Computers/produ have affected demand for workers Hoyt Mar 2015 #34
Regardless, NAFTA had an impact. riqster Mar 2015 #35
What would you say if you learned that John Negroponte took full credit in Authoring NAFTA? 2banon Mar 2015 #40
Great post Omaha Steve Mar 2015 #12
Private negotiations are one thing. Private negotiators are another. Octafish Mar 2015 #36
Hey Pampang . . FairWinds Mar 2015 #19
NAFTA will be the bestest thing evah! gratuitous Mar 2015 #30
K&R 2banon Mar 2015 #21
'Progressive' Coalition for Fast Track and TPP Appears from Nowhere Octafish Mar 2015 #38
There's that logic thing again. senseandsensibility Mar 2015 #22
Are you sure Obama is going to screw us and endorse a bad agreement? Or is it possible a Hoyt Mar 2015 #27
It's good for American jobs, they are going to get a free trip overseas compliments of US taxpayers. GoneFishin Mar 2015 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"If the TPP would be...»Reply #38