General Discussion

steve2470

(37,461 posts)

828. That's a shame he said that

Thu Jun 4, 2015, 06:24 PM

Jun 2015

Of course I didn't agree with him on a few things (guns, Hillary), but he was a good guy and a good guy to me. He stuck up for me once (not that I ever need it) and I always remembered that.

Since he was here for so long and made good contributions, I'd like to see him be able to make a sincere apology in GD and be reinstated.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1084 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYC_SKP has been banned [View all] cyberswede Jun 2015 OP

Thank you Earl G. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #1

Guess I can take him off my ignore list. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #437

Me too. old guy Jun 2015 #734

Of course. And then that one will be Ignored & Trashed too. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #748

That was nasty, rude over the top inappropriate, imo. . 2banon Jun 2015 #868

Like SKP's misogynistic slur? Cha Jun 2015 #1017

It wasn't his slur. HERE'S WHAT WAS REALLY SAID IN HIS EXCHANGE WITH A TROLL leveymg Jun 2015 #1057

SKP owns it.. Proudly put it in his journal too. Cha Jun 2015 #1071

Which clearly shows that the term wasn't applied to ANY person, including Hillary. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1076

Which clearly show it was Directed right at Hillary Clinton. You're not helping SKP by denying it Cha Jun 2015 #1077

It does nothing of the sort. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1078

Yes it does..and, there's another set of spinners whining because he got banned bc it was directed Cha Jun 2015 #1079

Nice, detailed, rigorous defense of your point. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1080

Sorry, your defense won't work with the Admins. Doubt very much if SKP uses it. He wouldn't want to Cha Jun 2015 #1081

It wasn't intended as a defense of Skip's ill-considered post. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1082

DU is really weird these days, too much nastiness and rudeness. It isn't good or necessary. uppityperson Jun 2015 #2

Agreed Sherman A1 Jun 2015 #4

As much as I enjoyed my couple of stints on MIRT TBF Jun 2015 #259

We all had a common enemy. calimary Jun 2015 #540

Thoughtful post - TBF Jun 2015 #640

I'm an Eisenhower baby. I remember vague stuff about the Kennedys, mainly calimary Jun 2015 #821

A very good post. stage left Jun 2015 #763

We still have a common enemy, the Oligarchy. That includes Goldman-Sachs and the Wall Street rhett o rick Jun 2015 #880

And the name of their game is Divide and Conquer and that is what the oligarchs are doing here Dont call me Shirley Jun 2015 #1024

true heaven05 Jun 2015 #889

It was. Hissyspit Jun 2015 #731

You are absolutely right. 7962 Jun 2015 #284

they didn't ban members who outed roguevalley Jun 2015 #846

Holy crap THAT happened?? Wow. 7962 Jun 2015 #906

... TorchTheWitch Jun 2015 #1049

thank you, TorchTheWitch. I am STILL reeling over it and the roguevalley Jun 2015 #1066

Don't know why Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #511

This is a pillow fight VS 2008 krawhitham Jun 2015 #592

THAT is the analogy i was looking for! Joe the Revelator Jun 2015 #793

Not just weird, but downright creepy. KMOD Jun 2015 #625

That's a shame, but ultimately necessery Cali_Democrat Jun 2015 #3

Shame n2doc Jun 2015 #5

decent guy until he went completely off the rails. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #6

He's been teetering on the edge of my ignore list for months Warpy Jun 2015 #636

I just called him out a few weeks ago on the increasing weirdness of his posts that were, of course, Number23 Jun 2015 #799

Then why doesn't he have more hidden posts? The guy had no hidden posts for the past 90 days. Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1029

Jury system sucks. People who are popular enough geek tragedy Jun 2015 #1033

I agree with you that the jury system sucks however, I have seen people post jury results on alerted Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1034

This is one if the many problems with rule by jury geek tragedy Jun 2015 #1042

No one dropped the C-Bomb however, clear was the implication and given the context, after reviewing Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1043

decent guy my foot. trueblue2007 Jun 2015 #1067

This is a shame. He was a hero and leader to many here. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #7

yeah, the post totally should have been hidden 7-0, but geek tragedy Jun 2015 #10

We are all human... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #22

Obviously. I'd never call Sarah Palin or Phyllis Schlafly that. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #33

Idiots, cretins, miscreants. yahoos, reprobates, goobers, but not the C word. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #52

Assholes is good. Not hard at all to stay away from sexist or racist slurs if you respect others.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #74

What host are you referring to? marym625 Jun 2015 #685

It's all bullshit, he didn't call her the c-word, not even close Dragonfli Jun 2015 #801

looks to me like he was mocking the tombstone poster marym625 Jun 2015 #876

I googled the words as exactly as he posted it... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #899

This is a bit shocking to me... yuiyoshida Jun 2015 #973

While I Cannot Disagree. . . ProfessorGAC Jun 2015 #186

He's been insulting DUers for a long time now. MADem Jun 2015 #250

Lesson is even when your posts survive a jury, the admins can still see the alerts wyldwolf Jun 2015 #847

True...the alerts, and DUer's reactions as jurors to the MADem Jun 2015 #905

I doubt it was just that one post BainsBane Jun 2015 #771

Part of it is that there's practically no one who's saying "he couldn't have meant geek tragedy Jun 2015 #776

He hated Clinton, no question BainsBane Jun 2015 #782

he had also tried to blame the Charlie Hebdo victims by insisting that those geek tragedy Jun 2015 #787

Great post DSB MissDeeds Jun 2015 #193

I feel bad for SKP DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #218

I wondered too about impulse control MissDeeds Jun 2015 #244

I posted a thread in reference to that blm Jun 2015 #401

Curious lark Jun 2015 #265

I'm not God but I would have given him a thirty day timeout, long enough to miss the place. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #302

I think the bans already been lifted lark Jun 2015 #330

What makes you think the ban has been lifted? I would be happy if it has been. madfloridian Jun 2015 #527

No it hasn't. Posting privileges still revoked. nt City Lights Jun 2015 #613

For a person on for 7 year, can't a 30 day suspension work? yeoman6987 Jun 2015 #440

He never used that word, never called her that, it's all made up nasty shit to ban a critic. /nt Dragonfli Jun 2015 #804

Come on BainsBane Jun 2015 #832

I honestly don't see it, I see word twisting to achieve a goal Dragonfli Jun 2015 #840

I am against the ongoing movement here to label individual words as "inappropriate".... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2015 #927

EarlG is the one who translated it BainsBane Jun 2015 #971

Bull fucking shit. And nobody ever called Mrs. Clinton a name when they passed this Photo shop around in 2008 Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2015 #980

Here's how I see it... context is everything and I could be a thousand miles off base here. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #855

I think when some saw "cunning stunt" awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #862

I'm late to the issue, but my reading of it was the same. ladyVet Jun 2015 #1069

I didn't know it when I posted awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #1072

He got banned for THAT? hifiguy Jun 2015 #890

I think the usage of the pronoun is key Horse with no Name Jun 2015 #1039

BINGO !!! Hoppy Jun 2015 #298

I agree so much. I've been a fan since I first joined DU. I think it's unfortunate RKP5637 Jun 2015 #242

agreed samsingh Jun 2015 #328

Well said! n/t marym625 Jun 2015 #717

This is true. He was one of my favorite DUers. hifiguy Jun 2015 #886

Oh wow. Way the hell over the top. Autumn Jun 2015 #8

Both his post and the banning... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #863

Primary time is always the worst times of DU. Coventina Jun 2015 #9

It sure is. I'm utterly stunned by the nastiness here... n/t Adrahil Jun 2015 #56

NYC_SKP used to be a mod on DU2. He will be missed. I hope the admins give him another chance. L0oniX Jun 2015 #11

He's had a rough couple of years. Three complicated surgeries... KoKo Jun 2015 #45

He joked that it was a tongue twister. He was definitely referencing that word. n/t Adrahil Jun 2015 #61

Now even referencing a word will get you banned? zeemike Jun 2015 #581

Please don't. I enjoy your posts. merrily Jun 2015 #644

And I enjoy yours, as well as many in this forum zeemike Jun 2015 #666

If you leave, you can still read our posts, but we cannot read yours. merrily Jun 2015 #684

Well it is unlikely that I will stop replying to people who I highly respect. zeemike Jun 2015 #1058

Good to know. merrily Jun 2015 #1059

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cunning%20stunt Adrahil Jun 2015 #1054

Well I am weird I know, but no word is intolerable for me zeemike Jun 2015 #1056

Welp, that's an opinion. Adrahil Jun 2015 #1062

Well of course it is, that is what the rights of ownership is all about. zeemike Jun 2015 #1064

I get what you're saying.... Adrahil Jun 2015 #1065

What did he actually say? I know people have been trying to have him banned but I can't believe Dragonfli Jun 2015 #785

I'm a newbie by NYC_SKP standards. Paka Jun 2015 #860

I like you am just a lurker, as a matter in fact I haven't posted for years. billymayshere Jun 2015 #934

It is the "it can be a tongue twister" awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #866

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cunning%20stunt Adrahil Jun 2015 #1055

Sorry to hear that, I didn't know he'd been dealing with all of that. polly7 Jun 2015 #67

and had brain surgery recently marym625 Jun 2015 #72

I do not think there was justification for this. So now cunning stunt is a code word for cunt? Not jwirr Jun 2015 #78

* L0oniX Jun 2015 #88

Absolutely. He is banned because he supports someone else and was doing a good job of it. EarlG jwirr Jun 2015 #103

That is simply bullshit. zappaman Jun 2015 #108

C*nt is not "legit" and he should be embarrassing true supporters of any and all Dem candidates with bettyellen Jun 2015 #127

I surrender. You all know so much more than any of us anyhow. jwirr Jun 2015 #138

"You all", lol. Women are the Dem base- try respecting them instead of trying to dismiss and bettyellen Jun 2015 #155

She is part of them marym625 Jun 2015 #168

Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #243

So you are referring to another woman as an object? blackspade Jun 2015 #340

Not a fair comment. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #411

That comment is probably itself alertable, Jackpine Radical Jun 2015 #467

Yes, we women have been part of the Dem base for most of our lives. Mary and I are part of the Dem sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #983

We're criticizing you for the thing you said that was wrong CreekDog Jun 2015 #646

This message was self-deleted by its author tblue37 Jun 2015 #770

C*nt is not "legit".... bvar22 Jun 2015 #653

Thank you.. whathehell Jun 2015 #733

He called no one any such thing and you damn well know it Dragonfli Jun 2015 #807

Talk about dishonesty... Adrahil Jun 2015 #1051

You know he didn't write the word "cunt" demwing Jun 2015 #838

Oh really? Adrahil Jun 2015 #1053

I'm sad you think this. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #153

Oh my fucking god, I can't keep up with all the "insert letter here"-words. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #206

I'm going to throw a guess out there that it rhymes with ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #213

I hope not. If it is alerted on, the jury should surely vote to leave 7 to 0. Context matters. nt merrily Jun 2015 #657

Bernie's Jewish. bluedigger Jun 2015 #223

Chill dude. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #235

nope...he wasn't doing a good job recently Sheepshank Jun 2015 #634

who else was banned for supporting Sanders today? CreekDog Jun 2015 #641

EarlG turned me into a newt... awoke_in_2003 Jun 2015 #867

he called it a "tongue twister", come on CreekDog Jun 2015 #115

Which is weird, because people come right out and say horrendous stuff. It might ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #217

actually I have seen a few longtime members banned for using the "C" word CreekDog Jun 2015 #234

Who? morningfog Jun 2015 #308

You don't think they should be? nt boston bean Jun 2015 #344

Where did you get that? morningfog Jun 2015 #504

This thread here is an example of one, no? boston bean Jun 2015 #510

You are deflecting now. morningfog Jun 2015 #517

So, in your view it would be ok to use and not deserve a banning because others didn't get banned. boston bean Jun 2015 #525

You don't understand my view at all. Slow down. morningfog Jun 2015 #552

I don't know. I'm happy to see it getting the treatment it deserves. boston bean Jun 2015 #555

I suspect the last one is a big part of the reason passiveporcupine Jun 2015 #754

... Kali Jun 2015 #887

NYC_SKIP. Rex Jun 2015 #435

^^^This times 1,000^^^ Quackers Jun 2015 #495

+1001 MissDeeds Jun 2015 #702

It is loud and clear marym625 Jun 2015 #704

Indeed, it's written right there in the reason n/t arcane1 Jun 2015 #966

yep. marym625 Jun 2015 #988

Glad I'm not the only who saw that. L0oniX Jun 2015 #803

The "offending" phrase is a bit of (primarily) British wordplay hifiguy Jun 2015 #894

I agree BuelahWitch Jun 2015 #237

Was it it okay to call candidate Obama the N-word? deurbano Jun 2015 #338

Of course, not even if the person was clever about it./NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #908

who said said it?? Quayblue Jun 2015 #993

Nobody said it. I was responding to a poster who wrote: deurbano Jun 2015 #997

Seriously? CherokeeDem Jun 2015 #252

This message was self-deleted by its author 840high Jun 2015 #420

That is indisputable MissDeeds Jun 2015 #695

Google that phrase jberryhill Jun 2015 #96

yes it is zappaman Jun 2015 #98

Thanks for the context. bluedigger Jun 2015 #233

If someone called my mom or girlfriend the c word he, me or we are going to the hospital. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #118

I agree with you on this just not the ban. Politics. jwirr Jun 2015 #131

I said up thread I don't agree with the banning. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #158

I agree bravenak Jun 2015 #515

Really??? You still believe in "fighting words" ha ha Cosmic Kitten Jun 2015 #322

I live in the real world. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #368

Slow down Cassius Clay. No need for it to come to fisticuffs. Ed Suspicious Jun 2015 #448

You don't think if I drop the wrong epithet on the wrong person I am going to get a whuppin ? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #488

Yes, it is. Switch the first letters, the consonants and see what it says. uppityperson Jun 2015 #132

Here ya go. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #136

It's a sad state of affairs when we start using urban dictionary as a reference. Exilednight Jun 2015 #1020

Only if we're writing a scholarly article and don't attribute the source properly. n/t Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #1023

If that's your logic, then Fux news is a credible reference. Exilednight Jun 2015 #1027

Fox is a credible source when one is pointing out RW bias in media. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #1028

Google it tammywammy Jun 2015 #141

Nucking futs. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #241

Whut..... I dunt git it. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #580

Not quite the same. Ms. Toad Jun 2015 #740

I would never make that connection. Says more about the alerter than the poster. GoneFishin Jun 2015 #251

The poster is the one who POSTED it tkmorris Jun 2015 #275

Thank you! Paka Jun 2015 #869

Exactly. I find the word vulgar. I can cuss with the best of them, but I wince when I hear the word. GoneFishin Jun 2015 #910

and even if I did make the connection, it is still only an implication, much in the same way Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1035

Because you've never dreamt it, so, it couldn't be?? boston bean Jun 2015 #255

Seriously, it's not even code. It's a spoonerism. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #280

This ^ PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #622

Even with that being true, the meaning is clear. Rex Jun 2015 #663

Not making excuses, just observing: merrily Jun 2015 #711

I see that a lot of posters don't know what it means, guess I am wrong. Rex Jun 2015 #739

I read some posts about it and got nauseous--and I've been through a lot of surgery. merrily Jun 2015 #750

and we all know what the poster implied with the pictures in the "Not Good Enough" OP . Hiraeth Jun 2015 #1036

Are you completely obtuse? MADem Jun 2015 #281

I'm an old fart, Paka Jun 2015 #873

I'm an old fart too, but that piece of ... snark predates the internet. nt MADem Jun 2015 #881

Seen it MANY times over the years. Its not a "new" thing. 7962 Jun 2015 #297

You must not be a Metallica fan. octoberlib Jun 2015 #378

Agree. 840high Jun 2015 #416

Is that what he posted? Cunning stunt? peacebird Jun 2015 #458

Yep- in hopes a jury would not get it and he'd evade a reprimand. bettyellen Jun 2015 #533

Yes. Hissyspit Jun 2015 #809

It was a blatant and obvious bullshit excuse, he called no one the c word, no one at all. Dragonfli Jun 2015 #811

Nice try. zappaman Jun 2015 #813

Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #816

Like I said zappaman Jun 2015 #817

Learn to read Dragonfli Jun 2015 #819

I can read fine. zappaman Jun 2015 #823

Yes, thats a long known way to use the word. 7962 Jun 2015 #293

Good grief. I would never have twisted "cunning stunt" into the c word.... peacebird Jun 2015 #471

Yep. Even has its own entry in the "urban dictionary": 7962 Jun 2015 #628

And dog forbid anyone use cockney rhyming slang! Divernan Jun 2015 #751

That is true, but, prior to this thread, I was unfamiliar with the term. merrily Jun 2015 #788

Me too peacebird Jun 2015 #798

Witch hunters are very clever at finding "witch marks" where a pimple exists Dragonfli Jun 2015 #818

I agree with all you have said and feel we have lost a strong voice. DUers snappyturtle Jun 2015 #397

I hope so, he has been through the mill with his health issues and brain surgery. Autumn Jun 2015 #68

Hide yea ...ban? L0oniX Jun 2015 #76

I can't remember for sure who called Hillary the c word in 2007 but they didn't get banned. Autumn Jun 2015 #86

Of course the D word has gotten a lot of use too without bans. L0oniX Jun 2015 #97

It is what it is. Autumn Jun 2015 #102

IMO, avoiding all genitalia words as slurs is preferable. merrily Jun 2015 #680

We haven't gotten the word in the Gungeon. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #725

But no gets outraged over "prick" Mnpaul Jun 2015 #929

Why would you say that to someone who posted she does not use that kind of term? merrily Jun 2015 #957

I was just curious on how you felt about that term Mnpaul Jun 2015 #981

Probably because most guys dont really care about it. or "prick" either. 7962 Jun 2015 #932

Should have been banned then lark Jun 2015 #285

Just go to 'site search' and look and see how many have used the actual word and survived. Rex Jun 2015 #426

I thought I had that thread bookmarked but some of those old threads no longer exist. Autumn Jun 2015 #463

If this will make some think before posting nasty shit about the other guy/gals pony Rex Jun 2015 #478

If this means Skinner has less tolerance for misogyny (as Earl G has for years) then I'll take it... bettyellen Jun 2015 #573

No I don't think so. Rex Jun 2015 #604

I am with you on that. If Skinner finally sees how fucked up it is- he is now way ahead of many here bettyellen Jun 2015 #617

Very true, plus being a bigot is not very progressive imo. Rex Jun 2015 #633

Agree. Because when women were complaining about misogyny and stalking nothing was done. cui bono Jun 2015 #544

Pages and pages. Rex Jun 2015 #560

agree that the search on this site is near useless. merrily Jun 2015 #688

Or not anti- women. Wow! Imagine that. bettyellen Jun 2015 #91

I have to stand up for EarlG on this one - TBF Jun 2015 #133

For now the only safe place from the haters is the Bernie Sanders group. L0oniX Jun 2015 #144

It's been like that for the leftynyc Jun 2015 #457

Not even. merrily Jun 2015 #942

There is a forum for Bernie here.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #185

I do tend to look at greatest threads every day - TBF Jun 2015 #212

There seems to be a heightened level of hostility to women here and bettyellen Jun 2015 #240

Which host of the Bernie forum laughed along at the c*nt tongue twister ? Autumn Jun 2015 #215

You can refer back to the original thread - am not linking to it as requested because bettyellen Jun 2015 #228

Would you PM the link to me please? No host in the Bernie group is laughing at that post Autumn Jun 2015 #230

Wait- was Skip the host referred to in that thread? bettyellen Jun 2015 #268

Really? hootinholler Jun 2015 #497

Witness their discussions on how they cannot trust anyone in GD because they are not really bettyellen Jun 2015 #514

Well since you're saying you're pointing hootinholler Jun 2015 #557

There are two threads there discussing Sander's need to broaden his outreach.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #586

Hm, I haven't seen that. Can you provide an example? cui bono Jun 2015 #589

I think you nailed it with the "war room" mentality and how it does no one any good.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #639

It is interesting that EarlG and not Skinner banned him as they typically ban for very different uppityperson Jun 2015 #362

Agree - TBF Jun 2015 #489

well, not always... CreekDog Jun 2015 #676

You can always hang in the Bernie Group here. Then, there is the Bernie campaign's page merrily Jun 2015 #735

I agree with the hide and even a time out without 5 hides Ichingcarpenter Jun 2015 #256

Me too. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #77

+1 BainsBane Jun 2015 #520

Me, too, L0oniX... MrMickeysMom Jun 2015 #956

About.Fucking.Time. truebrit71 Jun 2015 #12

Hey, what's up buddy? pintobean Jun 2015 #588

Sorry, which one was just banned and which one were you piling on about...buddy... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #626

You jumped my ass for gravedancing pintobean Jun 2015 #638

You are correct. You weren't grave-dancing... truebrit71 Jun 2015 #661

Ignore must be working pintobean Jun 2015 #710

LOL!!!! truebrit71 Jun 2015 #713

#FreeNYC_SKP Man from Pickens Jun 2015 #13

He already been free'd. Iggo Jun 2015 #24

+1 n/t JTFrog Jun 2015 #28

Nope. Keefer Jun 2015 #476

Free'd from his DU shackles, I meant. Iggo Jun 2015 #563

If only it could trend here on DU. jwirr Jun 2015 #87

Well, we all know this can happen to any of us, potentially. closeupready Jun 2015 #14

Uhhh, no this can't happen to just anyone. tammywammy Jun 2015 #214

Not going to spar with you, out of respect for the threadstarter. closeupready Jun 2015 #247

"I will never be banned...for using that word...because I don't use it" demwing Jun 2015 #1060

I'll buy this when... TreasonousBastard Jun 2015 #15

No, this has been a standard of behavior for the entire existence of DU. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #20

I am well aware of that... TreasonousBastard Jun 2015 #58

It's part of being perceived as privileged. Calling me a dick is both appropriate and acceptable. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #93

Considering that some inmates here have taken over the asylum, closeupready Jun 2015 #32

There are pejoratives and there are pejoratives DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #42

I find your post to be funny in an ironic sort of way. Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #261

I went back and changed c--t to the c word in all my posts on this topic.... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #299

They 'can' but I'm sure you will agree that Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #377

I have been having some trouble with all these letter words hfojvt Jun 2015 #1008

'Dickhead' is by no measure equivalent. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #46

Sorry, those 2 words are not at all the same. lark Jun 2015 #310

Dick and prick are in fact used constantly and intentionally in a "mean and hateful" way. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2015 #935

No need to fret BainsBane Jun 2015 #496

+1 cui bono Jun 2015 #605

I remember well BainsBane Jun 2015 #683

Agree with you there. MindPilot Jun 2015 #694

Why? Very few men are particularly ruffled by being called a dickhead. Codeine Jun 2015 #1019

Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #16

Angry Supporters of Sanders. Iggo Jun 2015 #26

It was accidental, but oh so apropos. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #64

"It was accidental" TBF Jun 2015 #84

as if... Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #94

Are you suggesting all Sanders supporters should be banned? nt TBF Jun 2015 #30

Stop. Agschmid Jun 2015 #40

Nope. Try again maybe? bettyellen Jun 2015 #53

If you can quote any part of anything I EVER SAID that would suggest banning all Sanders supports... Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #70

!!! Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #317

Well Capt. Obvious Jun 2015 #65

That post is a bit muddled. Your feeling is that Skippy was the only Sanders bad boy at DU? Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #101

I haven't met any of these angry supporters AgingAmerican Jun 2015 #257

Well, then all of "Angry Supporters of Sanders" better toe the line. madfloridian Jun 2015 #290

This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #321

That's ugly. madfloridian Jun 2015 #379

Yes, and not even that clever. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #385

Long past due leftynyc Jun 2015 #17

He's been grumpy lately jberryhill Jun 2015 #18

Please, no grave dancing. cleanhippie Jun 2015 #19

Unf unf unf AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #39

... trotsky Jun 2015 #499

Saw that coming a long time ago. demmiblue Jun 2015 #21

Dumb move on his part. nt City Lights Jun 2015 #23

He deserved it. DCBob Jun 2015 #25

+ 10000 This ^ misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #462

I'm gonna miss him. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #27

So will I... haikugal Jun 2015 #405

Same here. eom. Raine1967 Jun 2015 #521

I will too. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2015 #539

Me too. immoderate Jun 2015 #698

That is unfortunate. I will miss him but he shouldn't have gone that far. n/t Avalux Jun 2015 #29

Me thinks jamzrockz Jun 2015 #31

Why would you think he was doing nothing constructive with his life? polly7 Jun 2015 #49

I said jamzrockz Jun 2015 #239

That's right, everything you said was speculation. polly7 Jun 2015 #248

I wouldn't even call the dumbest GOP female candidate that Ugly word. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #491

Yeah, me either. polly7 Jun 2015 #506

Mysogony misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #538

Or just a stupid play on words that he wouldn't normally have done but in a moment polly7 Jun 2015 #553

Yup. Not his fault, it was the "troll". misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #650

Selective reading for an agenda much? Bye, bye. Sorry it didn't work out for you. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #662

Yes, I didn't know much about him jamzrockz Jun 2015 #709

I didn't know about all his health scares either, that's very sad for him. polly7 Jun 2015 #714

I hear ya. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #474

No, it's not true. That poster has absolutely no knowledge of NYC Skip's life. polly7 Jun 2015 #606

Embarrassing is defending someone who got banned for using the c-word misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #665

No, I spelled out what was embarrassing about that post. polly7 Jun 2015 #679

"This battle is O V E R. " Very telling use of words you have there. cui bono Jun 2015 #691

Good point! nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #699

+1 JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #343

Thank you EarlG. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #34

Agreed. n/t JTFrog Jun 2015 #63

Agree - EarlG has been very good TBF Jun 2015 #100

I myself do not think Skip was any representative Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #167

I remember when DU3 came online... he went absolutely ballistic towards a teacher or two. demmiblue Jun 2015 #219

He did. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #232

He was also very nasty to Atheists and Agnostics Heddi Jun 2015 #824

Wow, I missed all of that, outrageous. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #835

If I didn't want to relive the trauma of his hateful words, i'd dig up old posts for proof Heddi Jun 2015 #857

I remember when that happened. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #871

People want to blame his nastiness on his brain surgery Heddi Jun 2015 #874

I think DU3 destroyed him. pintobean Jun 2015 #895

There were many moderators who were called (by themselves and others) PermaMods Heddi Jun 2015 #903

What's amazing to me is how illiberal some liberals are DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #920

Well said Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #1073

I didn't know about any of this. joshcryer Jun 2015 #1002

I'm no perfect angel either. Starry Messenger Jun 2015 #1006

Yes, Mahalo Starry Messenger.. there are "Bernie Supporters" who aren't excusing this and really Cha Jun 2015 #1011

VINDICATION! AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #35

LOL! merrily Jun 2015 #992

That is way too severe marym625 Jun 2015 #36

I agree. femmocrat Jun 2015 #51

I agree also. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #60

I agree it is too severe. glinda Jun 2015 #165

Its not even about WHO he supported. This is about his nasty insulting personal attacks misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #508

I have had no issue with him. glinda Jun 2015 #678

I agree MissDeeds Jun 2015 #225

Yep. *smh* nt bunnies Jun 2015 #305

i'm a strong Hillary supporter, but i don't like banning people who don't think like me samsingh Jun 2015 #332

He wasn't banned for not supporting Hillary, nor was he banned misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #518

true enough - but still banning someone for a word in a world of free speech is excessive samsingh Jun 2015 #631

DU has its limits. Take up your "free speech" issue with Earl G. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #670

He did NOT use that word. The two words he used meant nothing to clueless folks like me. madfloridian Jun 2015 #637

I liked him... Agschmid Jun 2015 #664

Just because you didn't recognize it doesn't mean he and everyone else didn't geek tragedy Jun 2015 #732

Certainly not "everyone else" Jim Lane Jun 2015 #996

I leave the decision about severity of punishment geek tragedy Jun 2015 #1018

Yes, the site owners can ban. And we can denounce the ban. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #1031

Then let the rules apply evenly across the board MissDeeds Jun 2015 #728

He wasn't banned for "not thinking like you".. he was banned for trying to be "clever" with his Cha Jun 2015 #1015

I agree. madfloridian Jun 2015 #399

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #591

And you know this how? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #599

years of lurking before they signed up, don't ya know. uppityperson Jun 2015 #615

That last post gave him away. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #660

Totally agree with you, Marym . . . markpkessinger Jun 2015 #706

"Posting Priveleges Revoked" Snobblevitch Jun 2015 #37

nope he's gone otherwise it would say under review Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #73

The only way this could become temporary is if he sends an email to Skinner asking to be reinstated. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #104

Except he didn't actually use that word. Did he? Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #135

No, not really. So maybe Skinner will let NYC_SKP return. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #271

Yes, he did. Arguing format over content and cowering behind implication is simply puerile. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #339

Like when Barbara Bush called Geraldine Ferraro the $4million thing that rhymes with rich./NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #442

Long time coming. Well deserved. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #38

I wish him the best and good health. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #41

Your the best Justin and thanks for the context elsewhere in the thread. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #451

My pleasure. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #454

Hard to imagine it takes 69K posts before someone decides he doesn't belong. Jesus Malverde Jun 2015 #464

peace my friend. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #469

+1 Quackers Jun 2015 #577

You are always welcome here. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #594

Why would you support phil89 Jun 2015 #1061

What should i do? Wish him bad? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #1063

Harsh n/t prayin4rain Jun 2015 #43

How ironic that his last post pintobean Jun 2015 #44

Good riddance- hope it will give those who chuckled along pause.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #47

Bummer BeyondGeography Jun 2015 #48

Good RetroLounge Jun 2015 #50

Unrec. Smarmie Doofus Jun 2015 #54

To what end? You think he can justify that? Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #62

Of course, he can email admin. They have occasionally reversed a ban. uppityperson Jun 2015 #82

that's not something one can explain/justify nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #107

whether I like him or not, this just makes me sad Marrah_G Jun 2015 #55

Indeed, totally agree. nt uppityperson Jun 2015 #370

We lost a very bright member. Keenly intelligent. Lost perspective due to intensity, I imagine. Gregorian Jun 2015 #57

+1000. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #85

+ a thousand thousand thousand. Octafish Jun 2015 #278

It will be much better.His hate begat hate. Clear as day. misterhighwasted Jun 2015 #569

Don't underestimate the effect of serious health issues and longterm medication use. blm Jun 2015 #333

He had become tremendously unpleasant of late. Codeine Jun 2015 #59

I agree he usually was one of the most level headed around here imo. Rex Jun 2015 #376

Of late? After the Newtown shooting - 2012 - he famously Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #470

And then when the Charlie Hebdo offices got shot up, he blamed the victims up one geek tragedy Jun 2015 #779

And then the numerous times he referred to the Atheists/Agnostic on DU Heddi Jun 2015 #825

He had brain surgery not long ago MissDeeds Jun 2015 #746

Ok... I'm Confused... WillyT Jun 2015 #66

The admins can probably see the name removed post Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #90

he was replying to an oft-returning troll. MIRT got them quickly. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #112

Was he using those words mocking back in kind? nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #117

not sure of his intent, but yes, throwing the trolls' words back at them. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #134

I don't agree with him doing it, but that should have been taken into polly7 Jun 2015 #154

Agree...Time Out not a banning. He has 80% Jury Approval and Star Membership KoKo Jun 2015 #191

Yes, especially giving consideration to his surgeries. polly7 Jun 2015 #202

yes. marym625 Jun 2015 #723

Making excuses because you had to "untwist " the words - as he suggested- to read c*nt? bettyellen Jun 2015 #116

Were You Here For The 2008 Primaries Between HRC And Barack Obama ??? WillyT Jun 2015 #163

A 5-2 hide reveals one of two things Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #181

So yeah- making loads of excuses for tossing out slurs.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #428

First, I HATE Zero-Tolerance Bullshit... I Prefer To Use Judgement... WillyT Jun 2015 #597

Folks are confusing the punishment with the crime. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #481

Banned for perceived use of foul pig Latin? PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #122

He knew. He'd seen the phrase before. Dr. Strange Jun 2015 #477

See post #98. JTFrog Jun 2015 #151

In the last few days, I'd finally hit my limit with his crap... MANative Jun 2015 #69

Agree. freshwest Jun 2015 #350

I also had enough of the disruptive behavior (and it was not because of supporting a candidate). Sancho Jun 2015 #738

seems harsh for the post edhopper Jun 2015 #71

that's the point, he thought he was being clever by pushing the boundaries. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #80

I still think edhopper Jun 2015 #111

he may get reinstated. probably after the primaries would be the soonest geek tragedy Jun 2015 #119

mine either edhopper Jun 2015 #485

The anti Hillary crap here is so over the top that I guess I'm sufrommich Jun 2015 #75

Self delete- with thanks to Autumn bettyellen Jun 2015 #83

I hope you remove this post now that you know you were mistaken and no host cheered him on. Autumn Jun 2015 #689

There was an over the top post a few months back on President Obama by a long termer, where the still_one Jun 2015 #288

+1 Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #523

Well said. And I agree completely with your post. Number23 Jun 2015 #814

this is one reason why mrs. unblock will never be a du member unblock Jun 2015 #79

Let TRP use the same word to describe a hated conservative female and it's cheered. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #114

Calling a woman, even a hated one, the c word here wouldn't survive. /NT DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #139

You're right about that but post a link to TRP saying it and it's all good. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #147

Pardon my ignorance but who is TRP? DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #172

The Rude Pundit. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #189

That's the truth... one_voice Jun 2015 #672

The British historically also had no problem using racial epithets for African Americans and Asians, still_one Jun 2015 #313

i think you mean epithets, not epitaphs. unblock Jun 2015 #327

Yes, thank you, I will correct it. You make a good point about my terminology also still_one Jun 2015 #630

Brits also call cigarettes f**s. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #354

um, i don't really have one.... unblock Jun 2015 #384

Wow. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #81

Not commenting on the poster one way or the other, but I've seen more offensive posts hughee99 Jun 2015 #89

You've seen posts that are more offensive that calling Hillary a **** survive a jury? Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #109

Grind your axe elsewhere. n/t hughee99 Jun 2015 #140

This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #143

"My opinion is the jury system is totally broken, and that affirms it. " hughee99 Jun 2015 #150

This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #162

I'm glad to be keeping you from being productive or perhaps annoying someone else hughee99 Jun 2015 #166

He did NOT use that word. To the naive like me I can see no connection to what he said. madfloridian Jun 2015 #549

That's not good. H2O Man Jun 2015 #92

+1 /nt RiverLover Jun 2015 #207

I agree. n/t ms liberty Jun 2015 #341

+ 1000 I truly like NYC SKP, he had a lot of thoughtful & wonderful OPs over the years. peacebird Jun 2015 #445

Me too. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #566

Agree... nenagh Jun 2015 #621

Remember what he posted after the Newtown shootings in 2012? CreekDog Jun 2015 #95

He called Charlie Hebdo racists and suggested they were responsible for the shooting. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #106

Indeed he did, in most starling terms. The poster was a conservative on many issues and on that Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #543

Sadly, he got away with it too. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #659

His posts on Charlie Hebdo were absolutely disgusting melman Jun 2015 #896

missed that one. must have been stellar nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #113

he self-deleted the OP but copied it to the last post in the thread for posterity CreekDog Jun 2015 #178

Wow, how compassionate of the poster given the murder of twenty CHILDREN... Spazito Jun 2015 #794

That's what got me. In the past I have seen him Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #125

I think I may have to agree PowerToThePeople Jun 2015 #174

So my memory didn't fail me. Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #224

He loved trolling feminists here and making it a hostile atmosphere bettyellen Jun 2015 #208

I think you are misremembering something. Kali Jun 2015 #837

I often wondered if he was more anti-Clinton than pro-Sanders. MADem Jun 2015 #342

I was thinking he was actually a conservative. Kingofalldems Jun 2015 #348

I think he was a conservative, too. His attitude towards guns MADem Jun 2015 #482

Being pro-gun does not make one a conservative. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #852

There's pro gun, and there's pro gun NRA-style. nt MADem Jun 2015 #883

Some people have such hard feelings I doubt they see a difference. NutmegYankee Jun 2015 #891

I am not a gun banner or grabber. MADem Jun 2015 #925

I do. Sometimes it takes a while for a gun apologist to burn out here. onehandle Jun 2015 #137

This message was self-deleted by its author freshwest Jun 2015 #301

Are people that are saying he didn't actually use the c-word for real? LexVegas Jun 2015 #99

I won't miss him. boston bean Jun 2015 #105

I have a rather low opinion of her but I would never use that word to describe her or any woman CBGLuthier Jun 2015 #110

I enjoyed reading his posts rock Jun 2015 #120

5-2 hide on the post that did him in. The 2 should be banned as well. nt onehandle Jun 2015 #121

+1 AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #126

You want to ban jurors whose opinions you don't like? Not surprised. Comrade Grumpy Jun 2015 #159

Be careful not to get caught in the "feeding frenzy". Just sayin'. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #171

So we *shouldn't* ban everyone who recommended one of his threads? Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #571

There seem to be a powerful feeling in self-righteousness. nm rhett o rick Jun 2015 #879

Absolutely! That explains some of what goes on at DU. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #1032

I don't know that it's the main value, but it's sure ok here, if you are on the side of rhett o rick Jun 2015 #1038

There are always some in these threads pintobean Jun 2015 #177

+1 Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #391

Nobody is going to get banned for voting on a jury. Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #535

Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #558

Cruised for a bruisin' Prism Jun 2015 #123

. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #124

From this experience I've learned quite a lot more about the member & group which appalachiablue Jun 2015 #784

. NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #789

How bizarre to be banned over that bit of silliness. valerief Jun 2015 #128

C*nt is a "bit of silliness"? Nope- it's hateful and bigoted. bettyellen Jun 2015 #142

The word doesn't bother me in the least. But I didn't see the post. I thought the post valerief Jun 2015 #173

makenthe same argument for n****r and k**e- please proceed to educate us, Val! bettyellen Jun 2015 #192

Well, I don't know about the word knee, but as for the other word, black rappers valerief Jun 2015 #203

Lol, so you're okay with n*****r and will be when Bernie gets k*k* thrown at him.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #221

white males using the N-word and the C-word aren't taking the power out of the words CreekDog Jun 2015 #264

And his context was both clear and obvious to even the dullest halfwit. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #357

Every poster I have ever seen here defending racism or sexism ignores history and denies context.... bettyellen Jun 2015 #460

That poster got banned from a group here for using that word. JTFrog Jun 2015 #176

Got a link? pintobean Jun 2015 #187

You sure do seem to have a link fetish. JTFrog Jun 2015 #199

Thank you. It's only fair pintobean Jun 2015 #216

Wait. So that user got a hide but NYC_SKP got banned? bunnies Jun 2015 #402

NYC SKP was banned for his recent posting history. The use of that offensive word was just a pretext morningfog Jun 2015 #559

He has only one hide. bunnies Jun 2015 #575

Recent posting history = highly critical of Hillary. morningfog Jun 2015 #752

Thats certainly the way it seems to me. bunnies Jun 2015 #764

Why don't you take that up with Skinner in ATA? Here's a Bernie Supporter who thinks that's rubbish Cha Jun 2015 #1013

That's what it looks like. leveymg Jun 2015 #627

Interesting. There is not a zero tolerance ban on the word. morningfog Jun 2015 #519

Wow.. Cha Jun 2015 #1010

Good heavens, I'd forgotten all about that. I used it as a joke response to a valerief Jun 2015 #195

Still not funny dude. JTFrog Jun 2015 #204

Yeah, still not laughing Texasgal Jun 2015 #209

He's been off the reservation sharp_stick Jun 2015 #129

That's a little bigoted. polly7 Jun 2015 #148

A little careless putting it in print for people to read too. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #169

Very. I hope he/she will edit it. It's not pleasant to read. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #182

I am going to hope that be the case. Will check back. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #198

+1. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #472

It's apparently DU approved. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #572

Not for long. (I hope ... we'll see). nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #578

Well, apparently it's been alerted on and is fine to stay. polly7 Jun 2015 #584

Yeah jury said it was DU approved. lonestarnot Jun 2015 #596

My irony meter is broken nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #715

Thanks for letting us know. Your "pretty please" couldn't stop the grave-dancing. rhett o rick Jun 2015 #130

Thank you EarlG! nt William769 Jun 2015 #145

Good! Oh, and you sexist enablers are pathetic. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #146

Are you addressing me? cyberswede Jun 2015 #422

Not unless you're a sexist! MoonRiver Jun 2015 #468

I wasn't sure, since you used the word "you" cyberswede Jun 2015 #480

Sorry about that! MoonRiver Jun 2015 #532

I won't defend him. he's been skating the edge for a while Scootaloo Jun 2015 #718

Maybe it will be. MoonRiver Jun 2015 #737

If SKP is reading this thread LittleBlue Jun 2015 #149

To be fair... DU has set up a Sanders group where Sanders fans are totally protected. Buzz Clik Jun 2015 #156

I hate the protected group system too LittleBlue Jun 2015 #170

probably a troll. mopinko Jun 2015 #643

Not true. Had I seen the term and recognized it for what it is--I would have alerted a DU jury. merrily Jun 2015 #721

sadly true glinda Jun 2015 #179

I don't see how it's going to work. DU is essentially anti-Hillary LittleBlue Jun 2015 #200

Actually many Hillary supporting DUers may come back OKNancy Jun 2015 #324

Perhaps the admin has decided to drop the Underground part. zeemike Jun 2015 #651

That is how I see it LittleBlue Jun 2015 #690

DU won't see a mass migration when Bernie loses the primary Godhumor Jun 2015 #210

DU was heavily in favor of Obama by the middle of 2008 LittleBlue Jun 2015 #226

Maybe, but attitudes toward Republicans won't change, either. merrily Jun 2015 #729

I think that statements like this is what is glinda Jun 2015 #307

Maybe that is DU's fait. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #926

Locking. TOS does not specify whether calling out DUers applies to current or former members. randome Jun 2015 #152

You really do want me to post that gif, don't you? freshwest Jun 2015 #312

Too bad. I hope he/she is allowed to return. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2015 #157

A real loss. Octafish Jun 2015 #160

If a female candidate for the nomination can't be called a C-word on DU, what??? CreekDog Jun 2015 #260

The banned member is the one that didn't hold up to scrutiny. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #316

over 68,000 posts and service as a moderator. merrily Jun 2015 #161

I so much agree. madfloridian Jun 2015 #611

That is too bad...I really liked him. SoapBox Jun 2015 #164

The first of many to come nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #175

Even though I tend to disagree with him more than I agree with him... MohRokTah Jun 2015 #180

He's been on my ignore list for years. El Supremo Jun 2015 #183

I'm going to miss him and had him on ignore for over a year olddots Jun 2015 #184

Calling Clinton the C word is despicable. herding cats Jun 2015 #188

good ann--- Jun 2015 #190

I have nothing to lose, so I'm going to say it. The banning was biased. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #194

I won't try to convince you... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #263

There is nothing to convince me of. We are agreed on the main points. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #277

I would have given him a thirty day ban and not a permanent one. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #289

Agreed m' Dear. Puglover Jun 2015 #270

or hey, the one talking about a black man getting shot in the back, polly7 Jun 2015 #283

Yep. Absurd. cliffordu Jun 2015 #707

That is too bad. I like SKP. Hope to see him back. raouldukelives Jun 2015 #196

You all know what George Carlin would say about censorship. randys1 Jun 2015 #197

OFFS. NuclearDem Jun 2015 #254

I wonder what can be done about trolls who follow posters around and make smart ass randys1 Jun 2015 #262

I demand the right to call Hillary a c*! George Carlin! PC police! NuclearDem Jun 2015 #303

Nothing, it would seem. Been going on for a long time. randys1 Jun 2015 #309

The George Carlin who said this about women with eating disorders: geek tragedy Jun 2015 #319

The man was a genius, and he was not politically correct. His standards were quite high randys1 Jun 2015 #421

"incorrect word" is not an accurate way of describing geek tragedy Jun 2015 #432

Complete and total nonsense. randys1 Jun 2015 #441

apologies for using an "incorrect word" nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #443

There are consequences to the words we use, for me, you, and the late George Carlin... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #351

No, there are not consequences for everybody. madfloridian Jun 2015 #500

He's not silenced, and he may continue to use that word indiscriminately should he so choose. LanternWaste Jun 2015 #394

I agree about censorship, and second your appeal to Admin to grant clemency leveymg Jun 2015 #601

This message was self-deleted by its author brentspeak Jun 2015 #201

What about the Rude Pundit? jalan48 Jun 2015 #205

The Rude Pundit is not a member and does not post here. bluedigger Jun 2015 #295

Thanks for the clarification. jalan48 Jun 2015 #306

The word does not belong here. Anyone copying and pasting can blank out letters, just as they would merrily Jun 2015 #792

I assumed meegbear = The Rude Pundit. merrily Jun 2015 #822

I consider that a very sad thing. madfloridian Jun 2015 #211

I can see why that post was too much... Sancho Jun 2015 #220

Ugh. KamaAina Jun 2015 #222

I am sorry to see that question everything Jun 2015 #227

Didn't always agree with him (who does?) but I'll miss him. Throd Jun 2015 #229

Permanent ban too harsh IMO. n/t moondust Jun 2015 #231

What in the bloody HELL was he thinking? Puglover Jun 2015 #236

Agreed, I hope he will be allowed back. He was a long time member and it's sad to see this Autumn Jun 2015 #696

He disrupted constantly...and poorly. MADem Jun 2015 #238

I "don't have a dog in this hunt" and don't think I've run across this guy before, but.... George II Jun 2015 #245

That is NOT what the post said. Be honest. madfloridian Jun 2015 #246

He was a stealth troll. But to each his own I suppose. nt boston bean Jun 2015 #249

It was crystal clear what he was doing, and yes he was calling her that name geek tragedy Jun 2015 #273

had him pegged as a shitbag after he posted the gun porn thread in GD after the Newtown shooting KG Jun 2015 #253

I will miss NYC_SKP. We did not always agree, but I think that banning him for making a joke JDPriestly Jun 2015 #258

So, he tried to slip in a cheap shot Wash. state Desk Jet Jun 2015 #266

BS ban! Cosmic Kitten Jun 2015 #267

It can be tough when the realization hits a person for the first time LanternWaste Jun 2015 #406

Wow a hide would have been enough dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #269

I agree. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #274

Interesting double standard nichomachus Jun 2015 #272

No, false equivalency on your part. "Dick" is in no way in the same category geek tragedy Jun 2015 #276

Nonsense nichomachus Jun 2015 #286

It's not fully equivalent for anyone who actually speaks American English geek tragedy Jun 2015 #294

Exactly. deurbano Jun 2015 #353

^^This^^ Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #392

YES, it is. polly7 Jun 2015 #296

Different rules for different people. bunnies Jun 2015 #413

A little surprised at the support this member recieves here. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #279

Sanders has attracted a lot of people who just plain hate Hillary Clinton. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #287

I agree with you one hundred percent that it reflects on Sanders in no way. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #346

It's a way of separating the true Bernie supporters vs the hatewagon crowd nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #358

His posts were becoming so vitriolic and rabid that I'm not surprised by this outcome. Metric System Jun 2015 #780

very appropriate - absolutely no need for that here DrDan Jun 2015 #282

I don't know if an outright banning is warranted. Xyzse Jun 2015 #291

several people.... quickesst Jun 2015 #292

Wow, he should have been more creative in his cursing. backscatter712 Jun 2015 #300

That was a dumb and offensive thing to write. I wonder, though, if his banning was morningfog Jun 2015 #304

SKP's demeanor changed. It wasn't just that we supported different candidates, it was personal. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #311

According to posters upthread, he was having serious health issues and polly7 Jun 2015 #318

That may be a plausible explanation. However, if that's the case, perhaps this isn't the place for Tarheel_Dem Jun 2015 #323

He screwed up. polly7 Jun 2015 #337

That's too bad, but I don't feel too sorry for him Jack Rabbit Jun 2015 #314

Honestly... Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #315

Please be clearer. I'd appreciate it. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #329

My post was clear Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #361

I have my opinion. Your post was a threat. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #364

Ok Bobbie Jo Jun 2015 #483

I think she is saying that as the primary season heats up BainsBane Jun 2015 #765

I was part of the jury yesterday Takket Jun 2015 #320

Were you able to see the post he was replying to? dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #363

no. i tried to read it, but it was deleted. Takket Jun 2015 #371

So the jury could not see the post he was replying to dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #388

here you go. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #390

Thanks dreamnightwind Jun 2015 #418

It would not surprise me if many of us "Block Members" on this list to be banned Purveyor Jun 2015 #325

Are you suggesting that people on that list are likely to call Clinton the c-word? geek tragedy Jun 2015 #331

I never knew until now, given his posts, that he was part of the HRC group nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #335

He wasn't part of the HRC group, he was BANNED from it. nt MADem Jun 2015 #545

Thanks for the clarification nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #556

The Bernie Sanders Group is a little over a month old William769 Jun 2015 #360

He asked me to ban him. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #374

I know he did. William769 Jun 2015 #381

My pleasure. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #386

You literally asked me to ban you so don't act like your a martyr. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #369

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Purveyor Jun 2015 #389

Now if we could just get you to respond to your innuendo's. William769 Jun 2015 #395

LOL. Ironic. polly7 Jun 2015 #398

How so? hrmjustin Jun 2015 #400

Oh, the poster I responded to, who isn't you ...... knows very well. polly7 Jun 2015 #410

Well the poster he was responded to literally asked me to ban him so i did. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #412

Well that's good. polly7 Jun 2015 #419

i mention it because he posted this; hrmjustin Jun 2015 #425

Yeah ok whatever. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #427

Yeah well that is why Bill and i were responding to him. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #430

Great! polly7 Jun 2015 #434

but i asked you how so. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #438

And I told you it had nothing to do with you. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #439

oh i see you can't back it up. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #444

Oh do you now?? polly7 Jun 2015 #450

Of course. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #452

Of course. Thanks. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #456

We won Justin. Just move on. William769 Jun 2015 #487

LOL. polly7 Jun 2015 #512

Oh my lord. Puglover Jun 2015 #609

I see cirickets is all we are going to get. Typical William769 Jun 2015 #403

VERY! polly7 Jun 2015 #407

OMG! It took him all of 3 minutes to make a reply so lets haul out the {{{crickets}}} Purveyor Jun 2015 #417

True, and now that you have seen it, still crickets. William769 Jun 2015 #423

................. polly7 Jun 2015 #431

Nothing worthy of responding to. I merily speculated the future here at DU. eom Purveyor Jun 2015 #404

Right... William769 Jun 2015 #409

Wow, I had no idea this was happening! haikugal Jun 2015 #686

A good banning MuseRider Jun 2015 #326

I support this banning tammywammy Jun 2015 #334

That's too bad. I like(d) SKP, and he added a lot to DU over the years petronius Jun 2015 #336

Thank you, EarlG. SunSeeker Jun 2015 #345

Not to forget- digonswine Jun 2015 #795

Just for the record this is what the poster he was responding to said. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #347

thanks for that, Justin Kali Jun 2015 #647

transparency is good. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #654

Is it possible that he didnt even know what "cunning stunt" meant? bunnies Jun 2015 #703

I can't speak to that but i can tell you i knew what it meant. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #708

Guess Im just behind the lingo times as usual. bunnies Jun 2015 #712

People make mistakes. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #719

Thank you for posting this information. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #800

Well that makes the ban look even more ridiculous Egnever Jun 2015 #919

Okay, I think I caught up to what happened… stupid decision to provoke privileges, IYAM MrMickeysMom Jun 2015 #953

The crazy season (primaries) always claims a member or two it seems. mmonk Jun 2015 #349

More like egg shells nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #356

Most likely. mmonk Jun 2015 #749

That's kind of shocking. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #352

Agree. madfloridian Jun 2015 #373

he became a target of at least two, largely non-overlapping, gangs of harassers carolinayellowdog Jun 2015 #355

Harsh punishment for one occurrence. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #359

I am very upset about it. So angry I may have to take a break or risk banning. madfloridian Jun 2015 #367

Me too, mad. AtomicKitten Jun 2015 #380

Same here MissDeeds Jun 2015 #790

+1000. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #383

+1 darkangel218 Jun 2015 #449

+100000000 peacebird Jun 2015 #455

...^ that 840high Jun 2015 #461

I agree: hide the post, give a 'time-out' when enough hides accrue, but I petronius Jun 2015 #507

I kind of remember from the old days.... Renew Deal Jun 2015 #564

I agree. Blue_In_AK Jun 2015 #673

I agree. I could live with a hide, even suspension. But a ban is over the top... Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #773

Hiding the post would have been enough. ozone_man Jun 2015 #365

Sid is in timeout and NYC_SKIP is banned...DU is in upside down world. Rex Jun 2015 #366

I wouldn't give either one of the two that title... so I'm not sure which is which. ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #372

I like both for different reasons. We all stir at times. Rex Jun 2015 #382

I don't think it's about disrespecting the candidates tammywammy Jun 2015 #393

I've seen that word used here and not get a hide or the person banned Rex Jun 2015 #414

message sent...... Don't call Hillary a c*nt... seems simple enough, wouldn't you say? boston bean Jun 2015 #446

Yes I would. Rex Jun 2015 #465

And yet POS used car salesman is just fine Egnever Jun 2015 #922

I alerterd when I saw it used on Plain or Bachman because it's not okay against any woman. bettyellen Jun 2015 #484

Good! I alert if I see it and a few other choice words. Rex Jun 2015 #492

This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Jun 2015 #551

seabeyond is on summer vacation too Renew Deal Jun 2015 #574

Primary season is seeing a lot of casualties from all over the DU spectrum. Rex Jun 2015 #783

That's going to be a long one pintobean Jun 2015 #853

I know. Renew Deal Jun 2015 #856

Sad to see a long timer go mvd Jun 2015 #375

Whew shenmue Jun 2015 #387

Sanders & Clinton threads quickly come and go. But a thread about a banned DUer garners 400 replies. randome Jun 2015 #396

Think that is bad, try wasting time by posting actual news articles and see how lonely that is. eom Purveyor Jun 2015 #424

And look at the speed! Over 500 replies already! randome Jun 2015 #509

We like to talk about ourselves. neverforget Jun 2015 #743

I'm sorry to hear that. 840high Jun 2015 #408

Banning a long time Du'er who has contributed a lot here doesn't seem liberal to me The Straight Story Jun 2015 #415

I'm happy to exclude misogynistic speech from the big tent. boston bean Jun 2015 #475

Du is a witch hunt anymore The Straight Story Jun 2015 #493

I don't see someone calling a woman a c*nt as a progressive attribute. boston bean Jun 2015 #505

Ah I see, one post out of thousands and you latch onto that one The Straight Story Jun 2015 #590

I see you disagree. You can educate yourself if you want. boston bean Jun 2015 #635

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #619

I see you disagree. You can educate yourself if you want. boston bean Jun 2015 #623

Well, you'll always have Discussionist nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #537

Witch hunting is a lesser issue that people alerting on posters who hurt their feelings Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #652

The Big Tent can do without misogyny and NRA viewpoints. nt MADem Jun 2015 #498

Nice try. The Straight Story Jun 2015 #595

It wasn't a 'try' -- if you think c- word name-calling is cool, MADem Jun 2015 #610

Another nice try - you know I didn't say that. If you think I did - back it up :) The Straight Story Jun 2015 #629

Stop endorsing or excusing misogyny then...because that is what you are doing MADem Jun 2015 #675

And there you are, doing it again - same technique The Straight Story Jun 2015 #778

You have the power. If you don't want to be mistaken MADem Jun 2015 #892

A lot of cheering going on at someone's demise Exilednight Jun 2015 #429

Did he pass away? LordGlenconner Jun 2015 #503

You should be less sure. He recently had brain surgery. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2015 #567

I suspect you ghost through here chknltl Jun 2015 #433

NYC - My best to you JustAnotherGen Jun 2015 #436

That's a real shame G_j Jun 2015 #447

Grave-dancing does not become us, either. Orsino Jun 2015 #453

permanent ban or a time out for a day or two? Sunlei Jun 2015 #459

Perm. nt LittleBlue Jun 2015 #466

guess he is allowed to start fresh with a new name. really was a very disrespectful remark. Sunlei Jun 2015 #516

By the way, that's not easy Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #529

strip the post count would be suitable punishment. Sunlei Jun 2015 #570

"You know, this would be a good time for Kucinich and other progressives to rally around Obama". Zorra Jun 2015 #473

I often disagree with NYC_SKP; I agree with the ban hammer here; but I'd also support a 2nd chance Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #479

I feel sad about this BainsBane Jun 2015 #486

I am very sad. Way too many are gloating over it. That's even worse. madfloridian Jun 2015 #494

That's irrational. Agschmid Jun 2015 #534

perhaps post on admin page and suggest a week or two ban for that type of comment Sunlei Jun 2015 #536

Yup, I keep most of my substantive stuff nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #829

the really unfortunate thing is that the post he was replying to was removed. mopinko Jun 2015 #490

One of the good guys for sure. ileus Jun 2015 #501

I have gone and read the link. I think NYC SKP got a bum deal. If I wre to refer to a cunning stunt peacebird Jun 2015 #502

did you miss the part where he talked about it being a tongue-twister geek tragedy Jun 2015 #531

Until this thread I had never heard that cunning stunt was code for anything. I still say its peacebird Jun 2015 #550

he had been getting increasingly unhinged and deranged towards Clinton. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #554

I didn't know about "See you next Tuesday" until I relayed a bizarre story to a coworker bettyellen Jun 2015 #565

Nevermind... The googles told me.......Ok, now I have to ask. What does 'see you next Tuesday' mean? peacebird Jun 2015 #576

Oops. Iggo Jun 2015 #603

The See you = CU! Wasn't obvious to me, and puzzling because I said I'd never be back! bettyellen Jun 2015 #607

See you next Tuesday = C U Next Tuesday geek tragedy Jun 2015 #618

The things I learn here. haikugal Jun 2015 #761

It's sad, but justified. SKP morphed into rabidness as soon as HRC entered the race. Hekate Jun 2015 #513

Definitely wouldn't have been my choice BainsBane Jun 2015 #528

I didn't know about the surgery. It's possible.... Hekate Jun 2015 #716

It was surgery on his brain, I believe BainsBane Jun 2015 #753

wow Kali Jun 2015 #522

Wow d_b Jun 2015 #524

I'm sorry to hear that. Voice for Peace Jun 2015 #526

Lewis and Clark vs Bill and Ted snooper2 Jun 2015 #530

So who the hell is going to continually admonish me for having a loud motorcycle now? Glassunion Jun 2015 #541

It's about time. murielm99 Jun 2015 #542

He seemed like a genuinely good guy. peecoolyour Jun 2015 #546

Let this be a lesson to us all. Nye Bevan Jun 2015 #547

The idea that NYC_SKP could get banned is absurd Renew Deal Jun 2015 #548

I'm not going to second guess the ban, but only say... hlthe2b Jun 2015 #561

It's a part of primary season that I had forgotten about. Renew Deal Jun 2015 #583

This thread seems like a celebration. I think that is horrible. madfloridian Jun 2015 #562

Why would you be banned? Agschmid Jun 2015 #593

Why not? madfloridian Jun 2015 #600

Nope I don't think so. Agschmid Jun 2015 #602

SKP got banned for half-cleverly calling Hillary Clinton the c-word in exactly the same geek tragedy Jun 2015 #612

Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #616

And when you're ripping of Drudge, you've hit some kind of low in trolling nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #620

Be civil when you post, don't post insults or nasty language. It isn't that difficult. uppityperson Jun 2015 #645

You seem unaware I have done that. madfloridian Jun 2015 #781

I was speaking in general terms, not aimed at what you do or don't do. uppityperson Jun 2015 #978

Not all of Bernie's supporters are angry Andy823 Jun 2015 #777

To quote my favorite president "this is a teachable moment." DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2015 #568

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2015 #579

One thing I Jamaal510 Jun 2015 #582

ambivalence and complexity are human, whereas lockstep ideological solidarity seems... carolinayellowdog Jun 2015 #632

I think he hated the racism that the Clintons directed toward Obama in 2008 tularetom Jun 2015 #648

"It's" is NOT the same as "She's" cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #585

This is exactly like Drudge calling Cindy Sheehan's arrest a "cunning stunt" geek tragedy Jun 2015 #598

If I disagree, is that hate speech, and/or misogyny as well? cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #649

No, it just means you condone that hate speech geek tragedy Jun 2015 #656

I've seen others with one foot on a banana peel ... lpbk2713 Jun 2015 #587

I'm sorry to hear this LadyHawkAZ Jun 2015 #608

:o PeaceNikki Jun 2015 #614

Lotta crocodile tears being shed for ol' NYC_SKP by supporters of She Who Must Be Obeyed tularetom Jun 2015 #624

Wait, you admit that word provoked you to violence but think it's perfectly geek tragedy Jun 2015 #642

Oh get off your high horse! polly7 Jun 2015 #658

And if I claim honkey isn't as bad as the n word BainsBane Jun 2015 #834

Claim whatever you like. I wasn't responding to you. polly7 Jun 2015 #849

YOU know and I know- digonswine Jun 2015 #909

Exactly right. polly7 Jun 2015 #918

Then what you know is just wrong- digonswine Jun 2015 #928

Nah ..... maybe what you know is 'wrong'. polly7 Jun 2015 #951

Your experiences are yours- digonswine Jun 2015 #961

My experiences are mine. Right on. Equality for 'all', or don't pretend. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #964

Right- digonswine Jun 2015 #969

Your experiences seem to be the unhappy ones. polly7 Jun 2015 #972

#1 It was my daughter, dude, what would you do? tularetom Jun 2015 #671

#1 I think it's unacceptable to call any woman that. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #681

Yup. Agschmid Jun 2015 #693

There's so much wrong in that post tularetom Jun 2015 #742

I think he lost the plot due to his intense hatred of Clinton, to the point geek tragedy Jun 2015 #768

Actually prick dick and c are in the same zip code nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #722

no, as a man I can tell you that virtually no man views "prick" and "dick" geek tragedy Jun 2015 #726

You speak for yourself. polly7 Jun 2015 #730

Your brothers have seriously violent anger issues and need help n/t kcr Jun 2015 #1052

And as a woman I don't care nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #736

there's nothing substantive about that word and is various euphemisms geek tragedy Jun 2015 #741

Here is the thing nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #745

Bottom line, calling Hillary Clinton a c*unt will get one the banhammer. boston bean Jun 2015 #755

Bottom line we will not enforce the rules nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #759

I don't know. I look at what is in question here, and I am not laughing. nt boston bean Jun 2015 #762

So am I. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #772

the anti-semitism should be dealt with much more harshly than it has geek tragedy Jun 2015 #760

The only reason I came back nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #767

You are correct- digonswine Jun 2015 #911

None of those words is shorthand for prostitute. n/t Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #921

Actually yes, according to the dictionary nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #937

Nowhere in your link does it get defined as prostitute. Gormy Cuss Jun 2015 #944

As I said, they danced around it nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #974

Yes, but it doesn't mean "prostitute" zappaman Jun 2015 #977

Well slut and prostitue are synonyms. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #982

What? zappaman Jun 2015 #985

Old college joke nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #986

Well this certainly doesn't sound like him. cliffordu Jun 2015 #655

Well then, shame on Grantcart. In_The_Wind Jun 2015 #674

Fuck YEAH! In any event, cliffordu Jun 2015 #701

What does Grantcart have to do with Earl G banning NYC-SKP? Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2015 #687

One has absolutely nothing to do with the other. cliffordu Jun 2015 #700

How the hell do you make a double entendre out of monkey brains? rug Jun 2015 #884

Well, first you get this monkey, see..... cliffordu Jun 2015 #998

Good. riversedge Jun 2015 #667

wow. forever? Liberal_in_LA Jun 2015 #668

The Devil made me do it. kentuck Jun 2015 #669

I was starting to wonder Flying Squirrel Jun 2015 #677

This message was self-deleted by its author Capt. Obvious Jun 2015 #682

I am guessing there is no way we can keep the thread from getting nasty. el_bryanto Jun 2015 #692

night shift hasn't even signed on yet. nt geek tragedy Jun 2015 #697

...silence... MineralMan Jun 2015 #705

The Pain of Loving You kentuck Jun 2015 #720

no censorship is good censorship captainarizona Jun 2015 #724

Then maybe DU isn't for you. Cause pinned right at the top of boston bean Jun 2015 #744

Did you not read the Terms of Service when you signed up? "By registering a Democratic Underground uppityperson Jun 2015 #756

NYC_SKP in his own words: Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #727

Yeah, that was pretty amazing, but I guess it's a lot easier to blame the people geek tragedy Jun 2015 #774

Sad. I liked his passion Android3.14 Jun 2015 #747

Oh I'm so sad. Stupid mistake. applegrove Jun 2015 #757

Unrecommended to the max. Enthusiast Jun 2015 #758

Interesting Lithos Jun 2015 #766

Too bad...he was making me nuts lately joeybee12 Jun 2015 #769

There's no place for that word used that way here. As much as I enjoy 90% of NYC, he had to know.... marble falls Jun 2015 #775

It is sad to think that some people think that the "C" word is acceptable as honest critique Agnosticsherbet Jun 2015 #786

agree - I thought DU was better than that DrDan Jun 2015 #805

This thread is a huge eye opener. KMOD Jun 2015 #791

I fail to see how calling any particular woman ANY name ... is derogatory to all women ... baffled brett_jv Jun 2015 #796

I think there should be boundaries and racist and sexist and homophobic name calling should be one uponit7771 Jun 2015 #806

He is just the latest in a long line of posters here that get sucked into GD and start taking Number23 Jun 2015 #797

Don't agree with the banning. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #802

Great idea. I'll do similar. MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #808

Done and done. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #820

If it makes you feel any better, Omaha Steve set that up. merrily Jun 2015 #843

Omaha Steve is A-OK in my book. Glad to help! nt. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #859

I expect you'll be short that $50 soon. nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #850

I'm in for another $20. Good idea, indeed. eom Purveyor Jun 2015 #861

If you paid attention to this poster's imput after Sandy Hook, you'd be wondering who the "real" KittyWampus Jun 2015 #810

So, you're saying he had a sock puppet to respond to his own post? progressoid Jun 2015 #976

Well buh bye we can do it Jun 2015 #812

You are mistaken, he called no one any such thing, very dishonest of you, unbelievably so in fact. Dragonfli Jun 2015 #815

... Cleita Jun 2015 #841

this thread has 800+ replies.... mike_c Jun 2015 #826

A 7 year member given the death penalty over one post. 99Forever Jun 2015 #827

I agree with you. HornBuckler Jun 2015 #833

I agree darkangel218 Jun 2015 #836

That's a shame he said that steve2470 Jun 2015 #828

Agreed! helpful and freindly to me as well . The hostility toward orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #831

One can say the same thing about how HRC supporters are treated here. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #870

I see you attacked numerous times. zappaman Jun 2015 #904

If it was against warren there woukd be a huge outcry here. hrmjustin Jun 2015 #916

NYC_SKP Has been an informative ,valuable, source, this is orpupilofnature57 Jun 2015 #830

Gunner down! alcibiades_mystery Jun 2015 #839

LOL. Downtown Hound Jun 2015 #854

I wonder if all his defenders would be defending him if it was about Warren? zappaman Jun 2015 #842

I don't know about all of them Kali Jun 2015 #941

I volunteered for Warren's campaign in 2012, so here's my answer. Jim Lane Jun 2015 #1047

I alerted on this OP as being Meta. The hosts are locking all the other threads about NYC_SKP darkangel218 Jun 2015 #844

Which goes to the issue at heart nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #858

except that you often claim ANY criticism or disagreement as a personal attack Kali Jun 2015 #915

Not any nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #930

my pals? see who does the snide remarks? Kali Jun 2015 #939

Yes your pals nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #947

such a fine example of what I was talking about Kali Jun 2015 #949

LMAO, but expected nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #950

Oh and one more thing Kali nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #933

about the only thing you are a victim of Kali Jun 2015 #955

For the rest of the class nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #959

It seems those other posts were locked for complaining, per Skinner's pinned thread, top of forum uppityperson Jun 2015 #864

some meta is allowed Kali Jun 2015 #913

:-) pintobean Jun 2015 #943

Bad decision IMO. DanTex Jun 2015 #845

That sux. I know he stepped over the line... HooptieWagon Jun 2015 #848

He was trying to be funny, not clever fadedrose Jun 2015 #851

Everyone who wants NYC_SKP back, please message the Administrators darkangel218 Jun 2015 #865

Its a civil community, first and foremost!!!! nt William769 Jun 2015 #872

A poster messes up in ONE post, and you think he should be permanently banned???? darkangel218 Jun 2015 #875

I want him back. 840high Jun 2015 #885

I find this news as disturbing as I find it disheartening. 2banon Jun 2015 #877

....x10 840high Jun 2015 #888

+1 hifiguy Jun 2015 #897

I hate seeing longtime decent folks driven off by a simple disagreement... Blue_Tires Jun 2015 #878

Sad to see an old timer go. Owl Jun 2015 #882

me too Liberal_in_LA Jun 2015 #946

Well all other posts now about this are locked. This one just keeps on going. madfloridian Jun 2015 #893

Only the celebratory post still going. madfloridian Jun 2015 #898

More celebratory threads were started. merrily Jun 2015 #990

That sucks. Captain Stern Jun 2015 #900

This has been a very revealing thread. merrily Jun 2015 #901

revealing of the costs and risks of investing great time and energy in an online forum carolinayellowdog Jun 2015 #948

902 ileus Jun 2015 #902

Well deserved. HERVEPA Jun 2015 #907

A bullshit, biased decision. This sort of shit is the reason I stopped donating. /nt Marr Jun 2015 #912

I won't be donating again either. polly7 Jun 2015 #924

Likewise. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2015 #1037

This sort of response might encourage me to donate again. MADem Jun 2015 #936

Huh? polly7 Jun 2015 #954

Way to misinterpret my intention... MADem Jun 2015 #960

K. nt. polly7 Jun 2015 #965

I don't care what you do. /nt Marr Jun 2015 #1041

The hide was well-deserved. The ban was not. Terra Alta Jun 2015 #914

Unfortunate ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2015 #917

This banning stuff seems way over the top Depaysement Jun 2015 #923

Some history on DU with the C word Renew Deal Jun 2015 #931

Ed Schultz was only off the air for a few days for a bad word Omaha Steve Jun 2015 #938

This is going to be a long hot primary season. nt BumRushDaShow Jun 2015 #940

I'm sorry to see him banned because I like him, Beacool Jun 2015 #945

48 to go Renew Deal Jun 2015 #952

here is where the credibilty wears DonCoquixote Jun 2015 #958

C'mon, git to 1000 in a day, git dere boy, git it. AngryAmish Jun 2015 #962

Wow GP6971 Jun 2015 #963

Has to be close Renew Deal Jun 2015 #968

C'mon! We can hit 1000 posts today! We love to talk about ourselves neverforget Jun 2015 #967

1000 replies within 12 hours -- almost. aikoaiko Jun 2015 #970

Post removed Post removed Jun 2015 #975

Joe polly7 Jun 2015 #979

Going for 1,000. The topics really hit a nerve here, but it was not "just one post".... Hekate Jun 2015 #984

So EarlG was fibbing in his ban message? ScreamingMeemie Jun 2015 #994

Well said. n/t JTFrog Jun 2015 #995

This is going to be an awesome place to post Aerows Jun 2015 #1007

K & R GP6971 Jun 2015 #987

Bad form, DU. MelungeonWoman Jun 2015 #989

Oh no, not NYC, he is a good person! akbacchus_BC Jun 2015 #991

For post 999, here's a brief exchange between NYC_SKP and EarlG from Sept '13 Electric Monk Jun 2015 #999

and, Skinner.. still being "clever" Cha Jun 2015 #1009

While we're reminiscing about 2013 pintobean Jun 2015 #1025

Oh, you want to go there? Ok. Oh, and you cropped out the best part. Electric Monk Jun 2015 #1045

The exchange was hilarious. pintobean Jun 2015 #1046

1000! Prism Jun 2015 #1000

Congratulations Prism! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1003

This sounds suspiciously like the office version! Prism Jun 2015 #1004

It's almost exactly the same! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1005

10001 post! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1001

Not 10001 yet, got 9000 to go first. JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2015 #1012

Oops! lovemydog Jun 2015 #1083

No. Just. No. raven mad Jun 2015 #1014

We love and we miss you buddy....one of the true good guys. ileus Jun 2015 #1016

I'm sure I've disagreed with him a time or two davidpdx Jun 2015 #1021

He snarked me recently. Want me to throw him some red meat? WhaTHellsgoingonhere Jun 2015 #1022

I have nothing to contribute to this thread Sanity Claws Jun 2015 #1026

What's to stop a banned member from cleaning their cookies and B Calm Jun 2015 #1030

nothing, but if he's banned by IP address, he has to get a lot more inventive than that nt steve2470 Jun 2015 #1070

To be honest ... lpbk2713 Jun 2015 #1040

I am sorry but He should have been banned after these posts: LostOne4Ever Jun 2015 #1044

Not to mention his nasty OP after Sandy Hook. Jamastiene Jun 2015 #1048

Exactly! Only reason I didn't mention SH is because I was not a part of DU then (nt) LostOne4Ever Jun 2015 #1050

None of his defenders will even attempt to address the facts of those Hebdo or Sandy Hook posts Bluenorthwest Jun 2015 #1068

What a pantload Egnever Jun 2015 #1074

I read your whole post and -none Jun 2015 #1075

It is victim blaming. Victim blaming people who were brutally murdered. n/t LostOne4Ever Jun 2015 #1084