General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To Believe Julian Assange, You Must Believe Israel Shamir, Vicious Anti-Semite and Liar. [View all]we can believe, and I think your posts here prove it, that you are here to smear him to draw attention away from what he exposed. "Attack the messenger, when you have something to hide" How quaint and amusingly pathetic.... But let's give you a little test: Why does the Swedish prosecutor insist that Assange come to Sweden for "questioning", when the charges are misdemeanors, not felonies? Even though CCTV interviews for misdemeanors has been accepted for years in Europe, why does the Swedish Prosecutor refuse to do that - even one conducted from the embassy itself? You are purposely omitting the fact that the charge of "rape" as defined by Swedish law in the charges brought against him, is not the same thing as rape as defined in the US. Further, why did the Swedish Prosecutor take the original prosecutor off the case when the first prosecutor could not find enough evidence to substantiate charges? And that was based upon, in both cases, of the women involved going as far as cooking breakfast for him the next morning and letting him stay, and not reporting a thing for at least 30 days? Now if you had included that fact in your smear, that would have blown your whole case out of the water. But that's what smear merchants do - tell just enough truth to make their case and hope no one catches them half lying.
Face it, folks, here we have a smear merchant who flings buzz words and innuendo, in hopes we have forgotten they flimsiness of the original charges against Assange, and the odd behavior of the Swedish prosecutor. All this proves is that Assange has hit a nerve with his released information.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):