
[font size="1"]
War by Henri Rousseau[/font size]
Samantha Power: Liberal War Hawk
Exclusive: Liberal interventionist Samantha Power along with neocon allies appears to have prevailed in the struggle over how President Obama will conduct his foreign policy in his last months in office, promoting aggressive strategies that will lead to more death and destruction, writes Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
ConsortiumNews, June 15, 2015
Propaganda and genocide almost always go hand in hand, with the would-be aggressor stirring up resentment often by assuming the pose of a victim simply acting in self-defense and then righteously inflicting violence on the targeted group.
U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power understands this dynamic having written about the 1994 genocide in Rwanda where talk radio played a key role in getting Hutus to kill Tutsis. Yet, Power is now leading propaganda campaigns laying the groundwork for two potential ethnic slaughters: against the Alawites, Shiites, Christians and other minorities in Syria and against the ethnic Russians of eastern Ukraine.
Though Power is a big promoter of the responsibility to protect or R2P she operates with glaring selectivity in deciding who deserves protection as she advances a neocon/liberal interventionist agenda. She is turning human rights into an excuse not to resolve conflicts but rather to make them bloodier.
Thus, in Powers view, the overthrow and punishment of Syrias President Bashar al-Assad takes precedence over shielding Alawites and other minorities from the likely consequence of Sunni-extremist vengeance. And she has sided with the ethnic Ukrainians in their slaughter of ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine.
In both cases, Power spurns pragmatic negotiations that could avert worsening violence as she asserts a black-and-white depiction of these crises. More significantly, her strident positions appear to have won the day with President Barack Obama, who has relied on Power as a foreign policy adviser since his 2008 campaign.
Powers self-righteous approach to human rights deciding that her side wears white hats and the other side wears black hats is a bracing example of how human rights activists have become purveyors of death and destruction or what some critics have deemed the weaponization of human rights.
CONTINUED...
https://consortiumnews.com/2015/06/15/samantha-power-liberal-war-hawk/
Money trumps peace is pure buy-partisanship.