Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Missed Calls: Is the NSA lying about its failure to prevent 9/11? (James Bamford) [View all]Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)45. I didn't see a mention of General Ahmed in the thread
He was the paymaster for the hijackers and was schmoozing Bush administration officials on the morning of 9/11.
Omar Sheikh, a British-born Islamist militant, is waiting to be hanged in Pakistan for a murder he almost certainly didn't commit - of the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002. Both the US government and Pearl's wife have since acknowledged that Sheikh was not responsible. Yet the Pakistani government is refusing to try other suspects newly implicated in Pearl's kidnap and murder for fear the evidence they produce in court might acquit Sheikh and reveal too much.
Significantly, Sheikh is also the man who, on the instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100,000 before the 9/11 attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count. Why not?
Ahmed, the paymaster for the hijackers, was actually in Washington on 9/11, and had a series of pre-9/11 top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the national security council, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs. When Ahmed was exposed by the Wall Street Journal as having sent the money to the hijackers, he was forced to "retire" by President Pervez Musharraf. Why hasn't the US demanded that he be questioned and tried in court?
The Guardian
Significantly, Sheikh is also the man who, on the instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100,000 before the 9/11 attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count. Why not?
Ahmed, the paymaster for the hijackers, was actually in Washington on 9/11, and had a series of pre-9/11 top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the national security council, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs. When Ahmed was exposed by the Wall Street Journal as having sent the money to the hijackers, he was forced to "retire" by President Pervez Musharraf. Why hasn't the US demanded that he be questioned and tried in court?
The Guardian
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Missed Calls: Is the NSA lying about its failure to prevent 9/11? (James Bamford) [View all]
Octafish
Sep 2015
OP
But, you know, CIA was designed to be the "fall guy" for Presidential covert activities. Plausible
leveymg
Sep 2015
#24
President Truman didn't expect the cloak and dagger stuff when he signed it into law.
Octafish
Sep 2015
#27
Maybe in the day when the CIA answered to the President. Today, I believe it's the other way
rhett o rick
Sep 2015
#33
There were at least 2 Saudi double-agents together in San Diego: al-Midhar and Alwaki
leveymg
Sep 2015
#22
Back at you. Thank you, this would otherwise be a dark blind alley of smoke and mirrors.
leveymg
Sep 2015
#70
Here's the inside story from the FBI liaison at CIA CTC. This has some new info, below
leveymg
Sep 2015
#23
PNAC. The Bush family needed a Reichstag fire type event to jumpstart war in the ME
riderinthestorm
Sep 2015
#41
Reminds me of the English kings plundering other countries and bringing back treasures
Rosa Luxemburg
Sep 2015
#49
Senator Bob Graham was on the trail of these guys, but the FBI refused to issue subpoenas.
seafan
Sep 2015
#18
At the very least, 3000 counts of Negligent Homicide. A multi-count indictment.
leveymg
Sep 2015
#26
The fact that the same close nit group of officials and intelligence agencies 1)"failed" to prevent
GoneFishin
Sep 2015
#13
Bob Graham: FBI hindered Congress’s 9/11 inquiry, withheld reports about Sarasota Saudis
Octafish
Sep 2015
#68
Thanks for the post, seafan, it's very eye-opening. I have never seen this before and I am still
Ghost in the Machine
Sep 2015
#20