Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. It's a huge change. And I haven't seen one prominent
Thu May 10, 2012, 08:44 AM
May 2012

GLBT leader say anything to the contrary. Yes, he said leave it up to the states but he knows this will be settled in the courts and I believe that when the time comes, if re-elected, he'll have the opportunity to appoint pro-equality judges and justices. Does he need to "evolve" further? Yes, of course. But his impulse is toward equality.

However, having said that, I believe this position could lose him the election. No matter what happens, I support his declaration of support and wouldn't have it any other way (except his further "evolving", but there is one important state that I believe he'll lose because of it: Florida. Why? Because Florida has a very large percentage of elderly voters, and we KNOW that elderly voters are the most likely to disapprove of marriage equality. In most states, his support of ME won't make a difference, but there, I'll venture that it will.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama sent this...»Reply #3