Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)HuffPost: Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department [View all]
HuffPost link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/26/clinton-foundation-donors_0_n_7441486.html
David J. Sirota is an American political commentator and radio host based in Denver. He is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, Democratic political spokesperson, and blogger.
Full story is from International Business Times:
Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department
By David Sirota @davidsirota d.sirota@ibtimes.com, Andrew Perez @AndrewPerezDC andrew.perez@ibtimes.com on May 26 2015 8:44 AM EDT

Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments had given millions to the Clinton Foundation. Yana Paskova/Getty Images
Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East.
Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region's fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Departments documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.
But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clintons State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At a press conference in Washington to announce the departments approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been a top priority for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.
These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.
http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
By David Sirota @davidsirota d.sirota@ibtimes.com, Andrew Perez @AndrewPerezDC andrew.perez@ibtimes.com on May 26 2015 8:44 AM EDT

Under Hillary Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments had given millions to the Clinton Foundation. Yana Paskova/Getty Images
Even by the standards of arms deals between the United States and Saudi Arabia, this one was enormous. A consortium of American defense contractors led by Boeing would deliver $29 billion worth of advanced fighter jets to the United States' oil-rich ally in the Middle East.
Israeli officials were agitated, reportedly complaining to the Obama administration that this substantial enhancement to Saudi air power risked disrupting the region's fragile balance of power. The deal appeared to collide with the State Departments documented concerns about the repressive policies of the Saudi royal family.
But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clintons State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At a press conference in Washington to announce the departments approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been a top priority for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.
These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.
http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187
David J. Sirota is an American political commentator and radio host based in Denver. He is a nationally syndicated newspaper columnist, Democratic political spokesperson, and blogger.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

HuffPost: Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department [View all]
NYC_SKP
May 2015
OP
So, the argument by inference is that Clinton isn't influenced by pro-Israel donors and lobbyists.
geek tragedy
May 2015
#3
Do you think that President Obama was left in the dark about this decision?
geek tragedy
May 2015
#8
Clinton Foundation reported that it "violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration"
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#9
No, Reagan did it for ideological reasons, not to raise funds for himself, his family, or foundation
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#63
I agree and we can do better with Sen Sanders. No quid pro quo to worry about. nm
rhett o rick
May 2015
#24
If this turns out to be even remotely true then the Republicans have their attack ads
BrotherIvan
May 2015
#12
Yup, it will be nonstop drama, this is why we need to bail NOW. OBTW, Bernie launches today.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#13
Political Tactic? Get the "Dirt Out There Early" and it will DIE before Election Time?
KoKo
May 2015
#83
She could (and did) by not abiding by the disclosure agreement she had with the White House.
AtomicKitten
May 2015
#70
This is Amurika. EVERYONE gets weapons deals, whether they want them or not. n/t
Orsino
May 2015
#15
Yep. If this is considered corruption then all American politicians are beyond corrupt....more nothing.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#36
Non-scandal. Again. How many now, I lost count. Republicans must be loving the divide, the conquer part comes later.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#40
You could have posted word for word the same thing for each of the last 12 weeks of assorted "scandals".... and it would be as
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#44
This type of thing is the *reason* people support Sanders over Clinton in the first place
Fumesucker
May 2015
#45
Sanders may want to set one up, many poor folks around the world have been helped by Clinton
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#51
RW sites. Judicial Watch is pure Fox-like propaganda. Perhaps you have credible sources?
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#59
No. I read that part just after the speculation with no evidence began. Got evidence?
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#75
Chapter 3: "The Audacity of Something for Something." Continuing saga Hillary & Bill Clinton Show.
AtomicKitten
May 2015
#18
The difference in this case is the way that suddenly speaking fees were being paid to both Clintons,
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#23
...! "AutoPilot or Quid Pro Quo." And those are questions that need to be asked & answered..
KoKo
May 2015
#65
Aiding and abetting and in cahoots with the perpetrators/financiers of 9/11 with 3000 dead
ChisolmTrailDem
May 2015
#20
Name another US Secretary of State who has personally profited from the work they did in office.
NYC_SKP
May 2015
#35
White hat/black hat. Red camp, blue camp. Pick a camp and a hat, fling some crap? No thanks.
Fred Sanders
May 2015
#52
Are you in favor of "Forever War and Interventions" we Pay for with our Tax Dollars?
KoKo
May 2015
#67