Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What should have been done in response to the briefing that Bin Laden planned to attack the US? [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)21. It says there were 70 investigations already going on
Focus on this memo as an isolated piece of the larger picture is beside the point.
You mention a "TSA employee" above. There was no TSA. The federal government did not run airport security at that time.
You mention "order the cockpit doors hardened". That's not how government regulation works. "Okay, we need to order the airlines to do something that is going to cost them a buttload of money, and they'll just do so, despite the absence of a hi-jacking of a commercial airliner in 20 years (with the exception of a small plane in Texas). Because, after all, I have one of 365 daily memos that says they have ""We have not been able to corroborate some of the more sensational threat reporting, such as that from a ---- service in 1998 saying that Bin Laden wanted to hijack a U.S. aircraft...".
Oh, and that 1987 hi-jacking:
January 11, 1987; A Continental Airlines DC-9 was hijacked in flight by Norwood Emanuel, a Muslim hijacker that wanted to crash into the White House on Jan. 11, 1987. The crew diverted a possible disaster 14 years before the 9-11 attack.
Someone actually tried a very similar attack in 1987. No cockpit doors hardened.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

What should have been done in response to the briefing that Bin Laden planned to attack the US? [View all]
oberliner
Sep 2015
OP
" I just don't know what it is he ought to have done that might have helped to prevent the attacks"
jberryhill
Sep 2015
#15
Did I say I didn't want to? I just listed things I thought of -- not every thing
pnwmom
Sep 2015
#17
Apparenlty there was a threat assessment involving airlcraft the cheney admin took seriously when it
zinnisking
Sep 2015
#44
Not only didnt take it seriously, the little prick murdering asshole says "you can say you did your
randys1
Sep 2015
#31
Actually, we have thwarted several attempted terrorist attacks under Obama through
world wide wally
Sep 2015
#7
Remember how good police work used to be (and still is) vilified now by Republicans
Proud Liberal Dem
Sep 2015
#45
There was plenty of opportunity to shoot down all planes while over rural areas...
ChisolmTrailDem
Sep 2015
#22
Compare it to the response of the Clinton administration to the Millennium bomb plot
jeff47
Sep 2015
#11
Why do you leave out the *? That is the answer. Without *, and with "just a president," we got
lonestarnot
Sep 2015
#20
''All right, you've covered your ass.'' -- George W Bush to CIA briefer, August 2001.
Octafish
Sep 2015
#43
It may very well be that Bush could have done nothing to stop this well conceived bin Laden plan BUT
kelliekat44
Sep 2015
#40