General Discussion

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)

24. Actually....

Sat Dec 5, 2015, 04:41 PM

Dec 2015

READ UP on Estate Law. The personal effects at a crime scene after or during an investigation are the property of Next of Kin. In this case, the Daughter or whomever is her caretaker. That includes entering the home of residence.

Only the NEXT OF KIN can give permission to enter the home or apartment UNTIL the end of the monthly rental cycle -- which would be the time frame allowed for the NEXT OF KIN to move the personal effects from the rental unit. If the Next of Kin did not remove the effects from the rental unit prior to the end of the monthly rent, then and ONLY THEN do those personal effects are the possessions of the Property Owner to auction, sell, or depose.

Even then, the NEXT OF KIN would have to be given notice LEGALLY -- via a court of law-- the Property Owner would proceed to pursue the action above.

The Media had NO RIGHTS to enter the rental unit UNLESS the Next of Kin or Caretaker/Guardian of the Next of Kin gave permission. The Property Owner had NO RIGHTS to allow anyone else to enter the unit, until pursuing the LEGAL RECOURSE to do so.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

93 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the Hell Just Happened on MSNBC and CNN? [View all] LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 OP

One time that happened, the two reporters died soon thereafter--one murdered, the other shot by cop. Octafish Dec 2015 #1

Three years' probation, eh? Proserpina Dec 2015 #27

Ruined! Same for the other guy, who was Jack Ruby's lawyer for a couple of days. Octafish Dec 2015 #33

God you're always so fascinating. lostnfound Dec 2015 #60

Octafish navarth Dec 2015 #36

Just two more people who got too close to the ugly rury Dec 2015 #43

It was disgusting! TIME TO PANIC Dec 2015 #2

+1 ...what you said n/t ejbr Dec 2015 #16

"News" is entertainment uppityperson Dec 2015 #3

Bingo! That's what it amounts to these days. nt valerief Dec 2015 #26

Kerry Sanders (MSNBC) and Stepanie Elam (CNN) were just awful and creepy! They... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #4

Agreed... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #17

They all envy Geraldo and Capone's safe world wide wally Dec 2015 #5

The FBI released the residence to the original owner. This is a non-issue. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #6

It's still ghoulish starroute Dec 2015 #8

My favorite part of this: Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #9

It was a rented space, and there is such a thing as tenants' rights. Cal Carpenter Dec 2015 #11

Perhaps, but it is all on the landlord. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #12

Yeah, that's basically what I just said. Cal Carpenter Dec 2015 #18

I was simply agreeing. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #20

Actually.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #35

I wonder if the landlord was bought! asjr Dec 2015 #41

Rumor Mill Says.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #48

and he knew the renters were not going back SoCalDem Dec 2015 #92

Landlords are in it for the money TexasProgresive Dec 2015 #22

I understand that the landlord was paid $1000 from a tv program (was it No Vested Interest Dec 2015 #28

I don't see how they could let go of the space so quickly if it had been filled with bomb material Fast Walker 52 Dec 2015 #13

+1 makes me wonder if 'someone' wanted the apartment 'contaminated". snappyturtle Dec 2015 #31

I would so no. Quackers Dec 2015 #39

The Apartment Could Be "Released" Back To The Landlord... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #49

That would fall on the landlord, not law enforcement. Quackers Dec 2015 #52

The Press Has Due Diligence LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #57

I would be curious to find out Quackers Dec 2015 #59

There's a RUMOR.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #66

thanks, but still odd for the SB case, which is a high profile terrorism case Fast Walker 52 Dec 2015 #64

it certainly is weird, and goes along with other weirdness Fast Walker 52 Dec 2015 #62

That is left to be determined... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #19

My comment was directed at this point made by the OP: "Tainting the criminal scene... " Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #21

Hard to say, really. Were they in arrears in rent? Could it be said that they "abandoned the MADem Dec 2015 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #63

Ummm, Like What? LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #65

Good grief! Listen to yourself! MADem Dec 2015 #70

Prioities....Interesting.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #71

Keep smacking your head and tipping your hat. That kid won't get a dime by the time MADem Dec 2015 #72

Actually.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #75

Prove your assertions or walk. You're the one who needs to deal with a few facts, here, MADem Dec 2015 #77

Walk Where? LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #80

Just because you started it, doesn't mean you've PROVED a thing. MADem Dec 2015 #82

It may be illegal wheniwasincongress Dec 2015 #58

How can they release it so quickly? Not exactly thorough, were they? lostnfound Dec 2015 #61

Wouldn't it be against the law for the landlord to do that? Marrah_G Dec 2015 #7

No. Law enforcement had walked away from the residence and returned control to the landlord. Buzz Clik Dec 2015 #10

Was the rent not up to date? TexasProgresive Dec 2015 #23

They probably violated the lease when they turned the place MADem Dec 2015 #79

Actually.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #24

It was absolutely legal, but B2G Dec 2015 #25

Actually AGAIN -- No It Was Not - California INTERSTATE SUCCESSION Laws LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #30

Nobody removed any of their property. B2G Dec 2015 #34

Where You There? LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #37

Were you? Good grief, you're certainly insistent that someone -- with cameras everywhere--would MADem Dec 2015 #73

See You're Upset.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #74

No, I'm reading the entire thread, here, and I see you piping up constantly, MADem Dec 2015 #76

It's OUR Thread.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #78

It's based on a nonsensical premise. MADem Dec 2015 #81

It's questionable, branford Dec 2015 #14

breaching the lease is immaterial TorchTheWitch Dec 2015 #83

First, I though the landlords actions were stupid. branford Dec 2015 #84

the landlord's actions were ILLEGAL TorchTheWitch Dec 2015 #89

American media retrowire Dec 2015 #15

What media? navarth Dec 2015 #38

Will fact-based journalism emerge from this rummaging, Ron Green Dec 2015 #29

Likely NO.... LovingA2andMI Dec 2015 #32

If it bleeds it leads shadowmayor Dec 2015 #40

American media is the envy of the world! Enthusiast Dec 2015 #42

Ever see a vulture on a kill? tooeyeten Dec 2015 #46

The police have the last suspect in custody and still alive... Volaris Dec 2015 #44

There is no other suspect in custody. cwydro Dec 2015 #51

I thought the third person was not involved and was let go Renew Deal Dec 2015 #54

Apparently I'm mistaken. Volaris Dec 2015 #87

Kerry Sanders tooeyeten Dec 2015 #45

Theyre just giving people what they want... chervilant Dec 2015 #47

Sensationalism washed with xenophobia or otherwise known JEB Dec 2015 #50

I don't blame the media. Renew Deal Dec 2015 #53

When the New York Times decided a serious retrospect on the invasion of Iraq wasn't called for Babel_17 Dec 2015 #56

SometimesI think there are no ethics anywhere anymore oldandhappy Dec 2015 #67

The landlord claims he didn't allow media to enter, Unknown Beatle Dec 2015 #68

Then the M$M and mass consumers have finally reached their crossing point. Rex Dec 2015 #86

I saw him pry off the plywood..and let them in SoCalDem Dec 2015 #93

I didn't see the clip of it, but if that is true it is extremely disturbing davidpdx Dec 2015 #69

It's a good possibility the lease agreement redstateblues Dec 2015 #85

they want more blood shed is what's happening tenderfoot Dec 2015 #88

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2015 #90

What about Sandyhook? uppityperson Dec 2015 #91