Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(55,745 posts)
393. So what? What do you know, pintobean?
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 07:49 AM
Mar 2015

Going from your posts, I'm still waiting to learn something worth knowing.

Wonder what the radiation level of the ocean is over there? peacebird Mar 2015 #1
Could that be why my Akami burned my tongue recently? Helen Borg Mar 2015 #4
Was the tuna caught in those waters? Scootaloo Mar 2015 #10
I haven't eaten fish Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #19
Your decision not to eat is based on what? Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #108
I won't quote the official figure for the spike of radiation Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #182
Fish breathe from the atmosphere? Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #184
See the addenda in my post above. eom. Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #185
I read it. It makes no sense to me. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #189
From 2014: More radiation in some Oregon tuna following Fukushima Octafish Mar 2015 #337
Plutonium and cesium are not the same thing. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #339
Feel free to enjoy the sea's bounty. Octafish Mar 2015 #341
I had sushi last night! zappaman Mar 2015 #343
Live Long and Prosper. Octafish Mar 2015 #354
Back at ya! zappaman Mar 2015 #356
"Just going by history, that's the smart thing to do." NuclearDem Mar 2015 #344
Glad you understand, then. Octafish Mar 2015 #355
Understand what exactly? That Helen Caldicott is utterly untrustworthy? NuclearDem Mar 2015 #357
No, you are wrong on that. Caldicott has dedicated her life to healing. Octafish Mar 2015 #358
Her MD didn't stop her from falsely attributing a bogus study to the NYAS. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #360
There are more than 1,000 articles concerning Fukushima radiation in the scientific literature. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #342
Please do. News coverage of Fukushima disaster has minimized health risks to general population. Octafish Mar 2015 #346
I'm not posting 1200 articles. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #347
Content Analysis helps us understand the news coverage. Octafish Mar 2015 #351
If you encountered enough radioactive material in your food to burn your tongue on contact, AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #137
It's probably the wasabi FBaggins Mar 2015 #191
There was some greenish paste on the side... Helen Borg Mar 2015 #353
Might have bitten into a spent fuel rod. They can be warmish. Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #349
and let us remember - hopemountain Mar 2015 #61
Depending what you mean by "over there" a few hundred miles away its pretty low stevenleser Mar 2015 #216
Kick.... daleanime Mar 2015 #2
They still don't know where the core went bananas Mar 2015 #3
It's in the containment. Because unless it teleported away, it sure hasn't been found AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #138
It is not contained...Duh! RobertEarl Mar 2015 #139
I said the Core. Which is now corium. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #145
Intact? RobertEarl Mar 2015 #152
I said the catchment. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #154
There have been a number of steam events RobertEarl Mar 2015 #155
There was a plan, not too long back, to possibly dispose of radioactive waste by glomming it into a AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #159
That sounds like a fabulous plan! I hope they try it! delrem Mar 2015 #171
In all seriousness, France should decommission that ancient piece of crap. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #174
right on time LOL snooper2 Mar 2015 #192
Oh good, I've got a follower! delrem Mar 2015 #289
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Capt. Obvious Mar 2015 #250
Alert results Veilex Mar 2015 #251
Thanks to both of you RobertEarl Mar 2015 #255
So you conclude that since "they can't find it" it's has to be still in the containment? rhett o rick Mar 2015 #472
If it melted into the ground under the plant, even 20 feet, the radioactive steam plume would AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #475
I agree there is no proof that it's left the containment. I would like to find rhett o rick Mar 2015 #476
It is being cooled, actively. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #477
Some things to consider FBaggins Mar 2015 #478
A ridiculously disingenuous post FBaggins Mar 2015 #194
Another one for the reviled "conspiracy theorists"--IT's a Conspiracy (fact), not a theory! Demeter Mar 2015 #5
YEP. The gatekeepers have DU just the way they like it. Rex Mar 2015 #106
Snark and mockery are how you help transform an "underground" into a site.... villager Mar 2015 #115
It isn't even "one"... let alone "another one" FBaggins Mar 2015 #197
She also said half a million would die. Bonobo Mar 2015 #6
More than half a million if you count starfish. Orrex Mar 2015 #7
Immediately? n/t malaise Mar 2015 #8
Well, around 56 million people die every year... snooper2 Mar 2015 #195
That depends on how long you wait. uberblonde Mar 2015 #13
exactly mercuryblues Mar 2015 #21
Eventually. Cancer doesn't kill overnight. Hekate Mar 2015 #84
But half a million is still a ridiculous overestimate. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #128
You have a ridiculous underestimate RobertEarl Mar 2015 #144
On top of all that, Chernobyl turned me into a newt. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #149
It certainly ruined Xmas for the residents of a rather large region... Hekate Mar 2015 #156
There are some wonderful families in Scotland who Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #183
No doubt. Chernobyl too, was simply a minor error... LanternWaste Mar 2015 #270
Chernobyl was no minor error FBaggins Mar 2015 #274
Not what I said at all. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #275
Your math is off FBaggins Mar 2015 #277
Point taken. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #278
"Chernobyl was one reactor, Fukushima was at least three and numerous old fuel pools." AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #177
Horlicks! Absolute rubbish. Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #186
I'm trying to figure out what this is supposed to be an objection to. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #190
No. Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #335
Keep in mind that there's more to it than that... FBaggins Mar 2015 #211
This OP sure looks like it could be hers. pintobean Mar 2015 #9
Whut? lonestarnot Mar 2015 #29
! pintobean Mar 2015 #32
Heh. WilliamPitt Mar 2015 #50
Original Post pintobean Mar 2015 #56
pintobean... Rex Mar 2015 #95
Good catch, now he is backtracking like mad. Rex Mar 2015 #94
So nice of you to grace us with your brilliant observations. pintobean Mar 2015 #97
pintobean... Rex Mar 2015 #100
Why? Because she turned out to be right after all? PS: Not the same person. nt Hekate Mar 2015 #80
There is a jury out on this reply. PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #83
Jury is back. PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #85
Thanks. pintobean Mar 2015 #86
I was #2. Shitty alert. PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #88
I thought it was funny. pintobean Mar 2015 #89
He/she knows full well that sometimes juries are vindictive assholes and will hide because they PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #91
Oh yeah, the shot in the dark alert. pintobean Mar 2015 #92
I'm the alerter. You're a grave-dancing bully. truebrit71 Mar 2015 #122
Looks like we were spot on. pintobean Mar 2015 #124
Can you explain what you're going on about here? AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #147
Sincerely, are you talking about Nadin? She is still active, her last post was March 6th. freshwest Mar 2015 #173
It isn't grave dancing if she wasn't canned LOL...words mean stuff snooper2 Mar 2015 #202
Perhaps ''Bullying'' is a better word for what you are thinking of. Octafish Mar 2015 #394
As opposed to the stupid and spiteful post? truebrit71 Mar 2015 #120
Um, let's review: PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #127
This message was self-deleted by its author ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #196
The suspension came because you kept attacking DUers pintobean Mar 2015 #205
Indeed I did. Bully DUers, who apparently can't take what they dish out. Oh, and btw, I ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #206
I don't see anyone else whining pintobean Mar 2015 #208
It's clear you're my #1 fan. I wasn't back from suspension for 2 seconds before you ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #209
Ha. Bullshit pintobean Mar 2015 #210
Where did I say I was trying to bully you? Are you part of the crew I was referring to? Also, ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #213
Lol. Maybe you should re-read this sub-thread. pintobean Mar 2015 #214
There seem to be a LOT of people who think it's cool to cry bully while bullying themselves. PeaceNikki Mar 2015 #217
Yes the rationalization to blame the victim. Even if you are right and I don't rhett o rick Mar 2015 #294
Stupidest thing I've read all day...so far. nt ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #193
These pathetic TEPCO minions chervilant Mar 2015 #11
LOL! I think they know it will be hard.... Buzz Clik Mar 2015 #109
Um, no. Not in the slightest. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #150
Oh, goodie. chervilant Mar 2015 #175
Yeah, because your post 11 had none of that. Later. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #176
Well, which is it? NuclearDem Mar 2015 #187
Which is it?!? chervilant Mar 2015 #222
Woosh. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #266
Woosh? chervilant Mar 2015 #269
That was a bit unnecessary. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #272
nonsense G_j Mar 2015 #298
Bring nonsense to a discussion about real issues and science, NuclearDem Mar 2015 #300
I'll call it what is G_j Mar 2015 #303
I'm not claiming any authority. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #304
I"m betting Tepco will drag its feet until 2 generations later wordpix Mar 2015 #281
Have you seen the naysayers herein? chervilant Mar 2015 #292
Your posts are being "belittled" not because you're an anti-nuclear poster NuclearDem Mar 2015 #301
And do these supposed "clean up robots" currently exist? paleotn Mar 2015 #12
Well lets see, the article said "most likely by robots" so I lean towards "not yet". cstanleytech Mar 2015 #16
I might be wrong.... paleotn Mar 2015 #20
No idea on the time period it could be a year or it could be ten years from now cstanleytech Mar 2015 #55
A good robot alfredo Mar 2015 #51
Ha! Hey, kamichi...whatever your name is...We've got a job for you. (nt) paleotn Mar 2015 #77
Retirement package? alfredo Mar 2015 #111
An 'octopus' robot with eight limbs developed to clear rubble in Fukushima, Japan herding cats Mar 2015 #90
and who will clean up robots & where will the radioactive materials go? wordpix Mar 2015 #282
We could just toss it into the ocean and forget it like we used to do Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #285
I think we're a long way from knowing... NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #14
once again we had the story here first. mopinko Mar 2015 #15
Ditto malaise Mar 2015 #18
Yes, and a great DUer elleng Mar 2015 #35
K&R! marym625 Mar 2015 #17
Yep. Thanks for this n/t Holly_Hobby Mar 2015 #22
As I recall, the debate was whether or not the core melted THROUGH the containment vessel NickB79 Mar 2015 #23
No, the idiot pro-nukes kept claiming a meltdown was impossible, even after it already happened. bananas Mar 2015 #28
I was referring to the debates here on DU, between DU posters NickB79 Mar 2015 #54
HYDROVOLCANIC EXPLOSIONS! AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #133
Can you back that up? FBaggins Mar 2015 #215
That member can't reply due to a hidden post. /nt pintobean Mar 2015 #218
Hadn't gotten down to that... oh well. FBaggins Mar 2015 #224
That excerpt sounds like a hopeful guess to me. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #53
TEPCO admitted there was a meltdown as early as May 2011 FLPanhandle Mar 2015 #24
Minor detail. pintobean Mar 2015 #25
In other words, no cover up, and Nadin was repeating readily available information stevenleser Mar 2015 #198
It was long before that FBaggins Mar 2015 #221
Unfortunately, those that really need to take this in and internalize it will not do so. stevenleser Mar 2015 #241
Many now conflate facts with official propaganda from industry and the state entities TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #26
Propaganda is the only thing the nuclear energy industry has and it's very Cleita Mar 2015 #27
I'm astonished at the reckless propaganda and spin. bananas Mar 2015 #31
Couldn't say it better malaise Mar 2015 #180
Right. The denier's try to bully discussions but screeming conspiracy theory rhett o rick Mar 2015 #474
That will be great for her ego treestar Mar 2015 #30
Why are you so into her ego? lonestarnot Mar 2015 #33
lol treestar Mar 2015 #36
And you are dissatisfied that the possibility that she may have been correct may create a large ego? lonestarnot Mar 2015 #39
She had that already. treestar Mar 2015 #76
See #24. She was repeating readily available information that was not covered up. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #199
So for that she was banned or whatthefuckever? lonestarnot Mar 2015 #309
She was in no sense banned FBaggins Mar 2015 #316
So in your response you refer to a ball, she had 1 ball, but it wasn't hers, so what the fuck is lonestarnot Mar 2015 #364
Was the analogy really that difficult to understand? FBaggins Mar 2015 #369
She's not banned. She posted as recently as a few weeks ago. stevenleser Mar 2015 #329
As a yellow fucking dog democratic, some refer to me as my way or the highway here, and lock or mock lonestarnot Mar 2015 #365
It will be awful for the turdblossoms who attacked her! bananas Mar 2015 #34
I don't think she was bullied. treestar Mar 2015 #37
I was not close to her, and I have no allegiances to anyone in this ridiculous battle... ScreamingMeemie Mar 2015 #38
I agree, maybe with the exceptions pintobean Mar 2015 #47
And yet you befriend him on DI. Lol. darkangel218 Mar 2015 #58
That's total bullshit. pintobean Mar 2015 #62
Is it?? darkangel218 Mar 2015 #64
And lets forget for a moment about how other posters treated her. darkangel218 Mar 2015 #67
Oh shit! Tell me you are being sarcastic. Rex Mar 2015 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Mar 2015 #107
LOL! And you were soooo nice to her too! Rex Mar 2015 #98
! pintobean Mar 2015 #102
So you are skinner now!?! Rex Mar 2015 #103
Somebody had a little boo-boo pintobean Mar 2015 #132
agreed G_j Mar 2015 #57
She could be pretty acidic herself treestar Mar 2015 #73
"So her crying bully seemed to be a bit of a posture"?? darkangel218 Mar 2015 #78
I agree. bravenak Mar 2015 #87
The notebook keepers are really creepy, keeping tabs on posters and then pulling out links ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #461
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #41
I agree with you . nt cwydro Mar 2015 #46
She was mercilessly bullied. Cleita Mar 2015 #49
+1 darkangel218 Mar 2015 #59
Most, if not all, of the bullies are right here in this thread, doing their thang and ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #463
Now they are all in one place. Cleita Mar 2015 #465
She absolutely was bullied. cui bono Mar 2015 #140
There was way more than "push-back". Ridicule and mockery rhett o rick Mar 2015 #161
She was a bully herself treestar Mar 2015 #170
Exactly. We live in a bully culture. It's everywhere and there is always the justification rhett o rick Mar 2015 #231
She did earn some mockery treestar Mar 2015 #324
The is a message board for "politically liberal" posters. "Wild claims", IMO, are not only rhett o rick Mar 2015 #330
Given the facts and link of post #24 above, criticism seems warranted. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #200
Of course disagreements are appropriate, and maybe criticism of someone's stand on an issue, rhett o rick Mar 2015 #232
"It's never appropriate to gang up on someone and ridicule them" - Define that for me... stevenleser Mar 2015 #240
"Is it OK to gang up on and ridicule someone if they post racism or homophobia or sexism? " rhett o rick Mar 2015 #259
Oh she was bullied. Every damn post of hers was sent to the hosts forum Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #179
And they're all right here in this thread, attracted no doubt by the sweet ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #464
She ruined their fun when she stopped posting. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #473
What exactly was she right about anyway? FLPanhandle Mar 2015 #44
It's not bullying to say 'you're wrong' when you're wrong, or 'you're blowing this out of proportion AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #134
This. Brickbat Mar 2015 #136
Well of course not. No one said it was. Typical strawman argument. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #295
It's not a strawman. That is what happened. People disagreed with her and her interpretations. stevenleser Mar 2015 #296
I guess you think that rationalization is the key to happiness. Many of us saw what happened. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #299
Nope. My opinion is backed up by the person who can see all posts/alerts/etc. stevenleser Mar 2015 #302
Good grief. "My opinion is backed up by the person who can see all posts/alerts/etc." rhett o rick Mar 2015 #306
"God or Skinner" Lol. FBaggins Mar 2015 #312
Yep. You didn't read all the posts under this OP, did ya? stevenleser Mar 2015 #328
And you see that as vindication for her treatment. You missed the point by a mile. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #331
See posts #305, #310 and my #332 below nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #333
I've never seen you defend anyone else. pintobean Mar 2015 #336
Your post insinuates that you've been in all the threads that include rhett o rick Mar 2015 #359
That is my "thing" with these things. Like the continuation of "used car salesman" stuff. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2015 #297
If a female wears a mini-skirt and goes into a bar in a bad neighborhood and gets harassed, rhett o rick Mar 2015 #307
That's a nonsensical and false analogy FBaggins Mar 2015 #314
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #96
To be fair it was rouge wind turbines LordGlenconner Mar 2015 #220
That one was pretty strange. treestar Mar 2015 #325
nadin said lots of things about Fukushima... SidDithers Mar 2015 #40
Bully apologists defend their bullying. bananas Mar 2015 #42
horsehockey... ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2015 #113
Thanks for bringing honest, evidence based perspective to this topic and to DU. HuckleB Mar 2015 #43
+1 n/t tammywammy Mar 2015 #48
You can't say that unless you are an expert on how the nuclear energy Cleita Mar 2015 #68
I doubt "Nadin of Arc" is an expert either LordGlenconner Mar 2015 #219
Nadin lives close to the Onofre nuclear plant which fortunately has been Cleita Mar 2015 #223
And I live close to an area with many earthquakes LordGlenconner Mar 2015 #225
How on earth did that make sense to you? FBaggins Mar 2015 #228
Excuse me, but... Cleita Mar 2015 #230
Sorry... I can't do that. FBaggins Mar 2015 #234
I don't bother to address people who have their minds already made up and that Cleita Mar 2015 #239
How ironic FBaggins Mar 2015 #256
I don't have to be a seismologist because there are seismologists already on the Cleita Mar 2015 #261
What an incredibly deceptive hatchet job of a video. FBaggins Mar 2015 #264
Sure. Cleita Mar 2015 #265
Thank you for proving my point FBaggins Mar 2015 #271
No. Thank you for proving my point that none of you Nuke jocks are interested in Cleita Mar 2015 #273
Sorry... we may never know FBaggins Mar 2015 #276
"Nuje jocks" LordGlenconner Mar 2015 #290
Never mind. Mobile device changes the spelling of words, but you know what I mean. Cleita Mar 2015 #293
you should educate yourself - start here with Nuclear Roulette wordpix Mar 2015 #284
What an interesting spelling error FBaggins Mar 2015 #286
I know, FB, reading is such a chore, especially when it comes with footnotes wordpix Mar 2015 #457
The footnotes are actually the funniest part FBaggins Mar 2015 #459
+1000 wordpix Mar 2015 #283
I live near a Ford automotive manufacturing facility... SidDithers Mar 2015 #235
I live within 30 miles of San Onofre! zappaman Mar 2015 #242
Of course not because you don't care to learn about it. Cleita Mar 2015 #243
Oh noes! zappaman Mar 2015 #246
If you're such an authority on San Onofre, perhaps you can refute this: Brother Buzz Mar 2015 #248
Yes it was all removed and placed into starfish breeding grounds. zappaman Mar 2015 #252
I live relatively close to Three Mile Island treestar Mar 2015 #326
Then you should be concerned. Cleita Mar 2015 #345
Sid... Rex Mar 2015 #105
Sid said lots of things about Fukushima RobertEarl Mar 2015 #114
Speaking of being wrong on Fukushima. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #126
Yes, you too, wrong RobertEarl Mar 2015 #130
this coming from somebody who said the ocean is "dead" snooper2 Mar 2015 #204
Now he's claiming to be an auto mechanic in mocking me. Cleita Mar 2015 #244
And some people say lots of nothing in a vast majority of their posts. n/t cui bono Mar 2015 #168
And if you see post #24 above, crediting her with getting this "right" is laughable. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #201
Yes she was, mostly RobertEarl Mar 2015 #45
+1 darkangel218 Mar 2015 #60
Everybody RELAX! bvar22 Mar 2015 #52
Same people now pat themselves on the back saying that she was not bullied, or only one certain darkangel218 Mar 2015 #63
I noticed. bvar22 Mar 2015 #66
That's how it works here now... PCIntern Mar 2015 #69
Couldnt agree with you more. thank you. nt darkangel218 Mar 2015 #70
The DU RW corporate strawman motto: "To Deflect and Pretend". nt Zorra Mar 2015 #74
The empirical evidence will silence them all eventually malaise Mar 2015 #79
"well, they admitted it, therefore there can be no coverups because they inevitably fail" MisterP Mar 2015 #65
But they are trying. It is illegal to report anything related to it without government approval. newthinking Mar 2015 #71
I am glad to see others express their observations that Nadin was bullied G_j Mar 2015 #72
She was bullied malaise Mar 2015 #75
such a shame G_j Mar 2015 #82
+1,000 malaise Mar 2015 #93
Really, ok, link to the WORST example of someone bullying her. nt Logical Mar 2015 #116
Nope, thats not our job. Agschmid Mar 2015 #160
Thanks, Malaise. Hekate Mar 2015 #81
Hear Hear!!! PCIntern Mar 2015 #112
Cheers libodem Mar 2015 #279
K&R!! SixString Mar 2015 #99
I see her fan club is hard at work, seems some are missing. Rex Mar 2015 #104
Indeed malaise Mar 2015 #118
Everone knew they melted in march 2011. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #135
I never doubted nadinbrzezinski blackspade Mar 2015 #110
And yet, here we are in Dec 2011, talking about how TEPCO stated all the fuel melted from AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #142
Not sure why you are replying to me. blackspade Mar 2015 #237
Where's the coverup? AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #247
And that is were we differ on this particular issue, a narrow focus. blackspade Mar 2015 #253
The cost is the primary problem. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #257
I don't have any dogs in this fight... mike_c Mar 2015 #117
wild supposition? RobertEarl Mar 2015 #129
It's not as if nadin was the only one saying it. All you had to do was read/listen to some real cui bono Mar 2015 #148
You mean like CNN? AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #163
Well there you go. Even better. n/t cui bono Mar 2015 #167
This is what I have been arguing regarding Iraq and WMD as it pertains to Democrats who voted stevenleser Mar 2015 #207
There was even doubt within the Bush administration about WMDs G_j Mar 2015 #263
as for Iraq G_j Mar 2015 #254
I am fortunate to have a back-channel to Nadin. DemoTex Mar 2015 #119
Stay safe and remember to post some more of your magnificent photos malaise Mar 2015 #121
Could you ask her for her blog contact for Phlem? Phlem Mar 2015 #125
. Agschmid Mar 2015 #158
yea Phlem Mar 2015 #172
Thank You. Phlem Mar 2015 #141
She's still around isn't she? Phlem Mar 2015 #123
yet again. n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2015 #131
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2015 #143
I HATE that she was FORCED to go away and NEVER posts any more! OilemFirchen Mar 2015 #146
Hehe... SidDithers Mar 2015 #151
SID, don't ever leave DU, please! RobertEarl Mar 2015 #153
LOL, a global coverup... PosterChild Mar 2015 #157
You did well RobertEarl Mar 2015 #164
Well, they have time machines, so, how are you going to fight that? AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #169
Then again.... PosterChild Apr 2015 #480
And here's TEPCO admitting that in June 2011. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #162
Strangest strategy for a coverup ever. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #165
It's like they hid it in plain sight. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #166
This story is so important marym625 Mar 2015 #178
See post #24. It was reported right away. Nadin didn't reveal any new info. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #203
For once I see some sense in Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #181
Two points, first, see #24. No cover up in terms of melt down. Second, there is an answer to stevenleser Mar 2015 #212
On balance, I would prefer people to believe you. But it's a terrible dilemma. Joe Chi Minh Mar 2015 #334
Nothing to see here. Move on. I mean, ''Muon.'' Octafish Mar 2015 #188
nadinbrzezinski CountAllVotes Mar 2015 #226
I miss her too. calimary Mar 2015 #308
Some of them ("folks who don't want you to know") chervilant Mar 2015 #227
You really can't tell the difference between a reactor and a nuclear bomb? FBaggins Mar 2015 #229
Wow... chervilant Mar 2015 #233
Then what on earth was the point of your story about nuclear testing? NuclearDem Mar 2015 #236
My guess is the poster didn't know the difference LordGlenconner Mar 2015 #291
Paranoia much? FBaggins Mar 2015 #238
I'm old enough to remember that. They told lies at the expense of Cleita Mar 2015 #245
Top Secret Turds Octafish Mar 2015 #249
Thanks for that link. chervilant Mar 2015 #262
Absolutely, that is Top Secret Turds II Octafish Mar 2015 #268
Yep malaise Mar 2015 #267
I miss Nadine Gothmog Mar 2015 #258
In other news, Android3.14 Mar 2015 #260
"previous asumptions of a meltdown"---really???? Tepco was proclaiming no meltdown wordpix Mar 2015 #280
Nope... they most certainly were not. FBaggins Mar 2015 #288
TEPCO didn't admit any meltdowns until May, two months after the fact. Octafish Mar 2015 #321
TEPCO and the Japanese government said a meltdown was likely two days after the event. stevenleser Mar 2015 #338
Don't worry. By then, TEPCO's credibility was already shot. Octafish Mar 2015 #340
No, it wasn't. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #366
Fukushima: They Knew Octafish Mar 2015 #374
Sorry Octa, it's your credibility that is "shot" in this case. FBaggins Mar 2015 #370
It's what TEPCO said, FBaggins. ''It is not a health risk to humans.'' Octafish Mar 2015 #375
It most certainly is NOT what they said. FBaggins Mar 2015 #433
It's what TEPCO said, FBaggins. ''It is not a health risk to humans.'' Octafish Mar 2015 #435
"Just because you say so, even if you use CAPS, doesn't change what TEPCO said." FBaggins Mar 2015 #437
What did I make up? It's what TEPCO said. I even gave you a link to CNN. Octafish Mar 2015 #441
The link you provided refutes your story. FBaggins Mar 2015 #445
Let's see how others read that pronoun FBaggins Mar 2015 #447
Others? That's what I posted. Octafish Mar 2015 #452
Yep. We've got posts with links with proof. Doesn't matter. That person will never admit they are stevenleser Mar 2015 #379
Show where 'that person' is wrong, stevenleser. Octafish Mar 2015 #381
"and show where I'm wrong. I'll admit it." NuclearDem Mar 2015 #382
Absolutely nailed it... SidDithers Mar 2015 #383
''Be ready for the inevitable alert.'' That's the mark of a shitheel, SidDithers of DU. Octafish Mar 2015 #386
I didn't say that you'd alert, octafish of DU... SidDithers Mar 2015 #389
Show where I've done that, otherwise it's just a smear, SidDithers of DU. Octafish Mar 2015 #390
You don't know half as much as you think you do. pintobean Mar 2015 #391
So what? What do you know, pintobean? Octafish Mar 2015 #393
So what if I write about things you don't like? Show where I'm wrong. Octafish Mar 2015 #384
You've had those examples presented to you constantly. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #385
Seeing how you fail to actually show any of that, I want this to be in the record... Octafish Mar 2015 #387
"nothing but a smear." NuclearDem Mar 2015 #388
So you can't show where I'm a racist or an anti-Semite. Octafish Mar 2015 #392
So you're saying you've never linked to Roberts' or Bollyn's own websites? NuclearDem Mar 2015 #399
So, you don't have a case, NuclearDem. Octafish Mar 2015 #403
So, you can't show where I wrote any of that, NuclearDem. Octafish Mar 2015 #397
Just to be fucking clear, here... SidDithers Mar 2015 #395
Don't get mad, SidDithers. Octafish Mar 2015 #396
Answer my questions, and I'll show you... SidDithers Mar 2015 #398
Here you go, SidDithers of DU. Octafish Mar 2015 #401
Figures... SidDithers Mar 2015 #409
I notice you're goading me on by repeating the same falsehoods, SidDithers of DU. Octafish Mar 2015 #410
What's the falsehood, octafish of DU?... SidDithers Mar 2015 #412
Keep repeating that, SidDithers of DU. It doesn't change your smear. Octafish Mar 2015 #415
Keep dodging, Octafish of DU... SidDithers Mar 2015 #417
Show where I ''promote anti-Semitic, or homophobic, or racist writers at DU.'' Octafish Mar 2015 #419
Oh FFS... SidDithers Mar 2015 #420
Roll your eyes, too, for added effect. Octafish Mar 2015 #421
Still dodging... SidDithers Mar 2015 #423
You wrote I promoted them, which is not true, SidDithers of DU. Octafish Mar 2015 #424
You're absolutely promoting and legitimizing them... SidDithers Mar 2015 #425
That is not true, SidDithers of DU. Why do you continue to repeat it? Octafish Mar 2015 #426
It is true, octafish. Why do you continue to deny it?... SidDithers Mar 2015 #427
Poor you. I own what I post. What do you own? Octafish Mar 2015 #431
you "own" what you post? zappaman Mar 2015 #432
Tag Team is so second banana, zappaman. Octafish Mar 2015 #434
Yes, I knew you would not own your use of anti-Semites and homophobes. zappaman Mar 2015 #458
It's absolutely amazing that he denies promoting these writers... SidDithers Mar 2015 #438
He's okay with posting them as long as they back up whatever theory he's promoting. tammywammy Mar 2015 #442
How'd you find this subthread? Octafish Mar 2015 #453
It's an open public discussion board. tammywammy Mar 2015 #460
Thanks! That's logical. Octafish Mar 2015 #462
''Link after link,'' as in your link saying the same thing. Octafish Mar 2015 #479
You misunderstand what "own" means in this context FBaggins Mar 2015 #439
Obviously, you don't own it... SidDithers Mar 2015 #436
It seems at least three other people beat me to it. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #402
So what? Tag Team. Octafish Mar 2015 #404
I've three out of the four. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #405
Remind me where you've contributed anything on this thread about Fukushima. Octafish Mar 2015 #407
Neither have you. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #411
Disagree. While I've spent a lot of time defending myself from your baseless accusations... Octafish Mar 2015 #413
Tag team? I'm not allowed to sleep, and if I do, and someone else answers, it's a "tag team"? stevenleser Mar 2015 #406
Right...''imaginary bullying.'' Octafish Mar 2015 #408
I'm losing track of the discussion you have changed the subject and moved the goalposts so many stevenleser Mar 2015 #414
You accused me, ''that person'' as one who never admits being wrong. Octafish Mar 2015 #416
Correct. You don't admit it. You fall back to accusations of bullying/tag teaming or you change the stevenleser Mar 2015 #418
If that were true, there'd be no need to get personal. Octafish Mar 2015 #422
Why don't you instead show us where you HAVE admitted to being wrong? FBaggins Mar 2015 #440
Do you have an example? Octafish Mar 2015 #444
I've given you several. FBaggins Mar 2015 #446
Where you failed to comprehend TEPCO said PLUTONIUM ''is not a health risk to humans''? Octafish Mar 2015 #448
That one proves you wrong as well. FBaggins Mar 2015 #450
No need to be insulting. You forgot the link. Octafish Mar 2015 #454
That wasn't insulting, it was giving you the benefit of the doubt FBaggins Mar 2015 #455
Here's an easy one FBaggins Mar 2015 #449
Another easy one FBaggins Mar 2015 #466
I miss Nadine and hear from her from time to time. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #287
This thread, and it's 186 recs, is the saddest thing I've ever seen on DU tkmorris Mar 2015 #305
Jay Polk, Michelle's dress, Maddow's reporting pintobean Mar 2015 #310
Jury results: joshcryer Mar 2015 #313
What an odd alert FBaggins Mar 2015 #315
I guess the alerter was hoping for pintobean Mar 2015 #317
I got called a "motherfucker" in the alert on my post... SidDithers Mar 2015 #320
I'd rather be a "motherfucker" pintobean Mar 2015 #322
Jay Polk. A classic. Brickbat Mar 2015 #319
I didn't have a problem with them. joshcryer Mar 2015 #311
+1. LOL n/t FSogol Mar 2015 #318
+1 thank you treestar Mar 2015 #323
I got put on the "iggy" list during the 60cm = 1 meter kerfuffle. tammywammy Mar 2015 #327
I wish it were more uncommon that nonsense is celebrated here by a certain group. stevenleser Mar 2015 #332
You are trying to prove she deserved being bullied. Really? Granted a large number rhett o rick Mar 2015 #348
No, that is your strawman. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #350
Strawman? Let's look at what you said. rhett o rick Mar 2015 #361
I know what I said. And it is not what you said that I said. nt stevenleser Mar 2015 #363
This message was self-deleted by its author pintobean Mar 2015 #352
Precisely malaise Mar 2015 #368
Ah... I think I "get it" now FBaggins Mar 2015 #371
I am fully aware of what "bullying" is and a number of other posters have commented on the rhett o rick Mar 2015 #373
Correct. "Bullying" to them means a lot of people disagreeing with them or one of their friends. stevenleser Mar 2015 #378
Talk about the thread that never ends. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #362
I opened this thread hoping to see a response by Nadine Gothmog Mar 2015 #380
I talked to Nadine the other day. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #400
Thanks Gothmog Mar 2015 #428
I don't see her coming back. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #429
I am in touch with her too and I agree. nt ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #467
I am glad she is doing well and pursuing her career and hobbies with vivigor. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #468
Me too, hrmjustin :) nt ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #469
Mega Thread and I still don't see what she was so right about...? Bonobo Mar 2015 #367
Nor will you FBaggins Mar 2015 #372
You were never worth the trouble to research, Baggins. leveymg Mar 2015 #376
Some people apparently don't think that their credibility is worth it either FBaggins Mar 2015 #443
It appears I was mostly right about what was happening, Baggins, and you got it wrong. leveymg Mar 2015 #470
Your memory is lousy FBaggins Mar 2015 #471
You can't see it, and you can't smell it either JEB Mar 2015 #377
. randome Mar 2015 #430
nadinbrzezinski has been right about a lot of things. Jamastiene Mar 2015 #451
True... and some of them were even about Fukushima FBaggins Mar 2015 #456
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So it turns out that nad...»Reply #393